World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 54 4676 4330 2593 2345 116 8708

David T. R. Berry publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by David T. R. Berry between 1980 and 2020, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. David T. R. Berry published across 41 years, from 1980 to 2020, averaging 2.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 7 publications in 1994. 3 of the 118 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1980 to 2020. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 7. Peak 7 publications in 1994. 1980: 1 publication 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 3 publications 1985: 2 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 3 publications 1989: 4 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 6 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 7 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 3 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 1 publication 2013: 3 publications 2014: 1 publication 2015: 3 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 2 publications 2020: 1 publication
1980 2020

118 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
David T. R. Berry: publications per year, 1980 to 2020
Year Publications
1980 1
1981 0
1982 0
1983 1
1984 3
1985 2
1986 2
1987 1
1988 3
1989 4
1990 3
1991 4
1992 6
1993 1
1994 7
1995 4
1996 6
1997 3
1998 3
1999 3
2000 2
2001 4
2002 4
2003 2
2004 2
2005 1
2006 3
2007 4
2008 5
2009 5
2010 5
2011 7
2012 1
2013 3
2014 1
2015 3
2016 2
2017 3
2018 1
2019 2
2020 1
Total 118
Download as CSV

David T. R. Berry publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David T. R. Berry sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 111–120 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 116 publications — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686 116
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

David T. R. Berry D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David T. R. Berry sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 54–55 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408 54
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

David T. R. Berry is affiliated with the University of Kentucky in the United States. Their research primarily intersects the fields of Medicine and Neuroscience, with a focused interest in Psychiatry and Mental Health as well as Cognitive Neuroscience.

Their recent scientific contributions include the paper titled Conners' Adult ADHD Rating Scale Infrequency Index Validation and Pilot Comparison of Administration Formats, published in 2020 in the journal Psychological Disorders and Research. This work addresses aspects of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), contributing to the ongoing investigation of behavioral assessments in clinical psychology.

The main topics covered in David T. R. Berry's research are:

  • Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Their research output also reflects collaboration with several frequent co-authors, showing an active engagement in joint scholarly work. These collaborators include:

  • Elizabeth Wallace
  • Jordan P. Harp
  • Brittany D. Walls
  • Frederick A. Schmitt
  • Kullen Balthrop

David T. R. Berry has published predominantly in the journal Psychological Disorders and Research, which aligns with their focus on psychiatry and mental health topics.

Best Publications

  • Detection of malingering on the MMPI: A meta-analysis

    David T.R. Berry;Ruth A. Baer;Monica J. Harris

  • A comparative meta-analysis of Rorschach and MMPI validity.

    Jordan B. Hiller;Robert Rosenthal;Robert F. Bornstein;David T. R. Berry

  • Detection of inadequate effort on neuropsychological testing: a meta-analytic review of selected procedures.

    Chad D Vickery;David T.R Berry;Tina Hanlon Inman;Monica J Harris

  • A review of diagnostic techniques in the differential diagnosis of epileptic and nonepileptic seizures.

    Dona E. Cragar;David T. R. Berry;Toufic A. Fakhoury;Jean E. Cibula

  • MMPI-2 Random Responding Indices: Validation Using a Self-Report Methodology.

    David T. R. Berry;Martha W. Wetter;Ruth A. Baer;Lene Larsen

  • Detection of feigned ADHD in college students.

    Myriam J. Sollman;John D. Ranseen;David T. R. Berry

  • Rey-Osterrieth complex figure: Psychometric characteristics in a geriatric sample

    David T.R. Berry;Rebecca S. Allen;Frederick A. Schmitt

  • Cognition and Depression Following Deep Brain Stimulation of the Subthalamic Nucleus and Globus Pallidus Pars Internus in Parkinson’s Disease: A Meta-Analysis

    Hannah L. Combs;Bradley S. Folley;David T. R. Berry;Suzanne C. Segerstrom

  • What Is Hypopnea, Anyway?

    Neal J. Moser;Barbara A. Phillips;David T.R. Berry;Lynn Harbison

  • Screening for feigned psychiatric symptoms in a forensic sample by using the MMPI-2 and the structured inventory of malingered symptomatology.

    Jason L. Lewis;Andrew M. Simcox;David T. R. Berry

  • Nocturnal hypoxia and neuropsychological variables.

    D. T. R. Berry;W. B. Webb;A. J. Block;R. M. Bauer

  • Detection of underreporting of psychopathology on the MMPI: A meta-analysis

    Ruth A. Baer;Martha W. Wetter;David T.R. Berry

  • Sleep Apnea Syndrome* A Critical Review of the Apnea Index as a Diagnostic Criterion

    David T.R. Berry;Wilse B. Webb;A.Jay Block

  • Sensitivity of MMPI-2 validity scales to random responding and malingering.

    Martha W. Wetter;Ruth A. Baer;David T. R. Berry;Gregory T. Smith

  • Detection of inadequate effort on neuropsychological testing: a meta-analytic update and extension.

    Myriam J. Sollman;David T.R. Berry

  • Use of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale Digit Span subtest for malingering detection: a meta-analytic review.

    Lindsey J Jasinski;David T R Berry;Anni L Shandera;Jessica A Clark

  • Cross-validation of indicators of malingering: a comparison of nine neuropsychological tests, four tests of malingering, and behavioral observations.

    Tina Hanlon Inman;David T.R Berry

  • MMPI-2 profiles of motivated fakers given specific symptom information: A comparison to matched patients.

    Martha W. Wetter;Ruth A. Baer;David T. R. Berry;Lori H. Robison

  • Effects of two types of information on malingering of closed head injury on the MMPI-2: An analog investigation.

    David G. Lamb;David T. R. Berry;Martha W. Wetter;Ruth A. Baer

  • Development and Initial Validation of a New Procedure for Evaluating Adequacy of Effort Given During Neuropsychological Testing: The Letter Memory Test

    Tina Hanlon Inman;Chad D. Vickery;David T. R. Berry;David G. Lamb

Frequent Co-Authors

Frederick A. Schmitt
Frederick A. Schmitt University of Kentucky
Ruth A. Baer
Ruth A. Baer University of Kentucky
Gregory T. Smith
Gregory T. Smith University of Kentucky
Wilse B. Webb
Wilse B. Webb University of Florida
Richard Rogers
Richard Rogers University of North Texas
Rebecca S. Allen
Rebecca S. Allen University of Alabama
Glenn D. Walters
Glenn D. Walters Kutztown University
Fred B. Bryant
Fred B. Bryant Loyola University Chicago
Robert F. Bornstein
Robert F. Bornstein Adelphi University
Jerry J. Sweet
Jerry J. Sweet NorthShore University HealthSystem

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring an online psychology degree can open many doors for your education and career, offering flexibility and access to top programs across the country. Earning a psychology degree online is increasingly popular for students seeking to balance work, life, and study.

When considering your options, looking at regional rankings can help you find the best program to fit your needs. For example, you can compare online psychology degrees in Pennsylvania or explore the best online psychology degree rankings in San Diego for more localized opportunities.

Students in Texas can review the best online psychology program rankings in Texas to find programs that align with their goals. If you’re looking for a nationwide perspective, the best online psychology degree rankings in USA offer a broad overview of top programs across the country.

Graduates from online psychology programs can pursue careers in counseling, human resources, research, marketing, and more. Ultimately, online degrees provide flexibility while helping you develop the critical skills necessary for a wide variety of roles in the expanding field of psychology.

Best Scientists Citing David T. R. Berry

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles