World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
52
Citations
10100
World Ranking
5009
National Ranking
2747

Neuroscience

D-Index
54
Citations
10932
World Ranking
4914
National Ranking
2205

Matthew S. Panizzon publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew S. Panizzon sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 273 publications — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Matthew S. Panizzon D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew S. Panizzon sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Matthew S. Panizzon is affiliated with the University of California, San Diego, United States. Their research predominantly falls within the field of Medicine, with specialized focus in Psychiatry and Mental Health, Cognitive Neuroscience, Genetics, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, and Physiology.

The scientist's work centers on topics such as Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research, Functional Brain Connectivity Studies, Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications, Alzheimer's disease research and treatments, Genetic Associations and Epidemiology, Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging, and Cognitive Abilities and Testing.

Among recent publications authored or coauthored by Panizzon are the following:

  • "Sex differences in Alzheimer's-related Tau biomarkers and a mediating effect of testosterone" (2020), published in Biology of Sex Differences
  • "MRI-assessed locus coeruleus integrity is heritable and associated with multiple cognitive domains, mild cognitive impairment, and daytime dysfunction" (2021), published in Alzheimer s & Dementia
  • "African ancestry GWAS of dementia in a large military cohort identifies significant risk loci" (2022), published in Molecular Psychiatry
  • "Cognitive Reserve and Related Constructs: A Unified Framework Across Cognitive and Brain Dimensions of Aging" (2022), published in Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
  • "The role of testosterone, the androgen receptor, and hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis in depression in ageing Men" (2022), published in Reviews in Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Panizzon include:

  • William S. Kremen
  • Carol E. Franz
  • Jeremy A. Elman
  • Michael J. Lyons
  • Chandra A. Reynolds

Publication venues commonly featuring Panizzon's research are:

  • Alzheimer s & Dementia
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Journal of Alzheimer s Disease
  • Molecular Psychiatry
  • Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience

Best Publications

  • Distinct Genetic Influences on Cortical Surface Area and Cortical Thickness

    Matthew S. Panizzon;Christine Fennema-Notestine;Lisa T. Eyler;Terry L. Jernigan

  • International meta-analysis of PTSD genome-wide association studies identifies sex- and ancestry-specific genetic risk loci

    Caroline M. Nievergelt;Caroline M. Nievergelt;Adam X. Maihofer;Adam X. Maihofer;Torsten Klengel;Torsten Klengel;Elizabeth G. Atkinson;Elizabeth G. Atkinson

  • Hierarchical Genetic Organization of Human Cortical Surface Area

    Chi-Hua Chen;E. D. Gutierrez;Wes Thompson;Matthew S. Panizzon

  • Development and aging of cortical thickness correspond to genetic organization patterns.

    Anders Martin Fjell;Anders Martin Fjell;Håkon Grydeland;Stine Kleppe Krogsrud;Inge Kasbohm Amlien

  • Genetic and environmental influences on the size of specific brain regions in midlife: the VETSA MRI study.

    William S. Kremen;Elizabeth Prom-Wormley;Matthew S. Panizzon;Lisa T. Eyler;Lisa T. Eyler

  • Genetic topography of brain morphology

    Chi Hua Chen;Mark Fiecas;E. D. Gutiérrez;Matthew S. Panizzon

  • Neurodevelopmental origins of lifespan changes in brain and cognition.

    Kristine B Walhovd;Kristine B Walhovd;Stine Kleppe Krogsrud;Inge Kasbohm Amlien;Hauke Bartsch

  • A Comparison of Heritability Maps of Cortical Surface Area and Thickness and the Influence of Adjustment for Whole Brain Measures: A Magnetic Resonance Imaging Twin Study

    Lisa T. Eyler;Chi Hua Chen;Matthew S. Panizzon;Christine Fennema-Notestine

  • Influence of young adult cognitive ability and additional education on later-life cognition.

    William S. Kremen;William S. Kremen;Asad Beck;Asad Beck;Jeremy A. Elman;Daniel E. Gustavson

  • Impulsiveness, impulsive aggression, personality disorder, and spousal violence.

    Daniel W Edwards;Charles L Scott;Richard M Yarvis;Cheryl L Paizis

  • Cortical Thickness Is Influenced by Regionally Specific Genetic Factors

    Lars M. Rimol;Lars M. Rimol;Matthew S. Panizzon;Christine Fennema-Notestine;Lisa T. Eyler;Lisa T. Eyler

  • Genetic influences on cortical regionalization in the human brain.

    Chi-Hua Chen;Matthew S. Panizzon;Lisa T. Eyler;Lisa T. Eyler;Terry L. Jernigan

  • Genome-wide association analyses identify 95 risk loci and provide insights into the neurobiology of post-traumatic stress disorder.

    Unknown

  • Neuropsychological consequences of regular marijuana use: A twin study

    M. J. Lyons;J. L. Bar;M. S. Panizzon;R. Toomey

  • Genes Determine Stability and the Environment Determines Change in Cognitive Ability During 35 Years of Adulthood

    Michael J. Lyons;Timothy P. York;Carol E. Franz;Michael D. Grant

  • Pupillary Responses as a Biomarker of Early Risk for Alzheimer's Disease.

    Eric L. Granholm;Matthew S. Panizzon;Jeremy A. Elman;Amy J. Jak

  • Cross-sectional and 35-year longitudinal assessment of salivary cortisol and cognitive functioning: The Vietnam Era Twin Study of Aging

    Carol E. Franz;Robert C. O’Brien;Richard L. Hauger;Richard L. Hauger;Sally P. Mendoza

  • Resting State Abnormalities of the Default Mode Network in Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

    Lisa T Eyler;Jeremy A Elman;Sean N Hatton;Sarah Gough

  • A twin study of smoking, nicotine dependence, and major depression in men.

    Michael Lyons;Brian Hitsman;Hong Xian;Matthew S. Panizzon

  • Salivary cortisol and prefrontal cortical thickness in middle-aged men: A twin study

    William S. Kremen;William S. Kremen;Robert C. O'Brien;Matthew S. Panizzon;Elizabeth Prom-Wormley

  • The Genetic Association Between Neocortical Volume and General Cognitive Ability Is Driven by Global Surface Area Rather Than Thickness

    Eero Vuoksimaa;Matthew S. Panizzon;Chi Hua Chen;Mark Fiecas

  • Use of an Alzheimer's disease polygenic risk score to identify mild cognitive impairment in adults in their 50s.

    Mark W. Logue;Mark W. Logue;Matthew S. Panizzon;Jeremy A. Elman;Nathan A. Gillespie

Frequent Co-Authors

William S. Kremen
William S. Kremen University of California, San Diego
Carol E. Franz
Carol E. Franz University of California, San Diego
Michael J. Lyons
Michael J. Lyons Boston University
Anders M. Dale
Anders M. Dale J. Craig Venter Institute
Hong Xian
Hong Xian Saint Louis University
Amy J. Jak
Amy J. Jak University of California, San Diego
Michael C. Neale
Michael C. Neale Virginia Commonwealth University
Christine Fennema-Notestine
Christine Fennema-Notestine University of California, San Diego
Richard L. Hauger
Richard L. Hauger University of California, San Diego
Kristen C. Jacobson
Kristen C. Jacobson University of Chicago

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As interest in neuroscience grows, students now have more educational options thanks to online programs. Exploring an online bachelor's degree can provide the flexibility to study neuroscience or related fields from anywhere, which is perfect for busy schedules or those balancing work and study.

For students considering future earnings, it’s smart to research the highest paying degrees in the world and how they overlap with careers in neuroscience. Some neuroscience-related fields—including biotech, pharmaceuticals, and healthcare—are among the highest paying jobs for college graduates.

Affordability is also a key concern. Many cheap online colleges that accept fafsa make it easier to pursue neuroscience degrees without incurring huge debt. Always compare tuition, financial aid opportunities, and the value of your chosen major to ensure a smart investment in your future career.

Best Scientists Citing Matthew S. Panizzon

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles