World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Harvey J. Cohen

Harvey J. Cohen

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 138 1830 1702 1043 958 812 72298

Harvey J. Cohen publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Harvey J. Cohen between 1959 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Harvey J. Cohen published across 67 years, from 1959 to 2025, averaging 13.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 44 publications in 2016. 30 of the 876 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1959 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 44. Peak 44 publications in 2016. 1959: 1 publication 1960: 5 publications 1961: 2 publications 1962: 1 publication 1963: 0 publications 1964: 1 publication 1965: 0 publications 1966: 0 publications 1967: 4 publications 1968: 1 publication 1969: 5 publications 1970: 8 publications 1971: 10 publications 1972: 3 publications 1973: 5 publications 1974: 7 publications 1975: 8 publications 1976: 1 publication 1977: 2 publications 1978: 11 publications 1979: 11 publications 1980: 11 publications 1981: 11 publications 1982: 5 publications 1983: 8 publications 1984: 13 publications 1985: 16 publications 1986: 17 publications 1987: 21 publications 1988: 12 publications 1989: 18 publications 1990: 13 publications 1991: 16 publications 1992: 21 publications 1993: 11 publications 1994: 17 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 13 publications 1997: 8 publications 1998: 11 publications 1999: 11 publications 2000: 12 publications 2001: 8 publications 2002: 17 publications 2003: 15 publications 2004: 14 publications 2005: 16 publications 2006: 12 publications 2007: 24 publications 2008: 14 publications 2009: 17 publications 2010: 18 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 21 publications 2013: 18 publications 2014: 24 publications 2015: 30 publications 2016: 44 publications 2017: 27 publications 2018: 26 publications 2019: 35 publications 2020: 29 publications 2021: 26 publications 2022: 23 publications 2023: 21 publications 2024: 18 publications 2025: 12 publications
1959 2025

876 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Harvey J. Cohen: publications per year, 1959 to 2025
Year Publications
1959 1
1960 5
1961 2
1962 1
1963 0
1964 1
1965 0
1966 0
1967 4
1968 1
1969 5
1970 8
1971 10
1972 3
1973 5
1974 7
1975 8
1976 1
1977 2
1978 11
1979 11
1980 11
1981 11
1982 5
1983 8
1984 13
1985 16
1986 17
1987 21
1988 12
1989 18
1990 13
1991 16
1992 21
1993 11
1994 17
1995 4
1996 13
1997 8
1998 11
1999 11
2000 12
2001 8
2002 17
2003 15
2004 14
2005 16
2006 12
2007 24
2008 14
2009 17
2010 18
2011 12
2012 21
2013 18
2014 24
2015 30
2016 44
2017 27
2018 26
2019 35
2020 29
2021 26
2022 23
2023 21
2024 18
2025 12
Total 876
Download as CSV

Harvey J. Cohen publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Harvey J. Cohen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 801–820 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 812 publications — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204 812
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Harvey J. Cohen D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Harvey J. Cohen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 138–139 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 138 D-Index — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134 138
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • Member of the Association of American Physicians
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians

Overview

Harvey J. Cohen is affiliated with Duke University in the United States and has contributed extensively to medical research, particularly in the field of aging and oncology. Their research intersects several important disciplines including pulmonary and respiratory medicine, oncology, geriatrics and gerontology, physiology, and critical care and intensive care medicine.

The main fields of study covered by their work include Medicine, with a focus on the following subfields:

  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Oncology
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology
  • Physiology
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine

Their research topics often address complex issues related to aging and cancer, including:

  • Frailty in Older Adults
  • Cancer-related cognitive impairment studies
  • Cancer survivorship and care
  • Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
  • Glioma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life

Harvey J. Cohen's publication record includes several papers widely cited in these areas. Some of their recent works include:

  • Older adult participation in cancer clinical trials: A systematic review of barriers and interventions, 2020, published in CA A Cancer Journal for Clinicians
  • NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Older Adult Oncology, Version 1.2021, 2021, Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network
  • Development and Validation of a Risk Tool for Predicting Severe Toxicity in Older Adults Receiving Chemotherapy for Early-Stage Breast Cancer, 2021, Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • Loneliness and mental health during the COVID-19 pandemic in older breast cancer survivors and noncancer controls, 2021, Cancer
  • Deficit Accumulation Frailty Trajectories of Older Breast Cancer Survivors and Non-Cancer Controls: The Thinking and Living With Cancer Study, 2021, JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute

Their research has been published frequently in venues such as:

  • UNC Libraries
  • Journal of Geriatric Oncology
  • Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
  • Cancer Research

Harvey J. Cohen has collaborated extensively with other researchers in the field. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Jeanne S. Mandelblatt
  • Tim A. Ahles
  • Andrew J. Saykin
  • Judith Carroll
  • Brent J. Small

Their contributions to medical science have been recognized by their membership in the Association of American Physicians.

Best Publications

  • Associations of elevated interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein levels with mortality in the elderly

    Tamara B Harris;Luigi Ferrucci;Russell P Tracy;M.Chiara Corti

  • A method for assessing drug therapy appropriateness

    Joseph T. Hanlon;Kenneth Edwin Schmader;Gregory P. Samsa;Gregory P. Samsa;Morris Weinberger

  • Use of comprehensive geriatric assessment in older cancer patients: recommendations from the task force on CGA of the International Society of Geriatric Oncology (SIOG).

    Martine Extermann;Matti Aapro;Roberto Bernabei;Harvey Jay Cohen

  • Practical assessment and management of vulnerabilities in older patients receiving chemotherapy: Asco guideline for geriatric oncology

    Supriya G. Mohile;William Dale;Mark R. Somerfield;Mara A. Schonberg

  • Improved outcome for children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: results of Dana-Farber Consortium Protocol 91-01.

    Lewis B. Silverman;Richard D. Gelber;Virginia Kimball Dalton;Barbara L. Asselin

  • Quantification of biological aging in young adults.

    Daniel W. Belsky;Avshalom Caspi;Renate Houts;Harvey J. Cohen

  • Religious coping and depression among elderly, hospitalized medically ill men.

    Harold G. Koenig;Harvey J. Cohen;Dan G. Blazer;Carl Pieper

  • Serum IL-6 level and the development of disability in older persons.

    Luigi Ferrucci;Tamara B. Harris;Jack M. Guralnik;Russell P. Tracy

  • Respiratory syncytial viral infection in children with compromised immune function.

    Caroline Breese Hall;Keith R. Powell;Noni E. MacDonald;Christine L. Gala

  • Cytokines and cognition--the case for a head-to-toe inflammatory paradigm.

    Craig J. Wilson;Caleb E. Finch;Harvey J. Cohen;Harvey J. Cohen

  • A randomized, controlled trial of a clinical pharmacist intervention to improve inappropriate prescribing in elderly outpatients with polypharmacy

    Joseph T. Hanlon;Morris Weinberger;Morris Weinberger;Gregory P. Samsa;Gregory P. Samsa;Kenneth E. Schmader;Kenneth E. Schmader

  • A Controlled Trial of Inpatient and Outpatient Geriatric Evaluation and Management

    Harvey Jay Cohen;John R. Feussner;Morris Weinberger;Molly Carnes

  • Randomized study of cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine versus etoposide and cisplatin versus alternation of these two regimens in extensive small-cell lung cancer: a phase III trial of the Southeastern Cancer Study Group

    B J Roth;D H Johnson;L H Einhorn;L P Schacter

  • Developing a Cancer-Specific Geriatric Assessment: A Feasibility Study

    Arti Hurria;Supriya Gupta;Marjorie Zauderer;Enid L. Zuckerman

  • Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Older Women with Early-Stage Breast Cancer

    Hyman B. Muss;Hyman B. Muss;Donald A. Berry;Constance T. Cirrincione;Maria Theodoulou

  • The mode of delivery and the risk of vertical transmission of human immunodeficiency virus type 1--a meta-analysis of 15 prospective cohort studies.

    W. Andiman;M. Boucher;D. Burns;Y. Bryson

  • Barriers to Clinical Trial Participation by Older Women With Breast Cancer

    M. Margaret Kemeny;Bercedis L. Peterson;Alice B. Kornblith;Hyman B. Muss

  • Superoxide generation by digitonin-stimulated guinea pig granulocytes. A basis for a continuous assay for monitoring superoxide production and for the study of the activation of the generating system.

    H J Cohen;M E Chovaniec

  • Family perspectives on the quality of pediatric palliative care.

    Nancy Contro;Judith Larson;Sarah Scofield;Barbara Sourkes

  • Effects of home-based diet and exercise on functional outcomes among older, overweight long-term cancer survivors: RENEW: a randomized controlled trial.

    Miriam C. Morey;Denise C. Snyder;Richard Sloane;Harvey Jay Cohen

Frequent Co-Authors

Arti Hurria
Arti Hurria City Of Hope National Medical Center
Carl F. Pieper
Carl F. Pieper Duke University
Harold G. Koenig
Harold G. Koenig Duke University
Dan G. Blazer
Dan G. Blazer Duke University
Wendy Demark-Wahnefried
Wendy Demark-Wahnefried University of Alabama at Birmingham
Kenneth E. Schmader
Kenneth E. Schmader Duke University
Stephen E. Sallan
Stephen E. Sallan Harvard University
Supriya G. Mohile
Supriya G. Mohile University of Rochester Medical Center
Jeanne S. Mandelblatt
Jeanne S. Mandelblatt Georgetown University
Clifford A. Hudis
Clifford A. Hudis Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in Medicine in the USA often opens the door to a variety of related fields and flexible educational options. For those interested in healthcare leadership, consider cahme accredited online healthcare administration programs, which focus on management skills without slowing down your career progress.

Registered nurses looking to advance may benefit from an rn to bsn without clinicals program. These online pathways are designed for working professionals ready to move up without the extra burden of in-person clinical requirements.

For advanced practice and leadership in nursing, many look to doctoral programs. Options like the shortest dnp programs offer accelerated learning, helping you reach the highest nursing credentials faster.

If cost is a concern, there are also affordable dnp programs that make advanced education more accessible. Exploring these alternatives can help you find the right fit for your career goals, time constraints, and budget.

Best Scientists Citing Harvey J. Cohen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles