World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
73
Citations
14376
World Ranking
6082
National Ranking
2861

Ulrich Rodeck publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ulrich Rodeck sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 201 publications — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Ulrich Rodeck D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ulrich Rodeck sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 73 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ulrich Rodeck is affiliated with Thomas Jefferson University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine, with a particular focus on Oncology, Otorhinolaryngology, and Molecular Biology. A significant portion of their work relates to cancer-related studies, including cancer immunotherapy and biomarkers, head and neck cancer, and immune cell behavior within cancer environments.

Their notable recent papers include:

  • Cancer-Associated Fibroblast Density, Prognostic Characteristics, and Recurrence in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis (2020, Frontiers in Oncology)
  • miRNA- and cytokine-associated extracellular vesicles mediate squamous cell carcinomas (2020, Journal of Extracellular Vesicles)
  • Tadalafil Enhances Immune Signatures in Response to Neoadjuvant Nivolumab in Resectable Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (2021, Clinical Cancer Research)
  • Discordant Responses Between Primary Head and Neck Tumors and Nodal Metastases Treated With Neoadjuvant Nivolumab: Correlation of Radiographic and Pathologic Treatment Effect (2020, Frontiers in Oncology)
  • Caloric Restriction Impairs Regulatory T cells Within the Tumor Microenvironment After Radiation and Primes Effector T cells (2021, International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics)

Their publication record shows frequent contributions to several scientific journals, including:

  • International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics
  • Frontiers in Oncology
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • Journal of Extracellular Vesicles
  • Clinical Cancer Research

Ulrich Rodeck's research collaborations involve multiple frequent coauthors, reflecting interdisciplinary cooperation. Some key collaborators include Adam Luginbuhl, Larry A. Harshyne, Jennifer M. Johnson, Joseph Curry, and David M. Cognetti.

Their research covers a range of scientific topics that emphasize the biological mechanisms and treatment responses in cancer, notably:

  • Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • Head and Neck Cancer Studies
  • Peptidase Inhibition and Analysis
  • Immune cells in cancer
  • Tryptophan and brain disorders
  • Cancer Cells and Metastasis
  • Extracellular vesicles in disease

Ulrich Rodeck's work integrates clinical and molecular approaches to better understand tumor microenvironments, immune response modulation, and potential therapeutic enhancements. Their involvement in clinical cancer research and radiation oncology further underscores the translational aspect of their scientific pursuits.

Best Publications

  • Zebrafish: an emerging model system for human disease and drug discovery.

    G Kari;U Rodeck;A P Dicker

  • The EGF receptor - an essential regulator of multiple epidermal functions.

    Monika Jost;Csaba Kari;Ulrich Rodeck

  • Presence of Wilms' Tumor Gene (wt1) Transcripts and the WT1 Nuclear Protein in the Majority of Human Acute Leukemias

    Menssen Hd;Renkl Hj;Rodeck U;Maurer J

  • Mutant BRAF and MEK inhibitors regulate the tumor immune microenvironment via pyroptosis

    Dan A. Erkes;Weijia Cai;Ileine M. Sanchez;Timothy J. Purwin

  • REGULATION OF NK CELL FUNCTIONS BY TGF-BETA 1

    G Bellone;M Aste-Amezaga;G Trinchieri;U Rodeck

  • Biology of tumor progression in human melanocytes

    M Herlyn;W H Clark;U Rodeck;M L Mancianti

  • Tumor-Associated Transforming Growth Factor-β and Interleukin-10 Contribute to a Systemic Th2 Immune Phenotype in Pancreatic Carcinoma Patients

    Graziella Bellone;Anna Turletti;Elisa Artusio;Katia Mareschi

  • Human melanoma cell lines of primary and metastatic origin express the genes encoding the chains of platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) and produce a PDGF-like growth factor

    Bengt Westermark;Ann Johnsson;Ylva Paulsson;Christer Betsholtz

  • Wilms' Tumor 1 Susceptibility (WT1) Gene Products are Selectively Expressed in Malignant Mesothelioma

    K M Amin;L A Litzky;W R Smythe;A M Mooney

  • Targeting the epidermal growth factor receptor in cancer: apoptosis takes center stage.

    Csaba Kari;Tung O. Chan;Marlene Rocha de Quadros;Ulrich Rodeck

  • Chromatin binding of epidermal growth factor, nerve growth factor, and platelet-derived growth factor in cells bearing the appropriate surface receptors

    Ewa M. Rakowicz-Szulczynska;Ulrich Rodeck;Meenhard Herlyn;Hilary Koprowski

  • Transforming Growth Factor β Enhances Epithelial Cell Survival via Akt-dependent Regulation of FKHRL1

    Incheol Shin;Andrei V. Bakin;Ulrich Rodeck;Anne Brunet

  • Constitutive Expression of Multiple Growth Factor Genes by Melanoma Cells but Not Normal Melanocytes

    Ulrich Rodeck;Karl Melber;Roland Kath;Hans-Dietrich Menssen

  • EGF-R dependent regulation of keratinocyte survival

    Ulrich Rodeck;Monika Jost;Csaba Kari;Daw Tsun Shih

  • Tumor Growth Modulation by a Monoclonal Antibody to the Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor: Immunologically Mediated and Effector Cell-independent Effects

    Ulrich Rodeck;Meenhard Herlyn;Dorothee Herlyn;Carla Molthoff

  • In vivo Radioprotection by the Fullerene Nanoparticle DF-1 as Assessed in a Zebrafish Model

    Borbala Daroczi;Gabor Kari;Mary Frances McAleer;Jeffrey C. Wolf

  • Mechanism for elimination of a tumor suppressor: aberrant splicing of a brain-specific exon causes loss of function of Bin1 in melanoma.

    Kai Ge;James DuHadaway;Wei Du;Meenhard Herlyn

  • Binding of an antagonistic monoclonal antibody to an intact and fragmented EGF-receptor polypeptide☆

    Uma Murthy;Aruna Basu;Ulrich Rodeck;Meenhard Herlyn

  • Epidermal growth factor receptor-dependent control of keratinocyte survival and Bcl-xL expression through a MEK-dependent pathway.

    Monika Jost;Teresa M. Huggett;Csaba Kari;Lawrence H. Boise

  • Characteristics of cultured human melanocytes from different stages of tumor progression

    Ulrich Rodeck;Meenhard Herlyn

Frequent Co-Authors

Adam P. Dicker
Adam P. Dicker Thomas Jefferson University
Meenhard Herlyn
Meenhard Herlyn The Wistar Institute
Jouni Uitto
Jouni Uitto Thomas Jefferson University
William R. Davidson
William R. Davidson University of Georgia
Dorothee Herlyn
Dorothee Herlyn The Wistar Institute
Ubaldo E. Martinez-Outschoorn
Ubaldo E. Martinez-Outschoorn Thomas Jefferson University
Hilary Koprowski
Hilary Koprowski Thomas Jefferson University
Wolff Schmiegel
Wolff Schmiegel Ruhr University Bochum
Jonathan R. Brody
Jonathan R. Brody Thomas Jefferson University
Diana Whitaker-Menezes
Diana Whitaker-Menezes Thomas Jefferson University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology and Biochemistry in the USA offers a gateway to diverse career paths beyond traditional research roles. One in-demand avenue is in health information management, where professionals oversee patient records and secure medical data. Pursuing a bachelor's degree health information management online can provide you with key skills to advance in this growing field.

Many graduates transition into medical coding, which offers stable careers with competitive medical coder salary prospects. Certification plays a critical role in employability and salary potential—explore whether becoming a certified coding specialist is the right fit for you.

Healthcare organizations consistently seek qualified professionals for billing and coding roles, and recent trends confirm that is medical billing and coding in demand remains an important question with a positive outlook for job seekers. Whether your interest lies in laboratory sciences or health administration, online programs and certifications offer flexible, affordable pathways to rewarding healthcare careers.

Best Scientists Citing Ulrich Rodeck

Trending Scientists