World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
43
Citations
6709
World Ranking
8060
National Ranking
324

Ali Mesbah publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ali Mesbah sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 250 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 560 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 424 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 378 scientists 262–271 publications: 300 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 114 publications — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Ali Mesbah D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ali Mesbah sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 984 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 969 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 765 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 517 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ali Mesbah is affiliated with the University of British Columbia in Canada. Their research mainly focuses on the field of Computer Science with an emphasis on Software and Information Systems. Their work addresses various specialized areas including Software Testing and Debugging Techniques, Software Engineering Research, and Software Reliability and Analysis Research.

Mesbah has contributed to the following key topics in their research:

  • Software Testing and Debugging Techniques
  • Software Engineering Research
  • Software Reliability and Analysis Research
  • Advanced Malware Detection Techniques
  • Web Data Mining and Analysis
  • Software System Performance and Reliability
  • Web Applications and Data Management

The scientist has authored papers published in venues such as arXiv (Cornell University), IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, Software Testing Verification and Reliability, and Empirical Software Engineering.

Frequent co-authors in their collaborations include Noor Nashid, Parsa Alian, Davood Mazinanian, and Mohammad Bajammal.

Selected recent publications by Ali Mesbah include:

  • "BUGSJS: a benchmark and taxonomy of JavaScript bugs" (2020), Software Testing Verification and Reliability
  • "A Survey on the Use of Computer Vision to Improve Software Engineering Tasks" (2020), IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
  • "Fragment-Based Test Generation for Web Apps" (2022), IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
  • "A controlled experiment of different code representations for learning-based program repair" (2022), Empirical Software Engineering
  • "<scp>Katana</scp>: Dual Slicing Based Context for Learning Bug Fixes" (2023), ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology

Best Publications

  • Real Challenges in Mobile App Development

    Mona Erfani Joorabchi;Ali Mesbah;Philippe Kruchten

  • Crawling Ajax-Based Web Applications through Dynamic Analysis of User Interface State Changes

    Ali Mesbah;Arie van Deursen;Stefan Lenselink

  • Crawling AJAX by Inferring User Interface State Changes

    A. Mesbah;E. Bozdag;A. van Deursen

  • Invariant-based automatic testing of AJAX user interfaces

    Ali Mesbah;Arie van Deursen

  • Invariant-Based Automatic Testing of Modern Web Applications

    A. Mesbah;A. van Deursen;D. Roest

  • Automated cross-browser compatibility testing

    Ali Mesbah;Mukul R. Prasad

  • Migrating Multi-page Web Applications to Single-page AJAX Interfaces

    A. Mesbah;A. van Deursen

  • JSNOSE: Detecting JavaScript Code Smells

    Amin Milani Fard;Ali Mesbah

  • Mining questions asked by web developers

    Kartik Bajaj;Karthik Pattabiraman;Ali Mesbah

  • A Comparison of Push and Pull Techniques for AJAX

    E. Bozdag;A. Mesbah;A. van Deursen

  • Retrieval-Based Prompt Selection for Code-Related Few-Shot Learning

    Unknown

  • A component- and push-based architectural style for ajax applications

    Ali Mesbah;Arie van Deursen

  • An Architectural Style for Ajax

    A. Mesbah;A. van Deursen

  • A systematic mapping study of web application testing

    Vahid Garousi;Vahid Garousi;Ali Mesbah;Aysu Betin-Can;Shabnam Mirshokraie

  • Determining differences in an event-driven application accessed in different client-tier environments

    Mukul R. Prasad;Ali Mesbah

  • An empirical study of bugs in test code

    Arash Vahabzadeh;Amin Milani Fard;Ali Mesbah

  • An Empirical Study of Client-Side JavaScript Bugs

    Frolin Ocariza;Kartik Bajaj;Karthik Pattabiraman;Ali Mesbah

  • DeepDelta: learning to repair compilation errors

    Ali Mesbah;Andrew Rice;Emily Johnston;Nick Glorioso

  • Assertions are strongly correlated with test suite effectiveness

    Yucheng Zhang;Ali Mesbah

  • Leveraging existing tests in automated test generation for web applications

    Amin Milani Fard;Mehdi Mirzaaghaei;Ali Mesbah

  • Discovering bug patterns in JavaScript

    Quinn Hanam;Fernando S. de M. Brito;Ali Mesbah

Frequent Co-Authors

Karthik Pattabiraman
Karthik Pattabiraman University of British Columbia
Arie van Deursen
Arie van Deursen Delft University of Technology
Filippo Ricca
Filippo Ricca University of Genoa
Paolo Tonella
Paolo Tonella Universita della Svizzera Italiana
Martin Pinzger
Martin Pinzger University of Klagenfurt
Andy Zaidman
Andy Zaidman Delft University of Technology
Bram Adams
Bram Adams Queen's University
Danny Dig
Danny Dig University of Colorado Boulder
Gabriele Bavota
Gabriele Bavota Universita della Svizzera Italiana
Foutse Khomh
Foutse Khomh Polytechnique Montréal

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As you explore studying Computer Science in the USA, you might also consider related online degrees and specialized career pathways. The flexibility and accessibility of distance learning make it easier than ever to pursue a high-quality education in your chosen area.

Many professionals start by researching the best online accredited universities to ensure their degree will be recognized by employers and other institutions. Accreditation is crucial for validating your skills and knowledge in the tech industry.

If you are passionate about interactive entertainment, attending an online school for game design can help you break into the world of video games and simulation. For those interested in online security, pursuing an online cybersecurity degree is an excellent route to a rapidly growing field that protects organizations from digital threats.

Alternatively, computer science principles are increasingly valuable in industries like construction. Earning a master of construction management online can position you for leadership roles in a sector that is quickly adopting new technologies and project management tools.

Best Scientists Citing Ali Mesbah

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles