World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Dieter Deforce

Dieter Deforce

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
71
Citations
16999
World Ranking
6694
National Ranking
117

Dieter Deforce publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dieter Deforce sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 552 publications — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Dieter Deforce D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dieter Deforce sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 71 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Dieter Deforce is a researcher affiliated with Ghent University in Belgium with extensive contributions in the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology. Their scholarly work spans 167 publications in these main fields, with additional focus on Medicine through 86 publications. The scientist's research expertise includes several subfields such as Molecular Biology, Genetics, Plant Science, Spectroscopy, and Biomedical Engineering.

The thematic focus of Dieter Deforce's research encompasses diverse and specialized topics including:

  • Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications
  • Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
  • RNA modifications and cancer
  • Identification and Quantification in Food

Their scientific output includes notable recent papers such as:

  • "Genetically Modified Micro-Organisms for Industrial Food Enzyme Production: An Overview," 2020, Foods
  • "Integrated multi-omics reveal polycomb repressive complex 2 restricts human trophoblast induction," 2022, Nature Cell Biology
  • "Hatching is modulated by microRNA-378a-3p derived from extracellular vesicles secreted by blastocysts," 2022, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "A comprehensive LFQ benchmark dataset on modern day acquisition strategies in proteomics," 2022, Scientific Data
  • "Removing the Hidden Data Dependency of DIA with Predicted Spectral Libraries," 2020, PROTEOMICS

Dieter Deforce frequently collaborates with other researchers, with prominent coauthors including Filip Van Nieuwerburgh, Maarten Dhaenens, Bart Van Puyvelde, Simon Daled, and Yannick Gansemans. These collaborations have yielded numerous joint publications.

The scientist has contributed to a range of publication venues, favoring repositories and journals such as:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Scientific Reports
  • International Journal of Molecular Sciences
  • Frontiers in Physiology
  • Frontiers in Pharmacology

Best Publications

  • The Chara Genome: Secondary Complexity and Implications for Plant Terrestrialization.

    Tomoaki Nishiyama;Hidetoshi Sakayama;Jan de Vries;Jan de Vries;Henrik Buschmann

  • Genome-wide association study of obsessive-compulsive disorder.

    S. E. Stewart;D. Yu;J. M. Scharf;B. M. Neale

  • Partitioning the heritability of tourette syndrome and obsessive compulsive disorder reveals differences in genetic architecture

    Lea K. Davis;Dongmei Yu;Clare L. Keenan;Eric R. Gamazon

  • Reduced amounts and abnormal forms of phospholipase C zeta (PLCzeta) in spermatozoa from infertile men.

    E. Heytens;J. Parrington;K. Coward;K. Coward;C. Young

  • Dissection of the phytohormonal regulation of trichome formation and biosynthesis of the antimalarial compound artemisinin in Artemisia annua plants

    Lies Maes;Filip C. W. Van Nieuwerburgh;Yansheng Zhang;Darwin W. Reed

  • Development and evaluation of different normalization strategies for gene expression studies in Candida albicans biofilms by real-time PCR.

    Heleen Nailis;Tom Coenye;Filip Van Nieuwerburgh;Dieter Deforce

  • Ancient dispersal of the human fungal pathogen Cryptococcus gattii from the Amazon rainforest

    Ferry Hagen;Paulo C. Ceresini;Itzhack Polacheck;Hansong Ma

  • Real-time PCR expression profiling of genes encoding potential virulence factors in Candida albicans biofilms: identification of model-dependent and -independent gene expression

    Heleen Nailis;Soňa Kucharíková;Soňa Kucharíková;Markéta Řičicová;Patrick Van Dijck

  • Current and New Approaches in GMO Detection: Challenges and Solutions

    Marie-Alice Fraiture;Philippe Herman;Isabel Taverniers;Marc De Loose

  • Liquid chromatography—mass spectrometry in forensic toxicology

    Jan F. Van Bocxlaer;Karine M. Clauwaert;Willy E. Lambert;Dieter L. Deforce

  • A Plant-Derived Ligand Favoring Monomeric Glucocorticoid Receptor Conformation with Impaired Transactivation Potential Attenuates Collagen-Induced Arthritis

    Pieter Dewint;Valerie Gossye;Karolien De Bosscher;Wim Vanden Berghe

  • Simultaneous, quantitative determination of opiates, amphetamines, cocaine and benzoylecgonine in oral fluid by liquid chromatography quadrupole-time-of-flight mass spectrometry.

    Kjell A Mortier;Kristof E Maudens;Willy E Lambert;Karine M Clauwaert

  • Tracking the progression of the human inner cell mass during embryonic stem cell derivation

    Thomas O'Leary;Björn Heindryckx;Sylvie Lierman;David van Bruggen

  • Development and validation of an LC-MS/MS method for the simultaneous determination of deoxynivalenol, zearalenone, T-2-toxin and some masked metabolites in different cereals and cereal-derived food

    M De Boevre;J D Di Mavungu;P Maene;K Audenaert

  • Joint GC–MS and LC–MS platforms for comprehensive plant metabolomics: Repeatability and sample pre-treatment

    Ruben t'Kindt;Kris Morreel;Dieter Deforce;Wout Boerjan

  • Diagnostic value of anti-human citrullinated fibrinogen ELISA and comparison with four other anti-citrullinated protein assays.

    Bert Vander Cruyssen;Tineke Cantaert;Leonor Nogueira;Cyril Clavel

  • TRAPID: an efficient online tool for the functional and comparative analysis of de novo RNA-Seq transcriptomes

    Michiel Van Bel;Sebastian Proost;Sebastian Proost;Christophe Van Neste;Dieter Deforce

  • Mass spectrometry-based proteomics as a tool to identify biological matrices in forensic science

    Katleen Van Steendam;Marlies De Ceuleneer;Maarten Dhaenens;David Van Hoofstat

  • Complete nucleotide sequence of CTX-M-15-plasmids from clinical Escherichia coli isolates: insertional events of transposons and insertion sequences

    Annemieke Smet;Filip Van Nieuwerburgh;Tom T. M. Vandekerckhove;An Martel

  • Erratum: Genome-wide association study of obsessive-compulsive disorder

    S E Stewart;D Yu;J M Scharf;B M Neale

Frequent Co-Authors

Filip Van Nieuwerburgh
Filip Van Nieuwerburgh Ghent University
Dirk Elewaut
Dirk Elewaut Ghent University
Freddy Haesebrouck
Freddy Haesebrouck Ghent University
Damiaan Denys
Damiaan Denys University of Amsterdam
Susana Lopes
Susana Lopes Leiden University Medical Center
Ann Van Soom
Ann Van Soom Ghent University
Carlos Van Peteghem
Carlos Van Peteghem Ghent University
Jo Vandesompele
Jo Vandesompele Ghent University
Frank Pasmans
Frank Pasmans Ghent University
Richard Ducatelle
Richard Ducatelle Ghent University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Biology or Biochemistry, there are several alternative and complementary online degree options and careers to consider. Many graduates find exciting roles in health information management, medical coding, or billing—fields that blend science with technology and healthcare administration.

Earning an online health information management degree is a popular choice for those seeking flexible programs with strong job prospects. Careers in this area are in high demand as healthcare systems require skilled professionals to manage patient data securely and accurately.

If you are considering medical coding, it is important to understand the differences in medical coding certification types, such as CPC vs. CCS. Each brings unique opportunities, costs, and salary expectations.

Prospective medical coders can explore typical medical.coder salary ranges and career advancement possibilities online. As the healthcare industry grows, the medical billing and coding outlook remains positive, offering job stability and remote work options for qualified professionals.

Best Scientists Citing Dieter Deforce

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles