World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
117
Citations
49623
World Ranking
295
National Ranking
186

Douglas Fuchs publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Douglas Fuchs sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 351 publications — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Douglas Fuchs D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Douglas Fuchs sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 117 D-Index — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2014 - Distinguished Contributions to Research in Education Award, American Educational Research Association
  • 2008 - Fellow of the American Educational Research Association
  • 1998 - Palmer O. Johnson Memorial Award, American Educational Research Association

Overview

Douglas Fuchs is affiliated with Vanderbilt University in the United States and is an active researcher in the fields of psychology, social sciences, and mathematics. Their work spans several subfields, with a primary focus on developmental and educational psychology alongside statistics and probability.

The scientist's recent publications address topics related to educational interventions, assessment methods, and disability education. Notable papers include:

  • "Closing the word-problem achievement gap in first grade: Schema-based word-problem intervention with embedded language comprehension instruction." (2020, Journal of Educational Psychology)
  • "Commercially Developed Tests of Reading Comprehension: Gold Standard or Fool's Gold?" (2021, Reading Research Quarterly)
  • "Bringing Data-Based Individualization to Scale: A Call for the Next-Generation Technology of Teacher Supports" (2021, Journal of Learning Disabilities)
  • "Exploring the Truth of Michael Yudin's Claim: The More Time Students With Disabilities Spend in General Classrooms, the Better They Do Academically" (2022, Journal of Disability Policy Studies)
  • "Are Individual Differences in Response to Intervention Influenced by the Methods and Measures Used to Define Response? Implications for Identifying Children With Learning Disabilities" (2020, Journal of Learning Disabilities)

Fuchs frequently collaborates with other researchers including Lynn S. Fuchs, Pamela M. Seethaler, Kristopher J. Preacher, Eunsoo Cho, and Sonya K. Sterba. Collaborative work appears prominently in journals focusing on learning disabilities and educational psychology.

The scientist publishes predominantly in the following venues:

  • Journal of Learning Disabilities
  • Journal of Educational Psychology
  • Exceptional Children
  • Reading Research Quarterly
  • Journal of Disability Policy Studies

The research topics that Douglas Fuchs focuses on can be described as:

  • Reading and Literacy Development
  • Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills
  • Educational and Psychological Assessments
  • Disability Education and Employment
  • Parental Involvement in Education
  • Mathematics Education and Teaching Techniques
  • Educational Strategies and Epistemologies

Over the course of their career, Fuchs has received several awards including the Distinguished Contributions to Research in Education Award from the American Educational Research Association in 2014, was named a Fellow of the same association in 2008, and received the Palmer O. Johnson Memorial Award from AERA in 1998.

Best Publications

  • Introduction to Response to Intervention: What, Why, and How Valid Is It?.

    Douglas Fuchs;Lynn S. Fuchs

  • Oral Reading Fluency as an Indicator of Reading Competence: A Theoretical, Empirical, and Historical Analysis

    Lynn S. Fuchs;Douglas Fuchs;Michelle K. Hosp;Joseph R. Jenkins

  • Responsiveness-to-Intervention: Definitions, Evidence, and Implications for the Learning Disabilities Construct.

    Douglas Fuchs;Devery Mock;Paul L. Morgan;Caresa L. Young

  • Inclusive Schools Movement and the Radicalization of Special Education Reform

    Douglas Fuchs;Lynn S. Fuchs

  • Effects of Systematic Formative Evaluation: A Meta-Analysis:

    Lynn S. Fuchs;Douglas Fuchs

  • Peer-Assisted Learning Strategies: Making Classrooms More Responsive to Diversity:

    Douglas Fuchs;Lynn S. Fuchs;Patricia G. Mathes;Deborah C. Simmons

  • The Prevention, Identification, and Cognitive Determinants of Math Difficulty.

    Lynn S. Fuchs;Donald L. Compton;Douglas Fuchs;Kimberly Paulsen

  • The cognitive correlates of third-grade skill in arithmetic, algorithmic computation, and arithmetic word problems

    Lynn S. Fuchs;Douglas Fuchs;Donald L. Compton;Sarah R. Powell

  • Is There a Bidirectional Relationship between Children's Reading Skills and Reading Motivation?:

    Paul L. Morgan;Douglas Fuchs

  • Formative Evaluation of Academic Progress: How Much Growth Can We Expect?.

    Lynn S. Fuchs;Douglas Fuchs;Carol L. Hamlett;Lynn Walz

  • Using Curriculum‐Based Measurement to Improve Student Achievement: Review of Research

    Pamela M. Stecker;Lynn S. Fuchs;Douglas Fuchs

  • The Validity of Informal Reading Comprehension Measures

    Lynn S. Fuchs;Douglas Fuchs;Linn Maxwell

  • Treatment Validity: A Unifying Concept for Reconceptualizing the Identification of Learning Disabilities.

    Lynn S. Fuchs;Douglas Fuchs

  • The “Blurring” of Special Education in a New Continuum of General Education Placements and Services:

    Douglas Fuchs;Lynn S. Fuchs;Pamela M. Stecker

  • What We Need to Know about Responsiveness to Intervention (and Shouldn't Be Afraid to Ask).

    Douglas Fuchs;Donald D. Deshler

  • Smart RTI: A Next-Generation Approach to Multilevel Prevention

    Douglas Fuchs;Lynn S. Fuchs;Donald L. Compton

  • Characteristics of Children Who Are Unresponsive to Early Literacy Intervention A Review of the Literature

    Stephanie Al Otaiba;Douglas Fuchs

  • A Model for Implementing Responsiveness to Intervention

    Lynn S. Fuchs;Douglas Fuchs

  • Selecting At-Risk Readers in First Grade for Early Intervention: A Two-Year Longitudinal Study of Decision Rules and Procedures

    Donald L. Compton;Douglas Fuchs;Lynn S. Fuchs;Joan D. Bryant

  • Responding to Nonresponders: An Experimental Field Trial of Identification and Intervention Methods:

    Kristen L. McMaster;Douglas Fuchs;Lynn S. Fuchs;Donald L. Compton

Frequent Co-Authors

Lynn S. Fuchs
Lynn S. Fuchs Vanderbilt University
Carol L. Hamlett
Carol L. Hamlett Vanderbilt University
Donald L. Compton
Donald L. Compton Florida State University
Kristen L. McMaster
Kristen L. McMaster University of Minnesota
Paul T. Cirino
Paul T. Cirino University of Houston
Jack M. Fletcher
Jack M. Fletcher University of Houston
Paul L. Morgan
Paul L. Morgan University at Albany, State University of New York
David C. Geary
David C. Geary University of Missouri
Stanley L. Deno
Stanley L. Deno University of Minnesota
Stephanie Al Otaiba
Stephanie Al Otaiba Southern Methodist University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a Psychology degree in the USA can open doors to numerous online degrees and flexible career pathways. Many institutions offer accredited online psychology programs, allowing students to balance their studies with personal and professional commitments.

A popular career option for psychology graduates is mental health counseling. Requirements to become a counselor can vary by location. For example, Tampa mental health counselor education requirements focus on obtaining a relevant master's degree and supervised clinical experience. Similarly, those interested in Ohio should be aware of the Toledo mental health counselor certification requirements, which detail local licensure and exam standards.

If you’re seeking to become a mental health counselor in Tucson, expect unique state-specific processes including background checks and continuing education. For Oklahoma, Tulsa mental health counselor education requirements also emphasize both academics and practical training.

Whether you pursue counseling or another psychology-related field, researching online program accreditation and local licensure conditions is key for a successful career in mental health.

Best Scientists Citing Douglas Fuchs

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles