World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
55
Citations
16783
World Ranking
4326
National Ranking
2411

Barbara R. Foorman publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Barbara R. Foorman sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 148 publications — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Barbara R. Foorman D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Barbara R. Foorman sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Barbara R. Foorman is affiliated with Florida State University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of psychology and mathematics, with a particular focus on developmental and educational psychology as well as statistics and probability.

The main topics of their work include:

  • Reading and Literacy Development
  • Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Youth Development and Social Support
  • Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Hearing Impairment and Communication

Barbara R. Foorman has frequently published in the following venues:

  • Gothic.net
  • Reading Research Quarterly
  • Learning Disability Quarterly
  • Reading and Writing
  • Education and Treatment of Children

Recent papers include:

  • "Persistence and Fade-Out of Educational-Intervention Effects: Mechanisms and Potential Solutions," 2020, Gothic.net
  • "How the Science of Reading Informs 21st-Century Education," 2020, Reading Research Quarterly
  • "Early Detection of Dyslexia Risk: Development of Brief, Teacher-Administered Screens," 2020, Learning Disability Quarterly
  • "How do latent decoding and language predict latent reading comprehension: across two years in grades 5, 7, and 9?," 2020, Reading and Writing
  • "Implementing Evidence-Based Reading Practices in K-3 Classrooms," 2020, Education and Treatment of Children

Frequent coauthors include:

  • Jack Μ. Fletcher
  • David J. Francis
  • Yaacov Petscher
  • Christopher Schatschneider
  • Joshua I. Breier

Best Publications

  • The Role of Instruction in Learning To Read: Preventing Reading Failure in At-Risk Children.

    Barbara R. Foorman;David J. Francis;Jack M. Fletcher;Christopher Schatschneider

  • How Psychological Science Informs the Teaching of Reading

    Keith Rayner;Barbara R. Foorman;Charles A. Perfetti;David Pesetsky

  • Kindergarten Prediction of Reading Skills: A Longitudinal Comparative Analysis

    Christopher Schatschneider;Jack M. Fletcher;David J. Francis;Coleen D. Carlson

  • Critical Elements of Classroom and Small-Group Instruction Promote Reading Success in All Children.

    Barbara R. Foorman;Joseph Torgesen

  • Dyslexia-specific brain activation profile becomes normal following successful remedial training

    P. G. Simos;J. M. Fletcher;E. Bergman;Joshua I Breier

  • Measuring Teachers' Content Knowledge of Language and Reading.

    Louisa C. Moats;Barbara R. Foorman

  • How Letter-Sound Instruction Mediates Progress in First-Grade Reading and Spelling

    Barbara R. Foorman;David J. Francis;Diana M. Novy;Dov Liberman

  • Relationship of Rapid Automatized Naming and Phonological Awareness in Early Reading Development Implications for the Double-Deficit Hypothesis

    Christopher Schatschneider;Coleen D. Carlson;David J. Francis;Barbara R. Foorman

  • Intelligent testing and the discrepancy model for children with learning disabilities.

    Jack M. Fletcher;David J. Francis;Sally E. Shaywitz;G. Reid Lyon

  • The case for early reading intervention.

    Barbara R. Foorman;David J. Francis;Sally E. Shaywitz;Bennett A. Shaywitz

  • The dimensionality of phonological awareness : An application of item response theory

    Christopher Schatschneider;David J. Francis;Barbara R. Foorman;Jack M. Fletcher

  • Modeling the development of written language

    Richard K. Wagner;Cynthia S. Puranik;Barbara Foorman;Elizabeth Foster

  • Brain Mechanisms for Reading Words and Pseudowords: an Integrated Approach

    Panagiotis G. Simos;Joshua I. Breier;Jack M. Fletcher;Barbara R. Foorman

  • The impact of instructional practices in Grades 1 and 2 on reading and spelling achievement in high poverty schools

    Barbara R. Foorman;Christopher Schatschneider;Michelle N. Eakin;Jack M. Fletcher

  • Conditions for Sustaining Research-Based Practices in Early Reading Instruction:

    Barbara R. Foorman;Louisa C. Moats

  • Literacy as a Unidimensional Multilevel Construct: Validation, Sources of Influence, and Implications in a Longitudinal Study in Grades 1 to 4

    Paras D. Mehta;Barbara R. Foorman;Lee Branum-Martin;W. Patrick Taylor

  • Assessment of Reading and Learning Disabilities A Research-Based Intervention-Oriented Approach

    Jack M Fletcher;Jack M Fletcher;Jack M Fletcher;Barbara R Foorman;Barbara R Foorman;Barbara R Foorman;Amy Boudousquie;Amy Boudousquie;Amy Boudousquie;Marcia A Barnes;Marcia A Barnes;Marcia A Barnes

  • Early Interventions for Children with Reading Disabilities.

    Barbara R. Foorman;David J. Francis;Debbie Winikates;Paras Mehta

  • Does Growth Rate in Oral Reading Fluency Matter in Predicting Reading Comprehension Achievement

    Young-Suk Kim;Yaacov Petscher;Christopher Schatschneider;Barbara R. Foorman

  • Brain activation profiles in dyslexic children during non-word reading: a magnetic source imaging study.

    Panagiotis G Simos;Joshua I Breier;Jack M Fletcher;Barbara R Foorman

  • Language and Cognition English- and Spanish-Speaking Children's Performance on Perceptual and Communication Tasks

    Barbara R. Foorman;Beatrlz Arias-Godinez;Juanita Y. Gonzalez

Frequent Co-Authors

David J. Francis
David J. Francis University of Houston
Yaacov Petscher
Yaacov Petscher Florida State University
Christopher Schatschneider
Christopher Schatschneider Florida State University
Joshua I. Breier
Joshua I. Breier The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Jack M. Fletcher
Jack M. Fletcher University of Houston
Richard K. Wagner
Richard K. Wagner Florida State University
Panagiotis G. Simos
Panagiotis G. Simos University of Crete
Sally E. Shaywitz
Sally E. Shaywitz Yale University
Stephanie Al Otaiba
Stephanie Al Otaiba Southern Methodist University
Charles A. Perfetti
Charles A. Perfetti University of Pittsburgh

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees opens doors to diverse career pathways, including clinical psychology, counseling, human resources, and research roles. Many universities across the U.S. now offer flexible online programs that are both reputable and academically rigorous, making it easier for students to balance their studies with work or personal commitments.

When choosing a program, it’s important to consider factors like faculty expertise, curriculum, and regional strengths. For example, the best psychology program rankings in Newark spotlight top institutions in urban, diverse environments, while the top psychology programs in New Hampshire showcase colleges known for personalized learning.

Regional preferences can also guide your choices. The best psychology program rankings in Orange offer insights into West Coast opportunities, while the best psychology degree programs ranking in Orlando highlight strong options in Central Florida. Each program may provide unique online or hybrid options, connecting you with experienced mentors and strong alumni networks, no matter your location.

Best Scientists Citing Barbara R. Foorman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles