World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
36
Citations
5640
World Ranking
9499
National Ranking
5035

Merrill Hiscock publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Merrill Hiscock sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 120 publications — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Merrill Hiscock D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Merrill Hiscock sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Merrill Hiscock is affiliated with the University of Houston in the United States. Their career is marked by activity within this academic institution, contributing to the body of knowledge associated with their research area.

Although detailed information regarding recent papers, frequent co-authors, publication venues, and book publications is not available, Hiscock's professional association with a recognized university situates them within an established academic environment.

There are no listed main fields of study, subfields, or specific topics related to their research work. This absence of detail limits the ability to outline particular scientific domains or thematic focuses linked to their scholarly output.

Similarly, there is no data regarding awards or distinctions that might frame notable achievements or recognitions within the scientific community.

This profile, while limited in specific identifiers such as publications or research areas, presents an overview of Merrill Hiscock's academic standing through affiliation and the general framework of their scientific engagement.

Best Publications

  • Refining the forced-choice method for the detection of malingering

    Merrill Hiscock;Cheryl K. Hiscock

  • The Flynn Effect: A Meta-analysis

    Lisa H. Trahan;Karla K. Stuebing;Jack M. Fletcher;Merrill Hiscock

  • Attention Deficits in Children Exposed to Alcohol Prenatally

    J. L. Nanson;M. Hiscock

  • Does Cerebral Dominance Develop

    Marcel Kinsbourne;Merrill Hiscock

  • Executive functions in children with frontal and temporal lobe epilepsy.

    Kathleen Culhane-Shelburne;Lynn Chapieski;Merrill Hiscock;Daniel Glaze

  • Is there a sex difference in human laterality? II. An exhaustive survey of visual laterality studies from six neuropsychology journals

    Merrill Hiscock;Marlyne Israelian;Roxanne Inch;Carolyn Jacek

  • Attention and the right-ear advantage: What is the connection?

    Merrill Hiscock;Marcel Kinsbourne

  • Association of low serum anticholinergic levels and cognitive impairment in elderly presurgical patients.

    P S Miller;J S Richardson;C A Jyu;J S Lemay

  • Asymmetries of selective listening and attention switching in children.

    Merrill Hiscock;Marcel Kinsbourne

  • Age-related differences in concurrent-task performance of normal adults: evidence for a decline in processing resources.

    Margaret Crossley;Merrill Hiscock

  • Attention processes in children with shunted hydrocephalus versus attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder.

    Vickie R. Brewer;Jack M. Fletcher;Merrill Hiscock;Kevin C. Davidson

  • Imagery assessment through self-report: what do imagery questionnaires measure?

    Merrill Hiscock

  • Ontogeny of cerebral dominance: Evidence from time-sharing asymmetry in children.

    Merrill Hiscock;Marcel Kinsbourne

  • Selective Listening Asymmetry in Preschool Children.

    Merrill Hiscock;Marcel Kinsbourne

  • Visual imagery and dream recall

    Merrill Hiscock;David B Cohen

  • Asymmetry of verbal-manual time sharing in children: A follow-up study

    Merrill Hiscock;Marcel Kinsbourne

  • Is there a sex difference in human laterality? I. an exhaustive survey of auditory laterality studies from six neuropsychology journals

    Unknown

  • Detection of feigned cognitive impairment: The two-alternative forced-choice method compared with selected conventional tests

    Cheryl K. Hiscock;Janet Dry Branham;Merrill Hiscock

  • Allocation of attention in dichotic listening: differential effects on the detection and localization of signals.

    Merrill Hiscock;Roxanne Inch;Marcel Kinsbourne

  • Learning Disability Subtypes in Children with Neurofibromatosis

    Vickie R. Brewer;Bartlett D. Moore;Merrill Hiscock

  • The Flynn effect and its relevance to neuropsychology

    Merrill Hiscock

  • The effect of asymmetrically focused attention upon subsequent ear differences in dichotic listening.

    Merrill Hiscock;Catherine Stewart

Frequent Co-Authors

Christina A. Meyers
Christina A. Meyers The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Barbara R. Foorman
Barbara R. Foorman Florida State University
Stephen C. P. Wong
Stephen C. P. Wong University of Saskatchewan
Jack M. Fletcher
Jack M. Fletcher University of Houston
Bruno G. Breitmeyer
Bruno G. Breitmeyer University of Houston
Paul R. Swank
Paul R. Swank The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Karla K. Stuebing
Karla K. Stuebing University of Houston
Esther Strauss
Esther Strauss University of Victoria
James M. Swanson
James M. Swanson University of California, Irvine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens doors to a wide range of professional opportunities, especially in social work and mental health fields. Many students interested in helping others pursue related online degrees, such as social work, counseling, or human services. These programs are flexible and can meet diverse educational backgrounds and career objectives.

It’s important to note that social worker requirements vary greatly across states. For example, the Hawaii minimum degree requirement for social workers typically includes at least a bachelor’s degree in social work (BSW). Meanwhile, social worker education requirements in Idaho also call for a BSW or a closely related field.

In states like Illinois, the social worker education requirements in Illinois usually require a Master of Social Work (MSW) for advanced roles. Similarly, the Indiana minimum degree requirement for social workers may depend on the license you seek, but higher positions typically mandate a graduate degree.

Understanding each state’s requirements can help you choose the best online degree program and set a clear path for your psychology-related career.

Best Scientists Citing Merrill Hiscock

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles