World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
94
Citations
32443
World Ranking
815
National Ranking
512

David J. Francis publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David J. Francis sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 230 publications — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

David J. Francis D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David J. Francis sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 94 D-Index — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

David J. Francis is affiliated with the University of Houston in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of psychology, with a focus on developmental and educational psychology, cognitive neuroscience, education, statistics and probability, and clinical psychology.

The main topics that David J. Francis investigates include:

  • Reading and Literacy Development
  • Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
  • Language Development and Disorders
  • Multilingual Education and Policy
  • Second Language Acquisition and Learning
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism

They have contributed frequently to the following publication venues:

  • Chinese/English Journal of Educational Measurement and Evaluation
  • Reading Research Quarterly
  • Annals of Dyslexia
  • Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research
  • Educational Researcher

Recent papers authored by or associated with David J. Francis's research include:

  • Reading Comprehension and Academic Vocabulary: Exploring Relations of Item Features and Reading Proficiency (2021) published in Reading Research Quarterly
  • Early Detection of Dyslexia Risk: Development of Brief, Teacher-Administered Screens (2020) published in Learning Disability Quarterly
  • The reading profiles of late elementary English learners with and without risk for dyslexia (2022) published in Annals of Dyslexia
  • A sparse representation strategy to eliminate pseudo-HFO events from intracranial EEG for seizure onset zone localization (2022) published in Journal of Neural Engineering
  • The Exceptionality of Twice-Exceptionality: Examining Combined Prevalence of Giftedness and Disability Using Multivariate Statistical Simulation (2023) published in Exceptional Children

David J. Francis collaborates regularly with a number of coauthors, including:

  • Coleen D. Carlson
  • Paulina A. Kulesz
  • Jeremy Miciak
  • Jack Μ. Fletcher
  • Nuri F. Ince

Best Publications

  • The Role of Instruction in Learning To Read: Preventing Reading Failure in At-Risk Children.

    Barbara R. Foorman;David J. Francis;Jack M. Fletcher;Christopher Schatschneider

  • Developmental Lag versus Deficit Models of Reading Disability: A Longitudinal, Individual Growth Curves Analysis.

    David J. Francis;Sally E. Shaywitz;Karla K. Stuebing;Bennett A. Shaywitz

  • Kindergarten Prediction of Reading Skills: A Longitudinal Comparative Analysis

    Christopher Schatschneider;Jack M. Fletcher;David J. Francis;Coleen D. Carlson

  • Cognitive profiles of reading disability: Comparisons of discrepancy and low achievement definitions.

    Jack M. Fletcher;Sally E. Shaywitz;Donald P. Shankweiler;Leonard Katz

  • Development of Phonological Awareness

    Jason L. Anthony;David J. Francis

  • Why IQ is not a covariate in cognitive studies of neurodevelopmental disorders.

    Maureen Dennis;David J. Francis;Paul T. Cirino;Russell Schachar

  • Persistence of dyslexia: the Connecticut Longitudinal Study at adolescence.

    Sally E. Shaywitz;Jack M. Fletcher;John M. Holahan;Abigail E. Shneider

  • Subtypes of reading disability: Variability around a phonological core.

    Robin D. Morris;Karla K. Stuebing;Jack M. Fletcher;Sally E. Shaywitz

  • Speed of Processing, Working Memory, and Language Impairment in Children

    Laurence B. Leonard;Susan Ellis Weismer;Carol A. Miller;David J. Francis

  • The effects of theoretically different instruction and student characteristics on the skills of struggling readers

    Patricia G. Mathes;Carolyn A. Denton;Jack M. Fletcher;Jason L. Anthony

  • Psychometric Approaches to the Identification of LD IQ and Achievement Scores Are Not Sufficient

    David J. Francis;Jack M. Fletcher;Karla K. Stuebing;G. Reid Lyon

  • Oral Language and Reading in Bilingual Children

    Jon F. Miller;John Heilmann;Ann Nockerts;Aquiles Iglesias

  • How Letter-Sound Instruction Mediates Progress in First-Grade Reading and Spelling

    Barbara R. Foorman;David J. Francis;Diana M. Novy;Dov Liberman

  • An Evaluation of Intensive Intervention for Students with Persistent Reading Difficulties

    Carolyn A. Denton;Jack M. Fletcher;Jason L. Anthony;David J. Francis

  • Response to Intervention for Middle School Students With Reading Difficulties: Effects of a Primary and Secondary Intervention.

    Sharon Vaughn;Paul T. Cirino;Jeanne Wanzek;Jade Wexler

  • Analysis of change: modeling individual growth.

    David J. Francis;Jack M. Fletcher;Karla K. Stuebing;Kevin C. Davidson

  • Relationship of Rapid Automatized Naming and Phonological Awareness in Early Reading Development Implications for the Double-Deficit Hypothesis

    Christopher Schatschneider;Coleen D. Carlson;David J. Francis;Barbara R. Foorman

  • Intelligent testing and the discrepancy model for children with learning disabilities.

    Jack M. Fletcher;David J. Francis;Sally E. Shaywitz;G. Reid Lyon

  • Longitudinal neuropsychological outcome in infants and preschoolers with traumatic brain injury

    Linda Ewing-Cobbs;Jack M. Fletcher;Harvey S. Levin;David J. Francis

  • The foundations of literacy: Learning the sounds of letters.

    Rebecca Treiman;Ruth Tincoff;Kira Rodriguez;Angeliki Mouzaki

  • An introduction to structural equation models

    David J. Francis

Frequent Co-Authors

Jack M. Fletcher
Jack M. Fletcher University of Houston
Barbara R. Foorman
Barbara R. Foorman Florida State University
Sharon Vaughn
Sharon Vaughn The University of Texas at Austin
Karla K. Stuebing
Karla K. Stuebing University of Houston
Carolyn A. Denton
Carolyn A. Denton The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Paul T. Cirino
Paul T. Cirino University of Houston
Sally E. Shaywitz
Sally E. Shaywitz Yale University
Bennett A. Shaywitz
Bennett A. Shaywitz Yale University
Christopher Schatschneider
Christopher Schatschneider Florida State University
Marcia A. Barnes
Marcia A. Barnes Vanderbilt University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens doors to a range of rewarding online degree programs and professional pathways. Many students are drawn to careers in counseling, where demand is growing rapidly. A common pathway is becoming a substance abuse counselor, a role that can often be pursued with a bachelor’s or master’s degree in psychology—sometimes paired with state-specific certification.

Certification and training requirements vary depending on your location. For example, those interested in working in Florida can explore St. Petersburg substance abuse counselor certification requirements or learn about how to become a substance abuse counselor in Tampa. Outside of Florida, different processes apply. In California, you can check out the Stockton substance abuse counselor certification requirements. If you’re considering Ohio, review the steps for becoming a substance abuse counselor in Toledo.

Online degrees make it easier than ever to access accredited programs and start building your career, no matter your location. With the right education and certification, psychology graduates can help individuals overcome substance abuse and make a real impact in their communities.

Best Scientists Citing David J. Francis

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles