World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Engineering and Technology 54 3118 2984 17 17 185 17280

Mohamed Al-Rubeai publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mohamed Al-Rubeai between 1986 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mohamed Al-Rubeai published across 36 years, from 1986 to 2021, averaging 7.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 23 publications in 2007. 10 of the 254 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1986 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 23. Peak 23 publications in 2007. 1986: 1 publication 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 4 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 9 publications 1993: 6 publications 1994: 12 publications 1995: 9 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 7 publications 1998: 14 publications 1999: 16 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 13 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 11 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 23 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 2 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 4 publications
1986 2021

254 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mohamed Al-Rubeai: publications per year, 1986 to 2021
Year Publications
1986 1
1987 0
1988 0
1989 2
1990 4
1991 4
1992 9
1993 6
1994 12
1995 9
1996 4
1997 7
1998 14
1999 16
2000 6
2001 4
2002 13
2003 4
2004 11
2005 8
2006 8
2007 23
2008 9
2009 11
2010 9
2011 9
2012 7
2013 9
2014 6
2015 7
2016 7
2017 2
2018 1
2019 2
2020 6
2021 4
Total 254
Download as CSV

Mohamed Al-Rubeai publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mohamed Al-Rubeai sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 804+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 457. Most scientists, 457, have 148–157 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 178–187 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 804+

This scientist: 185 publications — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 20
48–57 35
58–67 96
68–77 135
78–87 190
88–97 259
98–107 283
108–117 369
118–127 341
128–137 386
138–147 372
148–157 457
158–167 415
168–177 407
178–187 421 185
188–197 378
198–207 403
208–217 317
218–227 346
228–237 321
238–247 260
248–257 280
258–267 240
268–277 214
278–287 242
288–297 203
298–307 166
308–317 154
318–327 175
328–337 159
338–347 99
348–357 131
358–367 106
368–377 118
378–387 97
388–397 108
398–407 82
408–417 71
418–427 64
428–437 55
438–447 54
448–457 60
458–467 47
468–477 40
478–487 30
488–497 29
498–507 38
508–517 40
518–527 32
528–537 23
538–547 28
548–557 23
558–567 19
568–577 16
578–587 17
588–597 18
598–607 22
608–617 15
618–627 9
628–637 11
638–647 21
648–657 12
658–667 9
668–677 11
678–687 9
688–697 6
698–707 14
708–717 7
718–727 8
728–737 10
738–747 9
748–757 5
758–767 5
768–777 11
778–787 7
788–797 2
798–803 4
804+ 100
Download as CSV

Mohamed Al-Rubeai D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mohamed Al-Rubeai sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 107+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 426. Most scientists, 426, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 54 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 59
31 114
32 129
33 189
34 200
35 262
36 311
37 312
38 350
39 385
40 348
41 362
42 426
43 380
44 310
45 341
46 301
47 306
48 271
49 246
50 210
51 253
52 213
53 221
54 195 54
55 186
56 170
57 167
58 166
59 144
60 152
61 141
62 138
63 131
64 118
65 114
66 119
67 95
68 87
69 77
70 89
71 69
72 54
73 46
74 55
75 54
76 49
77 53
78 46
79 28
80 39
81 36
82 24
83 26
84 36
85 18
86 25
87 19
88 26
89 27
90 23
91 15
92 12
93 9
94 15
95 10
96 13
97 13
98 9
99 7
100 7
101 8
102 7
103 7
104 9
105 6
106 9
107+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

Mohamed Al-Rubeai is affiliated with University College Dublin in Ireland. Their research primarily falls within the field of Medicine, with a particular focus on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Biomaterials, Molecular Biology, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, and Aerospace Engineering.

The scientist's main research topics include:

  • Plasma Applications and Diagnostics
  • Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
  • Plasma Diagnostics and Applications
  • Plasma and Flow Control in Aerodynamics
  • Ear Surgery and Otitis Media
  • Tracheal and Airway Disorders
  • Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies

Recent publications cover a range of biomedical and biotechnological advances. Notable papers include:

  • "Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition)" (2021) published in Americanae (AECID Library)
  • "Controlling stem cell fate using cold atmospheric plasma" (2020) published in Stem Cell Research & Therapy
  • "Recent advances in the implant-based drug delivery in otorhinolaryngology" (2020) published in Acta Biomaterialia
  • "Cold atmospheric plasma as an interface biotechnology for enhancing surgical implants" (2021) published in Critical Reviews in Biotechnology
  • "Multimodal treatment combining cold atmospheric plasma and acidic fibroblast growth factor for multi-tissue regeneration" (2021) published in The FASEB Journal

Mohamed Al-Rubeai collaborates frequently with several researchers, including:

  • Fei Tan
  • Daniel J. Klionsky
  • Kotb Abdelmohsen
  • Akihisa Abe
  • Hagai Abeliovich

Their works are published across multiple venues such as Americanae (AECID Library), Stem Cell Research & Therapy, Acta Biomaterialia, Critical Reviews in Biotechnology, and The FASEB Journal.

Best Publications

  • Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition)

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Kotb Abdelmohsen;Akihisa Abe;Joynal Abedin

  • Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition)

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Kotb Abdelmohsen;Akihisa Abe;Joynal Abedin

  • Selection methods for high-producing mammalian cell lines.

    Susan M. Browne;Mohamed Al-Rubeai

  • Cell death in bioreactors : a role for apoptosis

    Singh Rp;Al-Rubeai M;Gregory Cd;Emery An

  • Apoptosis in cell culture.

    Mohamed Al-Rubeai;Rabinder P Singh

  • Cell death (apoptosis) in cell culture systems

    Thomas G. Cotter;Mohamed Al-Rubeai

  • Death mechanisms of animal cells in conditions of intensive agitation.

    M. Al-Rubeai;R. P. Singh;M. H. Goldman;A. N. Emery

  • Retroviral vectors for human gene delivery.

    Sally McTaggart;Mohamed Al-Rubeai

  • Uncoupling of cell growth and proliferation results in enhancement of productivity in p21CIP1-arrested CHO cells

    Jing-Xiu Bi;John Shuttleworth;Mohamed Al-Rubeai

  • Influence of bcl-2 on cell death during the cultivation of a Chinese hamster ovary cell line expressing a chimeric antibody.

    B. T. Tey;R. P. Singh;L. Piredda;M. Piacentini

  • Prevention of hybridoma cell death by bcl‐2 during suboptimal culture conditions

    Nicholas H. Simpson;Anne E. Milner;Mohamed Al-Rubeai

  • Cell death in mammalian cell culture: molecular mechanisms and cell line engineering strategies

    Britta Krampe;Mohamed Al-Rubeai

  • Mechanisms and kinetics of monoclonal antibody synthesis and secretion in synchronous and asynchronous hybridoma cell cultures.

    Mohamed Al-Rubeai;A.N. Emery

  • The effects of agitation intensity with and without continuous sparging on the growth and antibody production of hybridoma cells

    S.K.W. Oh;A.W. Nienow;M. Al-Rubeai;A.N. Emery

  • In hybridoma cultures, deprivation of any single amino acid leads to apoptotic death, which is suppressed by the expression of the bcl-2 gene.

    N. H. Simpson;R. P. Singh;A. Perani;C. Goldenzon

  • Estimation of disruption of animal cells by laminar shear stress.

    C. Born;Z. Zhang;M. Al-Rubeai;C. R. Thomas

  • Specific monoclonal antibody productivity and the cell cycle-comparisons of batch, continuous and perfusion cultures.

    Mohamed Al-Rubeai;A. N. Emery;S. Chalder;D. C. Jan

  • Bioreactor systems for the production of biopharmaceuticals from animal cells

    James N. Warnock;Mohamed Al-Rubeai

  • Monitoring pH and dissolved oxygen in mammalian cell culture using optical sensors.

    Mariam Naciri;Darrin Kuystermans;Mohamed Al-Rubeai

  • Improved cell line development by a high throughput affinity capture surface display technique to select for high secretors.

    Paul Holmes;Mohamed Al-Rubeai

  • Relationship between cell size, cell cycle and specific recombinant protein productivity

    David R. Lloyd;Paul Holmes;Lee P. Jackson;A. Nicholas Emery

  • Viral Vectors for Gene Therapy

    James N. Warnock;Mohamed Al‐Rubeai

Frequent Co-Authors

Alvin W. Nienow
Alvin W. Nienow University of Birmingham
Evelina Gatti
Evelina Gatti Aix-Marseille University
Shazib Pervaiz
Shazib Pervaiz National University of Singapore
Francesco Falciani
Francesco Falciani University of Liverpool
Leonidas C. Platanias
Leonidas C. Platanias Northwestern University
Hsing Jien Kung
Hsing Jien Kung Taipei Medical University
Maurizio Molinari
Maurizio Molinari Universita della Svizzera Italiana
Yee-Joo Tan
Yee-Joo Tan National University of Singapore
Beth Levine
Beth Levine The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Denis P. Dowling
Denis P. Dowling University College Dublin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Engineering and Technology in the USA opens doors to a wide range of online degrees and career pathways. Many students seek flexible, affordable options that allow them to study while continuing work or other commitments.

For those interested in business or management, consider pursuing an online mba aacsb, which provides a solid foundation in leadership and strategic decision-making. If you’re more inclined toward the hospitality sector, an online hospitality degree can lead to exciting roles managing hotels, resorts, or event venues.

Career options are not limited to engineering fields. The legal industry presents opportunities as well, and aba approved paralegal programs online can prepare you for fast-growing roles supporting legal professionals. Similarly, those with an interest in people management may choose one of the cheapest online masters in human resources programs to build or advance a career in HR.

With so many online pathways, you can match your unique interests and goals to the right degree—setting yourself up for success in technology, business, hospitality, law, or human resources.

Best Scientists Citing Mohamed Al-Rubeai

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles