World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
42
Citations
14676
World Ranking
8159
National Ranking
3497

Patrick Pantel publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patrick Pantel sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 103 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Patrick Pantel D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patrick Pantel sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Patrick Pantel is affiliated with Facebook in the United States and conducts research primarily in the fields of Computer Science and Social Sciences. Their work integrates areas such as Information Systems, Artificial Intelligence, and Sociology and Political Science.

Their recent research includes the paper titled Preserving integrity in online social networks, published in 2022 in Communications of the ACM. This publication has attracted citations and contributes to understanding online social network dynamics.

Patrick Pantel collaborates frequently with several researchers, including:

  • Alon Halevy
  • Cristian Canton-Ferrer
  • Hao Ma
  • Umut Özertem
  • Marzieh Saeidi

Their publications have appeared in venues such as:

  • Communications of the ACM

Their research topics focus on areas involving:

  • Spam and Phishing Detection
  • Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting
  • Privacy, Security, and Data Protection

Patrick Pantel's work is situated at the intersection of technology and social science, studying the mechanisms that underpin trust, security, and integrity in digital environments.

Best Publications

  • From frequency to meaning: vector space models of semantics

    Peter D. Turney;Patrick Pantel

  • Discovering word senses from text

    Patrick Pantel;Dekang Lin

  • DIRT @SBT@discovery of inference rules from text

    Dekang Lin;Patrick Pantel

  • Espresso: Leveraging Generic Patterns for Automatically Harvesting Semantic Relations

    Patrick Pantel;Marco Pennacchiotti

  • Discovery of inference rules for question-answering

    Dekang Lin;Patrick Pantel

  • Representing Text for Joint Embedding of Text and Knowledge Bases

    Kristina Toutanova;Danqi Chen;Patrick Pantel;Hoifung Poon

  • Automatically Assessing Review Helpfulness

    Soo-Min Kim;Patrick Pantel;Tim Chklovski;Marco Pennacchiotti

  • VerbOcean: Mining the Web for Fine-Grained Semantic Verb Relations

    Timothy Chklovski;Patrick Pantel

  • Automatically Labeling Semantic Classes

    Patrick Pantel;Deepak Ravichandran

  • Web-Scale Distributional Similarity and Entity Set Expansion

    Patrick Pantel;Eric Crestan;Arkady Borkovsky;Ana-Maria Popescu

  • Randomized Algorithms and NLP: Using Locality Sensitive Hash Functions for High Speed Noun Clustering

    Deepak Ravichandran;Patrick Pantel;Eduard Hovy

  • Concept discovery from text

    Dekang Lin;Patrick Pantel

  • Document clustering with committees

    Patrick Pantel;Dekang Lin

  • Modeling Interestingness with Deep Neural Networks

    Jianfeng Gao;Patrick Pantel;Michael Gamon;Xiaodong He

  • A Statistical Corpus-Based Term Extractor

    Patrick Pantel;Dekang Lin

  • Smart selection of text spans

    Patrick Pantel;Michael Gamon;Ariel Damian Fuxman;Bernhard Kohlmeier

  • Induction of semantic classes from natural language text

    Dekang Lin;Patrick Pantel

  • Towards terascale knowledge acquisition

    Patrick Pantel;Deepak Ravichandran;Eduard Hovy

  • SpamCop: A Spam Classification & Organisation Program

    Patrick Pantel;Dekang Lin

  • Associating Search Queries and Entities

    Patrick Pantel;Ariel Damian Fuxman

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael Gamon
Michael Gamon Microsoft (United States)
Eduard Hovy
Eduard Hovy Carnegie Mellon University
Dekang Lin
Dekang Lin Google (United States)
Ahmed Hassan Awadallah
Ahmed Hassan Awadallah Microsoft (United States)
Li Deng
Li Deng Citadel
Ryen W. White
Ryen W. White Microsoft (United States)
Peter D. Turney
Peter D. Turney Ronin Institute
Andrei Z. Broder
Andrei Z. Broder Google (United States)
Evgeniy Gabrilovich
Evgeniy Gabrilovich Google (United States)
Marko Grobelnik
Marko Grobelnik Jožef Stefan Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education options in Computer Science opens doors for a wide variety of learners. For those concerned about admission requirements, some online colleges that accept 2.0 gpa make it possible to start your academic journey, even with less competitive grades. This flexibility allows more students to enter the field and pursue rewarding tech careers.

The demand for computer science skills also overlaps with other fields. If you’re interested in leveraging technology to address environmental challenges, earning an environmental engineering degree online can set you up for exciting careers at the intersection of technology and sustainability. Not sure about your career direction? Learn more about what can i do with an environmental science degree to explore diverse paths, from research to policy development.

Additionally, if you’re eager to launch your tech career quickly, consider one of the fastest computer science degree programs. These accelerated options help you earn your qualifications faster—ready to join the workforce or advance your expertise in record time.

Best Scientists Citing Patrick Pantel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles