World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Kenneth E. Schmader

Kenneth E. Schmader

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
95
Citations
45000
World Ranking
9898
National Ranking
5093

Kenneth E. Schmader publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kenneth E. Schmader sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 305 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Kenneth E. Schmader D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kenneth E. Schmader sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 95 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Kenneth E. Schmader is affiliated with Duke University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Medicine, with a focus on several subfields including Epidemiology, Geriatrics and Gerontology, Infectious Diseases, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, and Rheumatology.

Their recent publications highlight a variety of topics and venues. Notable papers include:

  • The Urinary Microbiome in Postmenopausal Women with Recurrent Urinary Tract Infections, 2021, published in The Journal of Urology
  • Recombinant Zoster Vaccine Is Efficacious and Safe in Frail Individuals, 2020, published in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
  • Pragmatic evaluation of events and benefits of lipid lowering in older adults (PREVENTABLE): Trial design and rationale, 2023, published in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
  • Comparison of bivalent and monovalent SARS-CoV-2 variant vaccines: the phase 2 randomized open-label COVAIL trial, 2023, published in Nature Medicine
  • Vaccine-induced ICOS+CD38+ circulating Tfh are sensitive biosensors of age-related changes in inflammatory pathways, 2021, published in Cell Reports Medicine

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Schmader include:

  • George A. Kuchel
  • Shelly L. Gray
  • Joseph G. Ouslander
  • Boca Raton
  • Ellen F. Binder

Schmader often publishes in the following venues:

  • Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
  • UNC Libraries
  • Open Forum Infectious Diseases
  • Clinical Infectious Diseases
  • JAMA Network Open

Their research topics cover a broad range of subjects, including:

  • Urinary Tract Infections Management
  • Influenza Virus Research Studies
  • Pelvic floor disorders treatments
  • Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
  • SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Herpesvirus Infections and Treatments
  • Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy

Kenneth E. Schmader's body of work reflects a focus on infections and vaccine-related studies, as well as geriatric health and epidemiology. Their research incorporates clinical trials, microbiome investigations, and vaccine efficacy assessments, contributing to applied medical knowledge in both infectious diseases and aging populations.

Best Publications

  • Interpreting the Clinical Importance of Treatment Outcomes in Chronic Pain Clinical Trials: IMMPACT Recommendations

    Robert H. Dworkin;Dennis C. Turk;Kathleen W. Wyrwich;Dorcas Beaton

  • A vaccine to prevent herpes zoster and postherpetic neuralgia in older adults.

    M. N. Oxman;M. N. Oxman;M. J. Levin;G. R. Johnson;K. E. Schmader

  • Protective effect of apolipoprotein E type 2 allele for late onset Alzheimer disease.

    Corder Eh;Saunders Am;Risch Nj;Strittmatter Wj

  • Advances in Neuropathic Pain: Diagnosis, Mechanisms, and Treatment Recommendations

    Robert H. Dworkin;Miroslav Backonja;Michael C. Rowbotham;Robert R. Allen

  • Recommendations for the Pharmacological Management of Neuropathic Pain: An Overview and Literature Update

    Robert H. Dworkin;Alec B. O'Connor;Joseph Audette;Ralf Baron

  • Appropriate prescribing in elderly people: how well can it be measured and optimised?

    Anne Spinewine;Kenneth E Schmader;Nick Barber;Carmel Hughes

  • A method for assessing drug therapy appropriateness

    Joseph T. Hanlon;Kenneth Edwin Schmader;Gregory P. Samsa;Gregory P. Samsa;Morris Weinberger

  • Recommendations for the management of herpes zoster.

    Robert H. Dworkin;Robert W. Johnson;Judith Breuer;John W. Gnann;John W. Gnann

  • Chronic Wound Repair and Healing in Older Adults: Current Status and Future Research

    Lisa Gould Md;Peter Abadir;Harold Brem;Harold Brem;Marissa Carter

  • A randomized, controlled trial of a clinical pharmacist intervention to improve inappropriate prescribing in elderly outpatients with polypharmacy

    Joseph T. Hanlon;Morris Weinberger;Morris Weinberger;Gregory P. Samsa;Gregory P. Samsa;Kenneth E. Schmader;Kenneth E. Schmader

  • Epidemiology and impact on quality of life of postherpetic neuralgia and painful diabetic neuropathy.

    Kenneth E Schmader

  • An interdisciplinary expert consensus statement on assessment of pain in older persons

    Thomas Hadjistavropoulos;Keela Herr;Dennis C. Turk;Perry G. Fine

  • Workshop on HIV Infection and Aging: What Is Known and Future Research Directions

    Rita B. Effros;Courtney V. Fletcher;Kelly Gebo;Jeffrey B. Halter

  • Adverse Drug Events In High Risk Older Outpatients

    Joseph T. Hanlon;Kenneth E. Schmader;Michael J. Koronkowski;Morris Weinberger

  • Apolipoprotein E ∈4 allele distributions in late-onset Alzheimer's disease and in other amyloid-forming diseases

    A. M. Saunders;A. D. Roses;M. A. Pericak-Vance;K. C. Dole

  • Suboptimal Prescribing in Older Inpatients and Outpatients

    Joseph T. Hanlon;Kenneth E. Schmader;Kenneth E. Schmader;Christine M. Ruby;Morris Weinberger

  • Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Herpes Zoster Vaccine in Persons Aged 50–59 Years

    Kenneth E. Schmader;Myron J. Levin;John W. Gnann;John W. Gnann;Shelly A. McNeil

  • A summated score for the medication appropriateness index: development and assessment of clinimetric properties including content validity

    Gregory P. Samsa;Joseph T. Hanlon;Kenneth E. Schmader;Kenneth E. Schmader;Morris Weinberger;Morris Weinberger

  • The Association of Weight Change in Alzheimer's Disease with Severity of Disease and Mortality: A Longitudinal Analysis

    Heidi White;Carl Pieper;Ken Schmader

  • Advances in neuropathic pain: Diagnosis, mechanisms, and treatment recommendations. Editorial

    Robert H. Dworkin;Miroslav Backonja;Michael C. Rowbotham;Robert R. Allen

Frequent Co-Authors

Joseph T. Hanlon
Joseph T. Hanlon University of Pittsburgh
Morris Weinberger
Morris Weinberger University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Myron J. Levin
Myron J. Levin University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
Carl F. Pieper
Carl F. Pieper Duke University
Harvey J. Cohen
Harvey J. Cohen Duke University
Michael N. Oxman
Michael N. Oxman University of California, San Diego
Gerda G. Fillenbaum
Gerda G. Fillenbaum Duke University
Gregory P. Samsa
Gregory P. Samsa Duke University
Robert H. Dworkin
Robert H. Dworkin University of Rochester Medical Center
Eugene Z. Oddone
Eugene Z. Oddone Duke University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Interested in the medical field but not sure if becoming a doctor is right for you? There are many rewarding online degrees and alternative pathways in healthcare, each with unique roles and career prospects.

For those who prefer working with data and healthcare technology, a health information management degree online can open doors to positions in medical records management, data analysis, and healthcare privacy compliance. This option is ideal for detail-oriented individuals who want to improve patient care behind the scenes.

If you’re seeking a specialized credential that can be earned relatively quickly, consider exploring the cheapest medical billing and coding online courses. Medical billing and coding professionals play a vital role in ensuring healthcare providers are properly reimbursed and that patient records are accurately maintained.

Those passionate about direct patient care may pursue the most affordable nurse practitioner programs or affordable online nursing programs. Both options allow you to make a real difference in patient lives, with flexible learning to fit your schedule.

Best Scientists Citing Kenneth E. Schmader

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles