World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
54
Citations
8708
World Ranking
4676
National Ranking
2593

David T. R. Berry publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David T. R. Berry sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 116 publications — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

David T. R. Berry D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David T. R. Berry sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

David T. R. Berry is affiliated with the University of Kentucky in the United States. Their research primarily intersects the fields of Medicine and Neuroscience, with a focused interest in Psychiatry and Mental Health as well as Cognitive Neuroscience.

Their recent scientific contributions include the paper titled Conners' Adult ADHD Rating Scale Infrequency Index Validation and Pilot Comparison of Administration Formats, published in 2020 in the journal Psychological Disorders and Research. This work addresses aspects of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), contributing to the ongoing investigation of behavioral assessments in clinical psychology.

The main topics covered in David T. R. Berry's research are:

  • Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Their research output also reflects collaboration with several frequent co-authors, showing an active engagement in joint scholarly work. These collaborators include:

  • Elizabeth Wallace
  • Jordan P. Harp
  • Brittany D. Walls
  • Frederick A. Schmitt
  • Kullen Balthrop

David T. R. Berry has published predominantly in the journal Psychological Disorders and Research, which aligns with their focus on psychiatry and mental health topics.

Best Publications

  • Detection of malingering on the MMPI: A meta-analysis

    David T.R. Berry;Ruth A. Baer;Monica J. Harris

  • A comparative meta-analysis of Rorschach and MMPI validity.

    Jordan B. Hiller;Robert Rosenthal;Robert F. Bornstein;David T. R. Berry

  • Detection of inadequate effort on neuropsychological testing: a meta-analytic review of selected procedures.

    Chad D Vickery;David T.R Berry;Tina Hanlon Inman;Monica J Harris

  • A review of diagnostic techniques in the differential diagnosis of epileptic and nonepileptic seizures.

    Dona E. Cragar;David T. R. Berry;Toufic A. Fakhoury;Jean E. Cibula

  • MMPI-2 Random Responding Indices: Validation Using a Self-Report Methodology.

    David T. R. Berry;Martha W. Wetter;Ruth A. Baer;Lene Larsen

  • Detection of feigned ADHD in college students.

    Myriam J. Sollman;John D. Ranseen;David T. R. Berry

  • Rey-Osterrieth complex figure: Psychometric characteristics in a geriatric sample

    David T.R. Berry;Rebecca S. Allen;Frederick A. Schmitt

  • Cognition and Depression Following Deep Brain Stimulation of the Subthalamic Nucleus and Globus Pallidus Pars Internus in Parkinson’s Disease: A Meta-Analysis

    Hannah L. Combs;Bradley S. Folley;David T. R. Berry;Suzanne C. Segerstrom

  • What Is Hypopnea, Anyway?

    Neal J. Moser;Barbara A. Phillips;David T.R. Berry;Lynn Harbison

  • Screening for feigned psychiatric symptoms in a forensic sample by using the MMPI-2 and the structured inventory of malingered symptomatology.

    Jason L. Lewis;Andrew M. Simcox;David T. R. Berry

  • Nocturnal hypoxia and neuropsychological variables.

    D. T. R. Berry;W. B. Webb;A. J. Block;R. M. Bauer

  • Detection of underreporting of psychopathology on the MMPI: A meta-analysis

    Ruth A. Baer;Martha W. Wetter;David T.R. Berry

  • Sleep Apnea Syndrome* A Critical Review of the Apnea Index as a Diagnostic Criterion

    David T.R. Berry;Wilse B. Webb;A.Jay Block

  • Sensitivity of MMPI-2 validity scales to random responding and malingering.

    Martha W. Wetter;Ruth A. Baer;David T. R. Berry;Gregory T. Smith

  • Detection of inadequate effort on neuropsychological testing: a meta-analytic update and extension.

    Myriam J. Sollman;David T.R. Berry

  • Use of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale Digit Span subtest for malingering detection: a meta-analytic review.

    Lindsey J Jasinski;David T R Berry;Anni L Shandera;Jessica A Clark

  • Cross-validation of indicators of malingering: a comparison of nine neuropsychological tests, four tests of malingering, and behavioral observations.

    Tina Hanlon Inman;David T.R Berry

  • MMPI-2 profiles of motivated fakers given specific symptom information: A comparison to matched patients.

    Martha W. Wetter;Ruth A. Baer;David T. R. Berry;Lori H. Robison

  • Effects of two types of information on malingering of closed head injury on the MMPI-2: An analog investigation.

    David G. Lamb;David T. R. Berry;Martha W. Wetter;Ruth A. Baer

  • Development and Initial Validation of a New Procedure for Evaluating Adequacy of Effort Given During Neuropsychological Testing: The Letter Memory Test

    Tina Hanlon Inman;Chad D. Vickery;David T. R. Berry;David G. Lamb

Frequent Co-Authors

Frederick A. Schmitt
Frederick A. Schmitt University of Kentucky
Ruth A. Baer
Ruth A. Baer University of Kentucky
Gregory T. Smith
Gregory T. Smith University of Kentucky
Wilse B. Webb
Wilse B. Webb University of Florida
Richard Rogers
Richard Rogers University of North Texas
Rebecca S. Allen
Rebecca S. Allen University of Alabama
Glenn D. Walters
Glenn D. Walters Kutztown University
Fred B. Bryant
Fred B. Bryant Loyola University Chicago
Robert F. Bornstein
Robert F. Bornstein Adelphi University
Jerry J. Sweet
Jerry J. Sweet NorthShore University HealthSystem

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring an online psychology degree can open many doors for your education and career, offering flexibility and access to top programs across the country. Earning a psychology degree online is increasingly popular for students seeking to balance work, life, and study.

When considering your options, looking at regional rankings can help you find the best program to fit your needs. For example, you can compare online psychology degrees in Pennsylvania or explore the best online psychology degree rankings in San Diego for more localized opportunities.

Students in Texas can review the best online psychology program rankings in Texas to find programs that align with their goals. If you’re looking for a nationwide perspective, the best online psychology degree rankings in USA offer a broad overview of top programs across the country.

Graduates from online psychology programs can pursue careers in counseling, human resources, research, marketing, and more. Ultimately, online degrees provide flexibility while helping you develop the critical skills necessary for a wide variety of roles in the expanding field of psychology.

Best Scientists Citing David T. R. Berry

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles