World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
92
Citations
41610
World Ranking
2169
National Ranking
1173

Medicine

D-Index
101
Citations
48566
World Ranking
7845
National Ranking
4089

Clifton Bogardus publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Clifton Bogardus sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 270 publications — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Clifton Bogardus D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Clifton Bogardus sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 92 D-Index — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Clifton Bogardus is affiliated with the National Institutes of Health in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the intersections of biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, and medicine, with a strong emphasis on the genetic and molecular aspects of metabolic diseases, particularly diabetes.

Their main fields of study include:

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
  • Medicine

The subfields where Bogardus has contributed include:

  • Genetics
  • Molecular Biology
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
  • Surgery
  • Physiology

Within their research scope, the key topics covered are:

  • Pancreatic function and diabetes
  • Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease
  • Diabetes Management and Research
  • Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Genomics and Rare Diseases
  • Genetic Syndromes and Imprinting

Notable recent publications by Bogardus include:

  • One-hour glucose is an earlier marker of dysglycemia than two-hour glucose, 2023, Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice
  • Characterization of Exome Variants and Their Metabolic Impact in 6,716 American Indians from the Southwest US, 2020, The American Journal of Human Genetics
  • Exome Sequencing of 21 Bardet-Biedl Syndrome (BBS) Genes to Identify Obesity Variants in 6,851 American Indians, 2021, Obesity
  • Relationship Between Insulin Secretion and Insulin Sensitivity and Its Role in Development of Type 2 Diabetes: Beyond the Disposition Index, 2021, Diabetes
  • Exome Sequencing Identifies A Nonsense Variant in DAO Associated With Reduced Energy Expenditure in American Indians, 2020, The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism

Bogardus frequently collaborates with several co-authors, including:

  • Leslie J. Baier
  • Robert L. Hanson
  • Çiğdem Köroğlu
  • William C. Knowler
  • Michael Traurig

Their work has been published predominantly in the following venues:

  • Diabetes
  • Obesity
  • The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice

This profile reflects a comprehensive academic footprint marked by contributions to understanding the genetics and molecular biology of metabolic disorders, with particular attention to diabetes and related conditions.

Best Publications

  • The natural history of insulin secretory dysfunction and insulin resistance in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes mellitus.

    Christian Weyer;Clifton Bogardus;David M. Mott;Richard E. Pratley

  • Insulin Resistance and Insulin Secretory Dysfunction as Precursors of Non-Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus: Prospective Studies of Pima Indians

    Stephen Lillioja;David M. Mott;Maximilian Spraul;Robert Ferraro

  • Genetic variation in the gene encoding calpain-10 is associated with type 2 diabetes mellitus

    Y Horikawa;N Oda;N J Cox;X Li;X Li

  • Reduced Rate of Energy Expenditure as a Risk Factor for Body-Weight Gain

    Eric Ravussin;Stephen Lillioja;William C. Knowler;Laurent Christin

  • Skeletal Muscle Triglyceride Levels Are Inversely Related to Insulin Action

    D A Pan;S Lillioja;A D Kriketos;M R Milner

  • Energy-balance studies reveal associations between gut microbes, caloric load, and nutrient absorption in humans

    Reiner Jumpertz;Duc Son Le;Peter J Turnbaugh;Cathy Trinidad

  • Skeletal muscle metabolism is a major determinant of resting energy expenditure.

    Francesco Zurlo;Karen Larson;Clifton Bogardus;Eric Ravussin

  • Enlarged subcutaneous abdominal adipocyte size, but not obesity itself, predicts type II diabetes independent of insulin resistance.

    C. Weyer;J. E. Foley;C. Bogardus;P. A. Tataranni

  • Low ratio of fat to carbohydrate oxidation as predictor of weight gain: study of 24-h RQ

    F. Zurlo;S. Lillioja;A. Esposito del Puente;B. L. Nyomba

  • Skeletal muscle capillary density and fiber type are possible determinants of in vivo insulin resistance in man.

    Stephen Lillioja;A Young;Carol L Culter;John L Ivy

  • High Alanine Aminotransferase Is Associated With Decreased Hepatic Insulin Sensitivity and Predicts the Development of Type 2 Diabetes

    Barbora Vozarova;Norbert Stefan;Robert S. Lindsay;Aramesh Saremi

  • Time of Onset of Non-Insulin-Dependent Diabetes Mellitus and Genetic Variation in the β3-Adrenergic–Receptor Gene

    Jeremy Walston;Kristi Silver;Clifton Bogardus;William C. Knowler

  • Circulating interleukin-6 in relation to adiposity, insulin action, and insulin secretion.

    Barbora Vozarova;Christian Weyer;Kristin Hanson;P. Antonio Tataranni

  • Impaired glucose tolerance as a disorder of insulin action. Longitudinal and cross-sectional studies in Pima Indians

    Stephen Lillioja;David M. Mott;Barbara V. Howard;Peter H. Bennett

  • Relationship of genetics, age, and physical fitness to daily energy expenditure and fuel utilization

    Eric Ravussin;Clifton Bogardus

  • High White Blood Cell Count Is Associated With a Worsening of Insulin Sensitivity and Predicts the Development of Type 2 Diabetes

    Barbora Vozarova;Christian Weyer;Robert S. Lindsay;Richard E. Pratley

  • Plasma Adiponectin Concentration Is Associated With Skeletal Muscle Insulin Receptor Tyrosine Phosphorylation, and Low Plasma Concentration Precedes a Decrease in Whole-Body Insulin Sensitivity in Humans

    Norbert Stefan;Barbora Vozarova;Tohru Funahashi;Yuji Matsuzawa

  • Evaluation of Simple Indices of Insulin Sensitivity and Insulin Secretion for Use in Epidemioiogic Studies

    Robert L. Hanson;Richard E. Pratley;Clifton Bogardus;K. M. Narayan

  • Familial dependence of the resting metabolic rate.

    Clifton Bogardus;Stephen Lillioja;Eric Ravussin;William Abbott

  • Insulin resistance and insulin secretory dysfunction are independent predictors of worsening of glucose tolerance during each stage of type 2 diabetes development.

    C Weyer;P A Tataranni;C Bogardus;R E Pratley

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert L. Hanson
Robert L. Hanson National Institutes of Health
William C. Knowler
William C. Knowler National Institutes of Health
Eric Ravussin
Eric Ravussin Pennington Biomedical Research Center
Richard E. Pratley
Richard E. Pratley Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute
Alan R. Shuldiner
Alan R. Shuldiner University of Maryland, Baltimore
Peter H. Bennett
Peter H. Bennett National Institutes of Health
Norbert Stefan
Norbert Stefan German Center for Diabetes Research
Barbara V. Howard
Barbara V. Howard MedStar Health
Philippe Froguel
Philippe Froguel Imperial College London
Boyd Swinburn
Boyd Swinburn University of Auckland

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As the fields of Biology and Biochemistry evolve, so do the related career pathways and degree options. For those interested in the intersection of health and information technology, the bachelor's degree health information management is becoming increasingly popular. This program combines medical knowledge with data management skills, opening doors to roles in healthcare administration and informatics.

Nutrition is another growing sector connected to biochemistry. Earning an online nutrition masters can prepare graduates for advanced careers in dietetics, public health, and wellness consulting.

For those interested in the diagnostic side of healthcare, there are excellent opportunities to study through ultrasound tech programs online. These programs equip students with hands-on imaging skills vital for hospitals, clinics, and research labs.

Similarly, pursuing the best online radiology tech programs supports those aiming for dynamic technology-driven roles in medical imaging and diagnostics. These associate degrees are a practical, accessible way to enter the expanding healthcare sector.

Best Scientists Citing Clifton Bogardus

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles