World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
37
Citations
5350
World Ranking
8901
National Ranking
3191

Karl L. Mitchell publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Karl L. Mitchell sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 173 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

Karl L. Mitchell D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Karl L. Mitchell sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Overview

Karl L. Mitchell is affiliated with the California Institute of Technology in the United States. Their research focuses primarily on the fields of physics and astronomy, with a particular emphasis on astronomy and astrophysics. They have contributed to subfields including geophysics, aerospace engineering, molecular biology, and atmospheric science.

The scientist's main topics of study include astro and planetary science, planetary science and exploration, geomagnetism and paleomagnetism studies, geology and paleoclimatology research, stellar, planetary, and galactic studies, paleontology and stratigraphy of fossils, and high-pressure geophysics and materials.

Mitchell has published extensively in several scientific venues. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Abstracts with programs - Geological Society of America
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Planets
  • The Planetary Science Journal
  • Nature Astronomy
  • Earth and Space Science

Their recent papers demonstrate a focus on planetary missions, habitability, and planetary geophysics. Notable publications include:

  • QUEST: A New Frontiers Uranus orbiter mission concept study, 2020, Acta Astronautica
  • Sustained and comparative habitability beyond Earth, 2023, Nature Astronomy
  • Triton: Fascinating Moon, Likely Ocean World, Compelling Destination!, 2021, The Planetary Science Journal
  • Planetary Caves: A Solar System View of Processes and Products, 2022, Journal of Geophysical Research Planets
  • Bridge to the stars: A mission concept to an interstellar object, 2020, Planetary and Space Science

The scientist has collaborated frequently with multiple researchers. Their most frequent co-authors, listed by collaboration count, include:

  • Julie Castillo-Rogez
  • Tom Nordheim
  • Erin Leonard
  • Alan Whittington
  • J. Judson Wynne

Karl L. Mitchell's work intersects several interdisciplinary domains, bridging planetary science with physics and engineering disciplines. Their research contributions span both theoretical and applied topics, including mission concept studies and comparative planetology from a physics and biological perspective.

Best Publications

  • The lakes of Titan

    Ellen R. Stofan;Charles Elachi;Jonathan I. Lunine;Ralf D. Lorenz

  • The sand seas of Titan: Cassini RADAR observations of longitudinal dunes.

    R. D. Lorenz;S. Wall;J. Radebaugh;G. Boubin

  • Titan's inventory of organic surface materials

    Ralph D. Lorenz;Karl L. Mitchell;Randolph L. Kirk;Alexander G. Hayes

  • Cryovolcanic features on Titan's surface as revealed by the Cassini Titan Radar Mapper

    Rosaly M.C. Lopes;K. L. Mitchell;Ellen R. Stofan;Jonathan I. Lunine;Jonathan I. Lunine

  • Evidence from the Mars Express High Resolution Stereo Camera for a frozen sea close to Mars' equator

    John B. Murray;Jan-Peter Muller;Gerhard Neukum;Stephanie C. Werner

  • Cryovolcanism on Titan: New results from Cassini RADAR and VIMS

    R. M. C. Lopes;R. L. Kirk;K. L. Mitchell;A. LeGall

  • Fluvial channels on Titan: Initial Cassini RADAR observations

    Ralph D. Lorenz;Rosaly M. Lopes;Flora Paganelli;Jonathan I. Lunine

  • Generation of recent massive water floods at Cerberus Fossae, Mars by dike emplacement, cryospheric cracking, and confined aquifer groundwater release

    James W. Head;Lionel Wilson;Karl L. Mitchell

  • Distribution and interplay of geologic processes on Titan from Cassini radar data

    R.M.C. Lopes;E. R. Stofan;R. Peckyno;J. Radebaugh

  • Impact craters on Titan

    Charles A. Wood;Ralph Lorenz;Randy Kirk;Rosaly Lopes

  • Transient surface liquid in Titan’s polar regions from Cassini

    A. G. Hayes;O. Aharonson;J. I. Lunine;R. L. Kirk

  • Mars outflow channels: A reappraisal of the estimation of water flow velocities from water depths, regional slopes, and channel floor properties

    Lionel Wilson;Gil J. Ghatan;James W. Head;Karl L. Mitchell

  • Determining Titan surface topography from Cassini SAR data

    Bryan W. Stiles;Scott Hensley;Yonggyu Gim;David M. Bates

  • New estimates for Io eruption temperatures: Implications for the interior

    Laszlo Keszthelyi;Windy Jaeger;Moses Milazzo;Jani Radebaugh

  • Titan’s surface at 2.18-cm wavelength imaged by the Cassini RADAR radiometer: Results and interpretations through the first ten years of observation

    M.A. Janssen;A. Le Gall;R.M. Lopes;R.D. Lorenz

  • Selection of the landing site in Isidis Planitia of Mars probe Beagle 2

    J. C. Bridges;A. M. Seabrook;D. A. Rothery;J. R. Kim

  • Discovery of a flank caldera and very young glacial activity at Hecates Tholus, Mars

    Ernst Hauber;Stephan van Gasselt;Boris Ivanov;Stephanie Werner

  • Active shoreline of Ontario Lacus, Titan: A morphological study of the lake and its surroundings

    S. Wall;A. Hayes;Charlie S. Bristow;R. Lorenz

  • Titan's young surface: Initial impact crater survey by Cassini RADAR and model comparison

    R. D. Lorenz;C. A. Wood;J. I. Lunine;S. D. Wall

  • Laboratory measurements of cryogenic liquid alkane microwave absorptivity and implications for the composition of Ligeia Mare, Titan

    Karl L. Mitchell;Martin B. Barmatz;Corey S. Jamieson;Corey S. Jamieson;Ralph D. Lorenz

  • Formation of Ravi Vallis outflow channel, Mars: Morphological development, water discharge, and duration estimates

    Harald J. Leask;Lionel Wilson;Karl L. Mitchell;Karl L. Mitchell

  • Regional geomorphology and history of Titan's Xanadu province

    J. Radebaugh;R. D. Lorenz;S. D. Wall;R. L. Kirk

  • The lakes and seas of Titan

    Rosaly M.C. Lopes;Karl L. Mitchell;Stephen D. Wall;Giuseppe Mitri

  • The Lakes of Titan

    J. Lunine;E. Stofan;C. Elachi;R. Lorenz

Frequent Co-Authors

Rosaly M. C. Lopes
Rosaly M. C. Lopes California Institute of Technology
Jonathan I. Lunine
Jonathan I. Lunine Jet Propulsion Lab
Ellen R. Stofan
Ellen R. Stofan Smithsonian Institution
Jani Radebaugh
Jani Radebaugh Brigham Young University
Ralph D. Lorenz
Ralph D. Lorenz Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory
Bryan Stiles
Bryan Stiles Jet Propulsion Lab
Charles A. Wood
Charles A. Wood Planetary Science Institute
Randolph L. Kirk
Randolph L. Kirk United States Geological Survey
Howard A. Zebker
Howard A. Zebker Stanford University
Alexander G. Hayes
Alexander G. Hayes Cornell University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in Environmental Sciences often involves exploring a variety of educational pathways, including advanced online degrees. For those seeking doctoral-level education without the traditional research-heavy components, doctoral programs online no dissertation offer flexible options that emphasize practical application over extensive dissertation work.

It is essential to choose credible programs, and accredited eds to edd programs provide a reliable pathway ensuring quality education and recognized credentials. Accreditation matters when considering employment and further study opportunities, aligning academic rigor with professional standards.

For those interested in integrating social work aspects within environmental contexts, exploring dsw programs online can be valuable. These programs prepare students for leadership roles addressing community and environmental wellbeing, making them a relevant option for interdisciplinary careers.

Additionally, students seeking foundational knowledge with budget-friendly options might consider most affordable online general studies degree programs. These provide broad-based education that can complement specialized environmental studies or support diverse career pathways in sustainability and policy.

Best Scientists Citing Karl L. Mitchell

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles