World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Business and Management 38 1820 1703 751 687 94 10069
Economics and Finance 38 2492 2254 1404 1234 96 10069

Mark Bergen publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mark Bergen between 1992 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mark Bergen published across 34 years, from 1992 to 2025, averaging 3.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 2005. 4 of the 113 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1992 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 2005. 1992: 4 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 1 publication 1995: 2 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 5 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 12 publications 2006: 10 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 0 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 0 publications 2014: 1 publication 2015: 1 publication 2016: 2 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 1 publication 2022: 3 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 0 publications 2025: 4 publications
1992 2025

113 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mark Bergen: publications per year, 1992 to 2025
Year Publications
1992 4
1993 1
1994 1
1995 2
1996 3
1997 4
1998 2
1999 3
2000 1
2001 5
2002 7
2003 9
2004 4
2005 12
2006 10
2007 6
2008 4
2009 6
2010 6
2011 0
2012 8
2013 0
2014 1
2015 1
2016 2
2017 2
2018 0
2019 0
2020 1
2021 1
2022 3
2023 0
2024 0
2025 4
Total 113
Download as CSV

Mark Bergen publications per year - data summary

  • Mark Bergen, a Business and Management scholar from University of Minnesota, has 113 publications recorded across 34 years, from 1992 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1992 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2005, with 12 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1993, 1994, 2000, 2014 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • 6 of the 34 years in the span carry no publications at all (2011, 2013, 2018, 2019 and others).
  • The rate of publication averages 3.3 papers per year over the whole span, or 4.0 per year counting only the 28 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 8 publications, 7% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1992-2003: 42 publications (3.5 per year); 2004-2015: 58 publications (4.8 per year); 2016-2025: 13 publications (1.3 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is declining.

Mark Bergen publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Bergen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 82 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 35–39 to 436+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 122. Most scientists, 122, have 95–99 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 90–94 publications, is where this scientist sits. 35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientist 435 publications: 1 scientist 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35–39 publications 436+

This scientist: 94 publications — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
35–39 2
40–44 2
45–49 5
50–54 20
55–59 39
60–64 66
65–69 52
70–74 80
75–79 83
80–84 116
85–89 94
90–94 111 94
95–99 122
100–104 104
105–109 113
110–114 96
115–119 97
120–124 112
125–129 93
130–134 79
135–139 69
140–144 80
145–149 81
150–154 85
155–159 50
160–164 74
165–169 61
170–174 40
175–179 44
180–184 47
185–189 59
190–194 35
195–199 37
200–204 49
205–209 48
210–214 34
215–219 31
220–224 37
225–229 34
230–234 25
235–239 28
240–244 34
245–249 28
250–254 23
255–259 22
260–264 11
265–269 16
270–274 23
275–279 12
280–284 16
285–289 10
290–294 12
295–299 12
300–304 8
305–309 13
310–314 13
315–319 6
320–324 10
325–329 9
330–334 7
335–339 10
340–344 10
345–349 7
350–354 4
355–359 10
360–364 3
365–369 7
370–374 2
375–379 8
380–384 4
385–389 5
390–394 5
395–399 2
400–404 2
405–409 4
410–414 3
415–419 2
420–424 5
425–429 3
430–434 1
435 1
436+ 100
Download as CSV

Mark Bergen publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 3,017 Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 82 ranges running from 35–39 to 436+ publications.
  • Mark Bergen, a Business and Management scholar from University of Minnesota, records 94 publications - the 22nd percentile of the discipline.
  • 22% of ranked Business and Management scientists score the same or lower than Mark Bergen, and about 78% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 135–139 publications range, and Mark Bergen ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 95–99 publications, holding 122 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 52% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 135–139 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 436 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (3% of the field).

Mark Bergen D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Bergen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 60 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 89+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 171. Most scientists, 171, have 32 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 156
31 159
32 171
33 161
34 135
35 124
36 114
37 111
38 103 38
39 89
40 81
41 97
42 80
43 69
44 68
45 63
46 54
47 69
48 50
49 58
50 54
51 62
52 54
53 43
54 49
55 35
56 40
57 44
58 34
59 29
60 48
61 32
62 30
63 22
64 22
65 19
66 20
67 18
68 17
69 21
70 20
71 19
72 14
73 10
74 16
75 24
76 13
77 19
78 8
79 6
80 4
81 12
82 7
83 7
84 6
85 10
86 4
87 11
88 6
89+ 96
Download as CSV

Mark Bergen D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 3,017 Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 60 ranges running from 30 to 89+ D-Index.
  • Mark Bergen, a Business and Management scholar from University of Minnesota, records 38 D-Index - the 41st percentile of the discipline.
  • 41% of ranked Business and Management scientists score the same or lower than Mark Bergen, and about 59% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 42 D-Index range, and Mark Bergen ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 32 D-Index, holding 171 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 57% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 44 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more, 96 scientists in all (3% of the field).

Overview

Mark Bergen is affiliated with the University of Minnesota in the United States. Their research spans various fields within economics, econometrics, and finance, with particular focus on auction theory, monetary policy, and educational innovations.

The main fields of study for this researcher include:

  • Economics, Econometrics and Finance

The subfields of study reflect a multidisciplinary approach, combining economic theory with practical applications and management sciences:

  • Management Science and Operations Research
  • Information Systems
  • Strategy and Management
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance
  • Economics and Econometrics

Main topics covered in their work indicate thematic clusters on market mechanisms, policy impacts, and education-related economic aspects:

  • Auction Theory and Applications
  • Monetary Policy and Economic Impact
  • Educational Innovations and Challenges
  • Engineering Education and Technology
  • Foreign Language Teaching Methods
  • Digital Platforms and Economics
  • Business Strategy and Innovation

Mark Bergen has contributed a combination of solo and collaborative papers. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Sourav Ray
  • Elliot Charette
  • Weihong Zhao
  • Daniel Lévy
  • Haipeng Chen

Hierarchically prominent venues for their publications include:

  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Journal of Physics Conference Series
  • Economics Letters

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Mark Bergen:

  • "Customization of open-source solutions on the example of the LMS Moodle distance learning platform", 2021, Journal of Physics Conference Series
  • "When Half-Truths Aren't Half-Bad: Sale Reps' Selective Underreporting to Facilitate Market Exchange", 2020, SSRN Electronic Journal
  • "3 Lessons from Hyperinflationary Periods", 2022, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Asymmetric Price Adjustment Over the Business Cycle", 2025, SSRN Electronic Journal
  • "Asymmetric price adjustment over the business cycle", 2025, SSRN Electronic Journal

Best Publications

  • Agency Relationships in Marketing: A Review of the Implications and Applications of Agency and Related Theories:

    Mark Bergen;Shantanu Dutta;Orville C. Walker

  • Scanning dynamic competitive landscapes: a market-based and resource-based framework

    Margaret A. Peteraf;Mark E. Bergen

  • Quick Response in Manufacturer-Retailer Channels

    Ananth V. Iyer;Mark E. Bergen

  • Managerial and Customer Costs of Price Adjustment: Direct Evidence from Industrial Markets

    Mark J. Zbaracki;Mark Ritson;Daniel Levy;Shantanu Dutta

  • The Magnitude of Menu Costs: Direct Evidence from Large U. S. Supermarket Chains

    Daniel Levy;Mark Bergen;Shantanu Dutta;Robert Venable

  • Pricing process as a capability: a resource‐based perspective

    Shantanu Dutta;Mark J. Zbaracki;Mark Bergen

  • Agency Relationships in Marketing: A Review of the Implications and Applications of Agency and Related Theories

    Unknown

  • Competitor identification and competitor analysis: a broad-based managerial approach

    Mark Bergen;Margaret A. Peteraf

  • Price Premium Variations as a Consequence of Buyers' Lack of Information

    Akshay R. Rao;Mark E. Bergen

  • Understanding Dual Distribution: The Case of Reps and House Accounts

    Shantanu Dutta;Mark Bergen;Jan B. Heide;George John

  • Understanding cooperative advertising participation rates in conventional channels

    Mark E Bergen;George John

  • When Truces Collapse: A Longitudinal Study of Price-Adjustment Routines

    Mark J. Zbaracki;Mark Bergen

  • Branded Variants: A Retail Perspective

    Mark Bergen;Shantanu Dutta;Steven M. Shugan

  • Menu costs, posted prices, and multiproduct retailers

    Shantanu Dutta;Mark E Bergen;Daniel Levy;Daniel Levy;Robert Venable

  • The Governance of Exclusive Territories When Dealers can Bootleg

    Shantanu Dutta;Mark Bergen;George John

  • Pricing as a Strategic Capability

    Shantanu Dutta;Mark E. Bergen;Daniel Levy;Mark Ritson

  • How Does Enforcement Deter Gray Market Incidence

    Kersi D. Antia;Mark E. Bergen;Shantanu Dutta;Robert J. Fisher

  • Price Flexibility in Channels of Distribution: Evidence from Scanner Data

    Shantanu Dutta;Mark Bergen;Daniel Levy

  • Competing with gray markets

    Kersi D. Antia;Shantanu Dutta;Mark E. Bergen

  • Price Points and Price Rigidity

    Daniel Levy;Daniel Levy;Dongwon Lee;Haipeng Allan Chen;Robert J. Kauffman

  • Heterogeneity in price rigidity: Evidence from a case study using microlevel data

    Daniel Levy;Daniel Levy;Shantanu Dutta;Mark Bergen

  • Scanning Dynamic Competitive Landscapes: A Market-based and Resource-based Framework

    Margaret A. Peteraf;Mark E. Bergen

Frequent Co-Authors

Daniel Levy
Daniel Levy National Institutes of Health
Robert J. Kauffman
Robert J. Kauffman Singapore Management University
Jan B. Heide
Jan B. Heide University of Wisconsin–Madison
Robert B. Barsky
Robert B. Barsky National Bureau of Economic Research
Paul H. Rubin
Paul H. Rubin Emory University
Madhubalan Viswanathan
Madhubalan Viswanathan Loyola Marymount University
Shantanu Dutta
Shantanu Dutta University of Ottawa
Steven M. Shugan
Steven M. Shugan University of Florida
Mary Jo Hatch
Mary Jo Hatch University of Virginia
Majken Schultz
Majken Schultz Copenhagen Business School

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Economics and Finance in the USA opens doors to a wide range of online degree and career options, especially in today's digital-first job market. Online MBA programs have become increasingly popular, offering flexibility for working professionals. For those budget-conscious, exploring options like an online mba under 25k can lead to cost-effective advancement without compromising quality.

Alongside traditional business paths, digital industries are booming. Pursuing a digital marketing and social media degree prepares graduates for careers in fast-growing fields such as social media management, content strategy, and brand development.

The hospitality industry also values economic and financial expertise. For those interested in service leadership, a online hospitality management degree provides specialized knowledge, combining business fundamentals with industry-specific skills.

Quality accreditation is essential for business degrees. Students seeking a quality credential at a great value should consider the cheapest online mba aacsb programs, ensuring strong academic standards and better career opportunities.

Best Scientists Citing Mark Bergen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles