World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
40
Citations
5698
World Ranking
9401
National Ranking
3983

Teruko Mitamura publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Teruko Mitamura sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 184 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Teruko Mitamura D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Teruko Mitamura sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Teruko Mitamura is affiliated with Carnegie Mellon University in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of Computer Science, with a primary focus on Artificial Intelligence and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Their research output includes 54 publications in Computer Science, with significant work in subfields such as Molecular Biology, General Social Sciences, and Electrical and Electronic Engineering.

Mitamura's research spans multiple main topics, including:

  • Topic Modeling
  • Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Human Pose and Action Recognition
  • Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
  • Biomedical Text Mining and Ontologies

The scientist has published in several frequent venues, notably:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • Proceedings of the 30th ACM International Conference on Multimedia

Recent papers by Teruko Mitamura include:

  • GSRFormer: Grounded Situation Recognition Transformer with Alternate Semantic Attention Refinement, 2022, Proceedings of the 30th ACM International Conference on Multimedia
  • Understanding the Role of Scene Graphs in Visual Question Answering, 2021, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • NAREOR: The Narrative Reordering Problem, 2022, Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • A Dataset and Baselines for Visual Question Answering on Art, 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • What is Your Data Worth to GPT? LLM-Scale Data Valuation with Influence Functions, 2024, arXiv (Cornell University)

Teruko Mitamura frequently collaborates with several coauthors, including:

  • Zhi-Qi Cheng
  • Adithya Pratapa
  • Kimihiro Hasegawa
  • Eduard Hovy
  • Varun Gangal

Best Publications

  • A Survey of Data Augmentation Approaches for NLP

    Steven Feng;Varun Gangal;Jason Wei;Sarath Chandar

  • What is the Jeopardy Model? A Quasi-Synchronous Grammar for QA

    Mengqiu Wang;Noah A. Smith;Teruko Mitamura

  • Integrated authoring and translation system

    Peggy M Anderson;Kathryn L Baker;Michael M Bauer;Nicholas D Brownlow

  • Easy Samples First: Self-paced Reranking for Zero-Example Multimedia Search

    Lu Jiang;Deyu Meng;Teruko Mitamura;Alexander G. Hauptmann

  • The KANT system: fast, accurate, high-quality translation in practical domains

    Eric H. Nyberg;Teruko Mitamura

  • An Efficient Interlingua Translation System for Multi-lingual Document Production

    Teruko Mitamura;Eric H. Nyberg;Jaime G. Carbonell

  • Controlled English for Knowledge-Based MT: Experience with the KANT System

    Teruko Mitamura;Eric H. Nyberg

  • Controlled Language for Multilingual Machine Translation

    Teruko Mitamura

  • The JAVELIN Question-Answering System at TREC 2002

    Eric Nyberg;Teruko Mitamura;Jaime G. Carbonell;James P. Callan

  • Committed Belief Annotation and Tagging

    Mona Diab;Lori Levin;Teruko Mitamura;Owen Rambow

  • Controlled Language for Multilingual Document Production: Experience with Caterpillar Technical English 1

    Christine Kamprath;Eric Adolphson;Teruko Mitamura;Eric Nyberg

  • Overview of NTCIR-9 RITE : Recognizing Inference in TExt

    Hideki Shima;Hiroshi Kanayama;Cheng-Wei Lee;Chuan-Jie Lin

  • Overview of TAC-KBP 2016 Event Nugget Track.

    Teruko Mitamura;Zhengzhong Liu;Eduard H. Hovy

  • Computer-based method and system for monolingual document development

    Jaime G. Carbonell;Sharlene L. Gallup;Timothy J. Harris;James W. Higdon

  • Overview of the NTCIR-7 ACLIA Tasks: Advanced Cross-Lingual Information Access

    Teruko Mitamura;Eric Nyberg;Hideki Shima;Tsuneaki Kato

  • Arabic morphology generation using a concatenative strategy

    Violetta Cavalli-Sforza;Abdelhadi Soudi;Teruko Mitamura

  • Events are Not Simple: Identity, Non-Identity, and Quasi-Identity

    Eduard Hovy;Teruko Mitamura;Felisa Verdejo;Jun Araki

  • The JAVELIN Question-Answering System at TREC 2003: A Multi-Strategy Approach with Dynamic Planning

    Eric H. Nyberg;Teruko Mitamura

  • Bridging the Ultimate Semantic Gap: A Semantic Search Engine for Internet Videos

    Lu Jiang;Shoou-I Yu;Deyu Meng;Teruko Mitamura

  • Supervised Within-Document Event Coreference using Information Propagation

    Zhengzhong Liu;Jun Araki;Eduard Hovy;Teruko Mitamura

  • Overview of the NTCIR-8 ACLIA Tasks: Advanced Cross-Lingual Information Access.

    Teruko Mitamura;Hideki Shima;Tetsuya Sakai;Noriko Kando

Frequent Co-Authors

Eric Nyberg
Eric Nyberg Carnegie Mellon University
Eduard Hovy
Eduard Hovy Carnegie Mellon University
Jaime G. Carbonell
Jaime G. Carbonell Carnegie Mellon University
Alexander G. Hauptmann
Alexander G. Hauptmann Carnegie Mellon University
Noriko Kando
Noriko Kando National Institute of Informatics
Bruce M. McLaren
Bruce M. McLaren Carnegie Mellon University
Florian Metze
Florian Metze Carnegie Mellon University
Bhiksha Raj
Bhiksha Raj Carnegie Mellon University
Richard M. Stern
Richard M. Stern Carnegie Mellon University
Deyu Meng
Deyu Meng Xi'an Jiaotong University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Computer Science in the USA opens doors to flexible and diverse online education options. Many students seek the fastest masters degree online to quickly advance their careers. Accelerated programs let you earn a graduate credential in less time—perfect for those eager to enter the workforce or switch fields efficiently.

For those looking for value and long-term prospects, choosing one of the most worthwhile masters degrees can be a game-changer. High-demand specialized programs in technology, data analytics, and software engineering often offer higher earning potential and job security.

Not everyone needs a graduate degree to launch their tech career. Many schools now offer 2 year online degrees in computer science and IT. These programs provide foundational skills and are ideal for those who want to enter the field quickly or plan to transfer credits to a bachelor’s program later.

No matter your educational goal, it’s smart to compare affordable online degree programs. Budget-friendly options mean you can gain valuable skills while minimizing student debt, making it easier to launch your computer science career with confidence.

Best Scientists Citing Teruko Mitamura

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles