World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
49
Citations
10395
World Ranking
5858
National Ranking
2657

Atif M. Memon publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Atif M. Memon sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 150 publications — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Atif M. Memon D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Atif M. Memon sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Atif M. Memon is affiliated with the University of Maryland, College Park in the United States. Their research spans multiple aspects of computer science, with a primary focus on artificial intelligence, software, and information systems.

Their work covers several specialized subfields, including:

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Software
  • Information Systems
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
  • Computer Networks and Communications

Within these areas, their main topics of research encompass:

  • Topic Modeling
  • Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
  • Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Software System Performance and Reliability
  • Web Application Security Vulnerabilities
  • Machine Learning and Data Classification

Atif Memon has contributed to papers published in various academic venues. Their frequent publication outlets include:

  • Software Testing Verification and Reliability
  • IEEE Access
  • Proceedings of the 30th ACM Joint European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering
  • arXiv (Cornell University)

Notable papers authored or coauthored by Atif Memon include:

  • Toward Robust Evaluation: A Comprehensive Taxonomy of Datasets and Metrics for Open Domain Question Answering in the Era of Large Language Models, 2024, IEEE Access
  • Editorial for the special issue of STVR on the 10th IEEE International Conference on Software Testing, Verification, and Validation (ICST 2017), 2020, Software Testing Verification and Reliability
  • The IEEE 12th International Conference on Software Testing, Verification & Validation, 2021, Software Testing Verification and Reliability
  • Improving ML-based information retrieval software with user-driven functional testing and defect class analysis, 2022, Proceedings of the 30th ACM Joint European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering
  • Towards Robust Evaluation: A Comprehensive Taxonomy of Datasets and Metrics for Open Domain Question Answering in the Era of Large Language Models, 2024, arXiv (Cornell University)

They have collaborated frequently with several coauthors, including:

  • Akchay Srivastava
  • Ina Schieferdecker
  • Hironori Washizaki
  • Myra B. Cohen
  • Junjie Zhu

The combination of their diverse publication venues and broad research topics indicates a focus on improving software testing methodologies, especially with respect to machine learning applications and evaluation metrics within artificial intelligence. The recurring theme of software testing and verification surfaces in both their authored papers and collaborative efforts.

Best Publications

  • Using GUI ripping for automated testing of Android applications

    Domenico Amalfitano;Anna Rita Fasolino;Porfirio Tramontana;Salvatore De Carmine

  • GUI ripping: reverse engineering of graphical user interfaces for testing

    A. Memon;I. Banerjee;A. Nagarajan

  • Hierarchical GUI test case generation using automated planning

    A.M. Memon;M.E. Pollack;M.L. Soffa

  • MobiGUITAR: Automated Model-Based Testing of Mobile Apps

    Domenico Amalfitano;Anna Rita Fasolino;Porfirio Tramontana;Bryan Dzung Ta

  • An event-flow model of GUI-based applications for testing

    Atif M. Memon

  • Coverage criteria for GUI testing

    Atif M. Memon;Mary Lou Soffa;Martha E. Pollack

  • Studying the fault-detection effectiveness of GUI test cases for rapidly evolving software

    A.M. Memon;Q. Xie

  • GUITAR: an innovative tool for automated testing of GUI-driven software

    Bao N. Nguyen;Bryan Robbins;Ishan Banerjee;Atif Memon

  • MODLEACH: A Variant of LEACH for WSNs

    D. Mahmood;N. Javaid;S. Mahmood;S. Qureshi

  • Designing and comparing automated test oracles for GUI-based software applications

    Qing Xie;Atif M. Memon

  • Regression testing of GUIs

    Atif M. Memon;Mary Lou Soffa

  • GUI testing: pitfalls and process

    A.M. Memon

  • A comprehensive framework for testing graphical user interfaces

    Mary Lou Soffa;Atif Muhammed Memon

  • GUI Interaction Testing: Incorporating Event Context

    Xun Yuan;M. B. Cohen;A. M. Memon

  • Automated test oracles for GUIs

    Atif M. Memon;Martha E. Pollack;Mary Lou Soffa

  • Taming google-scale continuous testing

    Atif Memon;Zebao Gao;Bao Nguyen;Sanjeev Dhanda

  • Call-Stack Coverage for GUI Test Suite Reduction

    S. McMaster;A.M. Memon

  • Graphical user interface (GUI) testing: Systematic mapping and repository

    Ishan Banerjee;Bao Nguyen;Vahid Garousi;Vahid Garousi;Atif Memon

  • Using GUI Run-Time State as Feedback to Generate Test Cases

    Xun Yuan;Atif M. Memon

  • Automatically repairing event sequence-based GUI test suites for regression testing

    Atif M. Memon

Frequent Co-Authors

Adam Porter
Adam Porter University of Maryland, College Park
Alan Sussman
Alan Sussman University of Maryland, College Park
Myra B. Cohen
Myra B. Cohen Iowa State University
Mary Lou Soffa
Mary Lou Soffa University of Virginia
Anna Rita Fasolino
Anna Rita Fasolino University of Naples Federico II
Douglas C. Schmidt
Douglas C. Schmidt William & Mary
Martha E. Pollack
Martha E. Pollack Cornell University
Aniruddha Gokhale
Aniruddha Gokhale Vanderbilt University
Nadeem Javaid
Nadeem Javaid National Yunlin University of Science and Technology
Marvin V. Zelkowitz
Marvin V. Zelkowitz University of Maryland, College Park

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA doesn’t mean you’re limited to only four-year campus programs. With many flexible online pathways now available, you can tailor your education to your schedule and career goals.

For those eager to accelerate their career, consider the shortest masters degree options. These online programs allow you to complete your education in less time and often with a focused curriculum. Alternatively, if you’re looking for return on investment, check out the most valuable masters degrees to identify specialized skills that are highly sought after in today’s job market.

Not ready for a master’s yet? An associate's degree online can be a great starting point, providing foundational knowledge for entry-level positions and a pathway to further education.

Affordability is a major concern for many students. By considering the cheapest online colleges, you can limit student debt while still achieving a respected degree and launching your tech career.

Best Scientists Citing Atif M. Memon

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles