World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
83
Citations
24100
World Ranking
15657
National Ranking
7881

Richard L. Hauger publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard L. Hauger sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 271 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Richard L. Hauger D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard L. Hauger sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 83 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Richard L. Hauger is affiliated with the University of California, San Diego in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields within medicine and molecular biology, focusing on genetics, epidemiology, psychiatry, and related biomedical disciplines.

The primary fields of study for Hauger include Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with significant contributions in several subfields such as Genetics, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Molecular Biology, Psychiatry and Mental Health, and Epidemiology.

The scientist's work covers a broad spectrum of topics, including:

  • Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
  • Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Sexual Differentiation and Disorders
  • Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies

Richard L. Hauger has authored or contributed to several recent papers, demonstrating a focus on pharmacology, cognitive decline, kidney injury, and neurodegenerative diseases. Notable recent publications include:

  • THE CONCISE GUIDE TO PHARMACOLOGY 2021/22: G protein-coupled receptors, 2021, British Journal of Pharmacology
  • The Concise Guide to PHARMACOLOGY 2023/24: G protein-coupled receptors, 2023, British Journal of Pharmacology
  • MRI-assessed locus coeruleus integrity is heritable and associated with multiple cognitive domains, mild cognitive impairment, and daytime dysfunction, 2021, Alzheimer s & Dementia
  • APOL1 Risk Variants, Acute Kidney Injury, and Death in Participants With African Ancestry Hospitalized With COVID-19 From the Million Veteran Program, 2022, JAMA Internal Medicine
  • African ancestry GWAS of dementia in a large military cohort identifies significant risk loci, 2022, Molecular Psychiatry

The scientist collaborates frequently with a number of researchers, including Matthew S. Panizzon, Julie A. Lynch, Mark W. Logue, Meghana S. Pagadala, and Hannah Carter, with collaboration counts ranging from 22 to 46 joint works.

Publications have appeared predominantly in venues such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Alzheimer's & Dementia, Journal of Clinical Oncology, Alzheimer's Research & Therapy, and JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

Best Publications

  • Cortisol levels during human aging predict hippocampal atrophy and memory deficits.

    Sonia J. Lupien;Mony de Leon;Susan de Santi;Antonio Convit

  • The CRF peptide family and their receptors: yet more partners discovered.

    Frank M. Dautzenberg;Richard L Hauger

  • Working memory is more sensitive than declarative memory to the acute effects of corticosteroids: a dose-response study in humans.

    Sonia J. Lupien;Christian J. Gillin;Richard L. Hauger

  • Genetic variation in human NPY expression affects stress response and emotion

    Zhifeng Zhou;Guanshan Zhu;Guanshan Zhu;Ahmad R. Hariri;Mary Anne Enoch

  • Effects of sleep and sleep deprivation on interleukin-6, growth hormone, cortisol, and melatonin levels in humans.

    Laura Redwine;Richard L. Hauger;J. Christian Gillin;Michael Irwin

  • Stress-induced declarative memory impairment in healthy elderly subjects: relationship to cortisol reactivity.

    S. J. Lupien;S. J. Lupien;S. Gaudreau;B. M. Tchiteya;F. Maheu

  • Cerebrospinal Fluid Vasopressin Levels: Correlates With Aggression and Serotonin Function in Personality-Disordered Subjects

    Emil F. Coccaro;Richard J. Kavoussi;Richard L. Hauger;Thomas B. Cooper

  • Corticotropin Releasing Factor (CRF) Receptor Signaling in the Central Nervous System: New Molecular Targets

    Richard L. Hauger;Victoria Risbrough;Olaf Brauns;Frank M. Dautzenberg

  • THE CONCISE GUIDE TO PHARMACOLOGY 2021/22: G protein-coupled receptors

    Stephen P.H. Alexander;Arthur Christopoulos;Anthony P. Davenport;Eamonn Kelly

  • International Union of Pharmacology. XXXVI. Current Status of the Nomenclature for Receptors for Corticotropin-Releasing Factor and Their Ligands

    Richard L. Hauger;Dimitri E. Grigoriadis;Mary F. Dallman;Paul M. Plotsky

  • Plasma neuropeptide-Y concentrations in humans exposed to military survival training.

    Charles A Morgan;Sheila Wang;Steven M Southwick;Ann Rasmusson

  • A new concept for control of the estrous cycle of the ewe based on the temporal relationships between luteinizing hormone estradiol and progesterone in peripheral serum and evidence that progesterone inhibits tonic LH secretion.

    Richard L. Hauger;Fred J. Karsch;Douglas L. Foster

  • Neuropeptide-Y, cortisol, and subjective distress in humans exposed to acute stress: replication and extension of previous report.

    Charles A Morgan;Ann M Rasmusson;Sheila Wang;Gary Hoyt

  • Chronic life stress alters sympathetic, neuroendocrine, and immune responsivity to an acute psychological stressor in humans

    Jennifer L. Pike;Tom L. Smith;Richard L. Hauger;Perry M. Nicassio

  • Low baseline and yohimbine-stimulated plasma neuropeptide Y (NPY) levels in combat-related PTSD

    Ann M Rasmusson;Richard L Hauger;Charles A Morgan;J.Douglas Bremner

  • Prevalence and distinct correlates of anxiety, substance, and combined comorbidity in a multi-site public sector sample with bipolar disorder.

    Mark S. Bauer;Lori Altshuler;Denise R. Evans;Thomas Beresford

  • Neuropeptide Y and natural killer cell activity: findings in depression and Alzheimer caregiver stress.

    Michael Irwin;Marvin Brown;Thomas Patterson;Richard Hauger

  • Corticotropin-releasing factor receptors and pituitary adrenal responses during immobilization stress

    Richard L. Hauger;Monica A. Millan;Marge Lorang;James P. Harwood

  • Longitudinal analysis of multiple indicators of health decline among spousal caregivers.

    William S. Shaw;Thomas L. Patterson;Thomas L. Patterson;Shirley J. Semple;Shirley J. Semple;Sandy Ho;Sandy Ho

  • CRF receptor regulation and sensitization of ACTH responses to acute ether stress during chronic intermittent immobilization stress.

    Richard L. Hauger;Marge Lorang;Michael Irwin;Greti Aguilera

Frequent Co-Authors

William S. Kremen
William S. Kremen University of California, San Diego
Carol E. Franz
Carol E. Franz University of California, San Diego
Matthew S. Panizzon
Matthew S. Panizzon University of California, San Diego
Michael J. Lyons
Michael J. Lyons Boston University
Michael R. Irwin
Michael R. Irwin University of California, Los Angeles
Hong Xian
Hong Xian Saint Louis University
Kristen C. Jacobson
Kristen C. Jacobson University of Chicago
Dewleen G. Baker
Dewleen G. Baker University of California, San Diego
Sonia J. Lupien
Sonia J. Lupien University of Montreal
Greti Aguilera
Greti Aguilera National Institutes of Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring careers related to medicine in the USA offers a variety of flexible, online academic options for different backgrounds and goals. Those with a diploma or associate’s in nursing can save on tuition by enrolling in one of the cheapest rn to bsn online programs, making advanced nursing credentials more attainable.

For individuals who hold a bachelor’s degree in a non-nursing field but wish to become nurses, consider online msn programs for non nurses. These direct-entry options can accelerate your pathway to a master’s degree in nursing and open the door to higher-level clinical positions.

If you’re looking for a streamlined entry into nursing, review a list of online adn programs with flexible admissions. These Associate Degree in Nursing (ADN) programs are often the quickest way to start a nursing career.

Alternatively, allied health careers are an excellent choice for students seeking non-clinical opportunities. The best medical billing and coding schools online provide training in a field with strong job prospects—and often include financial aid options.

Best Scientists Citing Richard L. Hauger

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles