World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
53
Citations
10298
World Ranking
4864
National Ranking
2266

Richard M. Stern publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard M. Stern sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 250 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 560 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 424 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 378 scientists 262–271 publications: 300 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 253 publications — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Richard M. Stern D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard M. Stern sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 984 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 969 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 765 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 517 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Richard M. Stern is affiliated with Carnegie Mellon University in the United States. Their research spans primarily the field of Computer Science, with a significant focus on signal processing and artificial intelligence. Additional subfields include geophysics, electrical and electronic engineering, and computational mechanics.

The main topics of their work cover speech and audio processing, speech recognition and synthesis, and music and audio processing. Their research also involves advanced adaptive filtering techniques, indoor and outdoor localization technologies, hearing loss and rehabilitation, and the study of random lasers and scattering media.

Richard M. Stern has contributed to several recent publications, including:

  • "Speedy light focusing through scattering media by a cooperatively FPGA-parameterized genetic algorithm" (2022), published in Optics Express
  • "A unified beamforming and source separation model for static and dynamic human-robot interaction" (2024), published in JASA Express Letters
  • "Improved Modulation-Domain Loss for Neural-Network-based Speech Enhancement" (2022), published in Interspeech 2022
  • "Discovery of a giant juvenile 3.3-3.1 Ga terrane in the Rae craton, Canada" (2022), published in Goldschmidt2022 abstracts
  • "Non causal deep learning based dereverberation" (2020), published in arXiv (Cornell University)

The frequent publication venues include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Goldschmidt2022 abstracts
  • Sensors
  • Geostandards and Geoanalytical Research
  • Optics Express

Collaborations form an important aspect of their research. Frequent coauthors are:

  • Néstor Becerra Yoma
  • Jorge Wuth
  • Rodrigo Mahú
  • Tyler Vuong
  • Alejandro Luzanto

Best Publications

  • An approach to cardiac arrhythmia analysis using hidden Markov models

    D.A. Coast;R.M. Stern;G.G. Cano;S.A. Briller

  • A vector Taylor series approach for environment-independent speech recognition

    P.J. Moreno;B. Raj;R.M. Stern

  • Power-normalized cepstral coefficients (PNCC) for robust speech recognition

    Chanwoo Kim;Richard M. Stern

  • Environmental robustness in automatic speech recognition

    A. Acero;R.M. Stern

  • Reconstruction of missing features for robust speech recognition

    Bhiksha Raj;Michael L. Seltzer;Richard M. Stern

  • Missing-feature approaches in speech recognition

    B. Raj;R.M. Stern

  • Multiple approaches to robust speech recognition.

    Richard M. Stern;Fu-Hua Liu;Yoshiaki Ohshima;Thomas M. Sullivan

  • Power-Normalized Cepstral Coefficients (PNCC) for robust speech recognition

    Chanwoo Kim;Richard M. Stern

  • Theory of binaural interaction based on auditory‐nerve data. IV. A model for subjective lateral position

    Richard M. Stern;H. Steven Colburn

  • Lateralization of complex binaural stimuli: A weighted‐image model

    Richard M. Stern;Andrew S. Zeiberg;Constantine Trahiotis

  • Efficient cepstral normalization for robust speech recognition

    Fu-Hua Liu;Richard M. Stern;Xuedong Huang;Alejandro Acero

  • A Bayesian Classifier for Spectrographic Mask Estimation for Missing Feature Speech Recognition

    Michael L. Seltzer;Bhiksha Raj;Richard M. Stern

  • Robust speech recognition by normalization of the acoustic space

    A. Acero;R.M. Stern

  • Robust signal-to-noise ratio estimation based on waveform amplitude distribution analysis.

    Chanwoo Kim;Richard M. Stern

  • Efficient joint compensation of speech for the effects of additive noise and linear filtering

    F.-H. Liu;A. Acero;R.M. Stern

  • Fast Computation of the Difference of Low-Pass Transform

    James L. Crowley;Richard M. Stern

  • Likelihood-maximizing beamforming for robust hands-free speech recognition

    M.L. Seltzer;B. Raj;R.M. Stern

  • On the effects of speech rate in large vocabulary speech recognition systems

    M.A. Siegler;R.M. Stern

  • Feature extraction for robust speech recognition based on maximizing the sharpness of the power distribution and on power flooring

    Chanwoo Kim;Richard M. Stern

  • Delta-spectral cepstral coefficients for robust speech recognition

    Kshitiz Kumar;Chanwoo Kim;Richard M. Stern

Frequent Co-Authors

Bhiksha Raj
Bhiksha Raj Carnegie Mellon University
Pedro J. Moreno
Pedro J. Moreno Google (United States)
Michael L. Seltzer
Michael L. Seltzer Facebook (United States)
Alejandro Acero
Alejandro Acero Apple (United States)
Alexander G. Hauptmann
Alexander G. Hauptmann Carnegie Mellon University
Florian Metze
Florian Metze Carnegie Mellon University
Teruko Mitamura
Teruko Mitamura Carnegie Mellon University
Constantine Trahiotis
Constantine Trahiotis University of Connecticut Health Center
Eric Nyberg
Eric Nyberg Carnegie Mellon University
H. Steven Colburn
H. Steven Colburn Boston University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring related online degrees offers flexible options for those interested in Computer Science careers. Many students seek accelerated education through shortest masters degree programs online, which can be completed in as little as one year. These fast-track programs help professionals upskill quickly and enter the workforce or progress in their current roles sooner.

It’s also important to consider the industry demand. Knowing which master's degree is most in demand in usa can guide your decision, ensuring you invest in a degree with strong employment prospects. Computer Science consistently ranks among the most valuable graduate studies in this regard.

For those just starting out, an associate's degree online provides a solid entry point. These programs typically offer foundational knowledge and can move you toward bachelor’s study or entry-level jobs with lower tuition costs.

Affordability is a key concern. Be sure to review the cheapest online colleges to find quality programs that fit your budget. With many pathways and options, you can create a study plan that matches your timelines, goals, and financial situation.

Best Scientists Citing Richard M. Stern

Trending Scientists