World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Anne Mäkikangas

Anne Mäkikangas

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 44 6994 6522 54 52 99 7453

Anne Mäkikangas publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Anne Mäkikangas between 2003 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Anne Mäkikangas published across 23 years, from 2003 to 2025, averaging 5 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 2022. 15 of the 116 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 10. Peak 10 publications in 2022. 2003: 2 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 4 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 9 publications
2003 2025

116 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Anne Mäkikangas: publications per year, 2003 to 2025
Year Publications
2003 2
2004 2
2005 3
2006 2
2007 2
2008 1
2009 4
2010 6
2011 4
2012 6
2013 9
2014 8
2015 4
2016 7
2017 9
2018 5
2019 2
2020 4
2021 7
2022 10
2023 4
2024 6
2025 9
Total 116
Download as CSV

Anne Mäkikangas publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anne Mäkikangas sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 91–100 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 99 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713 99
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Anne Mäkikangas D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anne Mäkikangas sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44–45 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558 44
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Anne Mäkikangas is affiliated with Tampere University in Finland and has made multiple contributions in the field of psychology, particularly focusing on occupational health and organizational behavior. Their work encompasses a range of topics including job satisfaction, workplace health, and psychological well-being.

Key areas of research include:

  • Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Workplace Health and Well-being
  • COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Workaholism, Burnout, and Well-being
  • Research in Social Sciences
  • Healthcare Professionals' Stress and Burnout
  • Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction

Their main fields of study center around psychology, with subfields including general health professions, clinical psychology, social psychology, organizational behavior, human resource management, and education.

  • Psychology
  • General Health Professions
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Social Psychology
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
  • Education

Anne Mäkikangas has collaborated frequently with various coauthors, indicating consistent research partnerships. Their most frequent coauthors include:

  • Soile Juutinen
  • Ulla Kinnunen
  • Jaana-Piia Mäkiniemi
  • Kirsi Sjöblom
  • Atte Oksanen

Several academic journals have published Mäkikangas's work multiple times, with notable venues including:

  • Psykologia
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • Work & Stress
  • Challenges
  • Scandinavian Journal of Psychology

Significant recent publications showcasing the scope and themes of their research are:

  • Work engagement and its antecedents in remote work: A person-centered view, 2022, Work & Stress
  • Profiling development of burnout over eight years: relation with job demands and resources, 2020, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology
  • Loneliness and Well-Being during the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Moderating Roles of Personal, Social and Organizational Resources on Perceived Stress and Exhaustion among Finnish University Employees, 2021, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • A person-centered investigation of two dominant job crafting theoretical frameworks and their work-related implications, 2021, Journal of Vocational Behavior
  • Illegitimate tasks, job crafting and their longitudinal relationships with meaning of work, 2021, The International Journal of Human Resource Management

Best Publications

  • Psychosocial work stressors and well-being: self-esteem and optimism as moderators in a one-year longitudinal sample

    Anne Mäkikangas;Ulla Kinnunen

  • Cross-lagged associations between perceived external employability, job insecurity, and exhaustion: Testing gain and loss spirals according to the Conservation of Resources Theory

    Nele De Cuyper;Anne Mäkikangas;Ulla Kinnunen;Saija Mauno

  • Psychological consequences of fixed-term employment and perceived job insecurity among health care staff.

    Special Researcher Saija Mauno PhD;Ulla Kinnunen;Anne Mäkikangas;Jouko Nätti

  • Testing the effort-reward imbalance model among Finnish managers: the role of perceived organizational support.

    Ulla Kinnunen;Taru Feldt;Anne Mäkikangas

  • Work–family conflict and its relations to well-being: the role of personality as a moderating factor

    Ulla Kinnunen;Ad Vermulst;Jan Gerris;Anne Mäkikangas

  • The role of job resources in the relation between perceived employability and turnover intention: A prospective two-sample study

    Nele De Cuyper;Saija Mauno;Ulla Kinnunen;Anne Mäkikangas

  • Job resources and flow at work: Modelling the relationship via latent growth curve and mixture model methodology

    Anne Mäkikangas;Arnold B. Bakker;Kaisa Aunola;Evangelia Demerouti;Evangelia Demerouti

  • Self-esteem, dispositional optimism, and health: Evidence from cross-lagged data on employees

    Anne Mäkikangas;Ulla Kinnunen;Taru Feldt

  • The longitudinal development of employee well-being: a systematic review

    Anne Mäkikangas;Ulla Kinnunen;Taru Feldt;Wilmar Schaufeli

  • Does Personality Matter? A Review of Individual Differences in Occupational Well-Being

    Anne Mäkikangas;Taru Feldt;Ulla Kinnunen;Saija Mauno

  • The person-oriented approach to burnout: A systematic review

    Anne Mäkikangas;Ulla Kinnunen

  • Young managers' drive to thrive : A personal work goal approach to burnout and work engagement

    Katriina Hyvönen;Taru Feldt;Katariina Salmela-Aro;Ulla Kinnunen

  • Development trajectories of Finnish managers' work ability over a 10-year follow-up period.

    Taru Feldt;Katriina Hyvönen;Anne Mäkikangas;Ulla Kinnunen

  • The effects of unemployment and perceived job insecurity: a comparison of their association with psychological and somatic complaints, self‑rated health and life satisfaction

    Yannick Griep;Ulla Kinnunen;Jouko Nätti;Nele De Cuyper

  • Warr's scale of job-related affective well-being: A longitudinal examination of its structure and relationships with work characteristics

    Anne Mäkikangas;Taru Feldt;Ulla Kinnunen

  • Does job insecurity threaten who you are? Introducing a social identity perspective to explain well-being and performance consequences of job insecurity

    Eva Selenko;Anne Mäkikangas;Christopher B. Stride

  • Do low burnout and high work engagement always go hand in hand? Investigation of the energy and identification dimensions in longitudinal data

    Anne Mäkikangas;Taru Feldt;Ulla Kinnunen;Asko Tolvanen

  • Job crafting profiles and work engagement: A person-centered approach

    Unknown

  • How does job insecurity relate to self-reported job performance? Analysing curvilinear associations in a longitudinal sample

    Eva Selenko;Anne Mäkikangas;Saija Mauno;Saija Mauno;Ulla Kinnunen

  • Occupational well-being as a mediator between job insecurity and turnover intention: Findings at the individual and work department levels

    Saija Mauno;Nele De Cuyper;Asko Tolvanen;Ulla Kinnunen

  • Job demands and resources as antecedents of work engagement: A qualitative review and directions for future research.

    Saija Mauno;Ulla Kinnunen;Anne Mäkikangas;Taru Feldt

Frequent Co-Authors

Ulla Kinnunen
Ulla Kinnunen Tampere University
Saija Mauno
Saija Mauno Tampere University
Taru Feldt
Taru Feldt University of Jyväskylä
Asko Tolvanen
Asko Tolvanen University of Jyväskylä
Hans De Witte
Hans De Witte KU Leuven
Arnold B. Bakker
Arnold B. Bakker Erasmus University Rotterdam
Evangelia Demerouti
Evangelia Demerouti Eindhoven University of Technology
Jari J. Hakanen
Jari J. Hakanen Finnish Institute of Occupational Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Interested in a Psychology career but want flexible study options? Many students now pursue online degrees to launch careers like social work, counseling, and mental health services. However, it’s important to note that education and licensing requirements can vary significantly across the United States.

For example, the degree needed to be a social worker in Missouri typically involves earning at least a Bachelor’s in Social Work (BSW), but advanced positions may require a Master’s degree. Similarly, social worker education requirements in Montana include accredited degrees and meeting specific state licensing standards.

In Nebraska, there are specific social worker education requirements in Nebraska that outline necessary degrees and supervised experience. Likewise, those seeking to practice in Nevada should review the degree needed to be a social worker in Nevada.

Online psychology and social work programs can prepare you for diverse career pathways, but always ensure your program meets your state’s licensing criteria before enrolling.

Best Scientists Citing Anne Mäkikangas

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles