World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Tibor Schuster

Tibor Schuster

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 84 15121 14229 626 597 389 25376

Tibor Schuster publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Tibor Schuster between 2003 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Tibor Schuster published across 23 years, from 2003 to 2025, averaging 20.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 60 publications in 2011. 28 of the 465 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 60. Peak 60 publications in 2011. 2003: 1 publication 2004: 0 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 12 publications 2008: 22 publications 2009: 38 publications 2010: 47 publications 2011: 60 publications 2012: 50 publications 2013: 47 publications 2014: 25 publications 2015: 15 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 16 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 17 publications 2022: 16 publications 2023: 28 publications 2024: 17 publications 2025: 11 publications
2003 2025

465 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Tibor Schuster: publications per year, 2003 to 2025
Year Publications
2003 1
2004 0
2005 0
2006 0
2007 12
2008 22
2009 38
2010 47
2011 60
2012 50
2013 47
2014 25
2015 15
2016 7
2017 14
2018 13
2019 16
2020 9
2021 17
2022 16
2023 28
2024 17
2025 11
Total 465
Download as CSV

Tibor Schuster publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tibor Schuster sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 381–400 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 389 publications — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861 389
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Tibor Schuster D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tibor Schuster sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 84–85 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 84 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003 84
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Tibor Schuster is a researcher affiliated with McGill University in Canada specializing in Medicine, with a significant focus on several subfields including General Health Professions, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Epidemiology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, and Infectious Diseases.

Their work commonly addresses topics such as:

  • Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
  • Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Healthcare Systems and Technology
  • Cultural Competency in Health Care
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions

Some of the notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Schuster include:

  • "Roles, Users, Benefits, and Limitations of Chatbots in Health Care: Rapid Review" published in 2024 in the Journal of Medical Internet Research
  • "A controlled human infection model of Streptococcus pyogenes pharyngitis (CHIVAS-M75): an observational, dose-finding study" published in 2021 in The Lancet Microbe
  • "Subphenotyping of Patients With Aortic Stenosis by Unsupervised Agglomerative Clustering of Echocardiographic and Hemodynamic Data" published in 2021 in JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
  • "Treatment and prescribing trends of antihypertensive drugs in 2.7 million UK primary care patients over 31 years: a population-based cohort study" published in 2022 in BMJ Open
  • "Excess body weight as a predictor of response to treatment with antidepressants in patients with depressive disorder" published in 2020 in Journal of Affective Disorders

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Schuster include:

  • Stephanie Long
  • Kim Engler
  • Bertrand Lebouché
  • Mark Lachmann
  • Elena Rippen

Their research has been published repeatedly in well-regarded venues such as The Annals of Family Medicine, F1000Research, BMJ Open, SSRN Electronic Journal, and Journal of Medical Internet Research.

Best Publications

  • Preoperative/Neoadjuvant Therapy in Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Response and Resection Percentages

    Sonja Gillen;Tibor Schuster;Christian Meyer zum Büschenfelde;Helmut Friess

  • Neurodevelopmental outcome at 2 years of age after general anaesthesia and awake-regional anaesthesia in infancy (GAS): an international multicentre, randomised controlled trial

    Andrew J Davidson;Nicola Disma;Jurgen C de Graaff;Davinia E Withington

  • PET to assess early metabolic response and to guide treatment of adenocarcinoma of the oesophagogastric junction: the MUNICON phase II trial.

    Florian Lordick;Katja Ott;Bernd-Joachim Krause;Wolfgang A Weber

  • Cytochrome 2C19*17 Allelic Variant, Platelet Aggregation, Bleeding Events, and Stent Thrombosis in Clopidogrel-Treated Patients With Coronary Stent Placement

    Dirk Sibbing;Werner Koch;Daniela Gebhard;Tibor Schuster

  • Systematic review and meta-analysis of the role of defunctioning stoma in low rectal cancer surgery.

    Norbert Hüser;Christoph W. Michalski;Mert Erkan;Tibor Schuster

  • Osteoradionecrosis of the jaws as a side effect of radiotherapy of head and neck tumour patients--a report of a thirty year retrospective review.

    T. Reuther;T. Schuster;U. Mende;A. Kübler

  • The detection rate of [11C]Choline-PET/CT depends on the serum PSA-value in patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer

    B. J. Krause;M. Souvatzoglou;M. Tuncel;K. Herrmann

  • Prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer is associated with lymph node ratio: a single-center analysis of 3,026 patients over a 25-year time period.

    Robert Rosenberg;Jan Friederichs;Tibor Schuster;Ralf Gertler

  • Cetuximab plus cisplatin–5-fluorouracil versus cisplatin–5-fluorouracil alone in first-line metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus: a randomized phase II study of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Internistische Onkologie

    S. Lorenzen;T. Schuster;R. Porschen;S.-E. Al-Batran

  • Mucinous and Signet-Ring Cell Colorectal Cancers Differ from Classical Adenocarcinomas in Tumor Biology and Prognosis

    Ulrich Nitsche;Anina Zimmermann;Christoph Späth;Tara Müller

  • Stent thrombosis after drug-eluting stent implantation: incidence, timing, and relation to discontinuation of clopidogrel therapy over a 4-year period

    Stefanie Schulz;Tibor Schuster;Julinda Mehilli;Robert A Byrne

  • Evaluation of the Novel Myocardial Perfusion Positron-Emission Tomography Tracer 18F-BMS-747158-02 Comparison to 13N-Ammonia and Validation With Microspheres in a Pig Model

    S.G. Nekolla;S. Reder;A. Saraste;T. Higuchi

  • 72-h kinetics of high-sensitive troponin T and inflammatory markers after marathon.

    Johannes Scherr;Siegmund Braun;Tibor Schuster;Charlotte Hartmann

  • Validation of the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium Definition of Bleeding in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

    Gjin Ndrepepa;Tibor Schuster;Martin Hadamitzky;Robert A. Byrne

  • Cetuximab plus oxaliplatin/leucovorin/5-fluorouracil in first-line metastatic gastric cancer: a phase II study of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Internistische Onkologie (AIO).

    F Lordick;B Luber;S Lorenzen;S. Hegewisch-Becker

  • Plasma oxytocin and vasopressin do not predict neuropeptide concentrations in human cerebrospinal fluid.

    S. M. Kagerbauer;J. Martin;T. Schuster;M. Blobner

  • Noninvasive diagnosis of actionable mutations by deep sequencing of circulating free DNA in lung cancer from never-smokers: a proof-of-concept study from BioCAST/IFCT-1002.

    Sébastien Couraud;Felipe Vaca-Paniagua;Felipe Vaca-Paniagua;Stéphanie Villar;Javier Oliver

  • Meta-analysis of neoadjuvant treatment modalities and definitive non-surgical therapy for oesophageal squamous cell cancer

    M. Kranzfelder;T. Schuster;H. Geinitz;H. Friess

  • TFAP2E–DKK4 and Chemoresistance in Colorectal Cancer

    Matthias P.A. Ebert;Marc Tänzer;Benjamin Balluff;Elke Burgermeister

  • (18)F-FDG PET-guided salvage neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy of adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: the MUNICON II trial.

    Christian Meyer zum Büschenfelde;Ken Herrmann;Tibor Schuster;Hans Geinitz

Frequent Co-Authors

Ken Herrmann
Ken Herrmann German Cancer Research Center
Markus Schwaiger
Markus Schwaiger Technical University of Munich
Robert D. Rosenberg
Robert D. Rosenberg Technical University of Munich
Christian Peschel
Christian Peschel Technical University of Munich
Roland M. Schmid
Roland M. Schmid Technical University of Munich
Heinz Höfler
Heinz Höfler Technical University of Munich
Axel Walch
Axel Walch Technical University of Munich
Hans-Jürgen Wester
Hans-Jürgen Wester Technical University of Munich
Adnan Kastrati
Adnan Kastrati Technical University of Munich
Florian Lordick
Florian Lordick Leipzig University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in Medicine opens the door to various related fields and modern educational options. Many students now consider accelerated healthcare programs to fast-track their entry into leadership or administrative roles in healthcare. These programs often offer flexible online learning, allowing you to balance your career and studies effectively.

For registered nurses looking to advance, adn to msn bridge programs provide a streamlined pathway to higher qualifications and more specialized roles. If your interest lies in nutrition and health, pursuing the best online food science degree unlocks career options in wellness, research, and dietetics.

Accreditation is essential when selecting a program. To ensure your credentials are valued by employers, focus on which online healthcare degree programs are recognized for their accreditation by cahme? Choosing a CAHME-accredited Master of Healthcare Administration or similar programs can be a smart investment in your future in healthcare leadership.

Best Scientists Citing Tibor Schuster

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles