World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
79
Citations
43850
World Ranking
1476
National Ranking
882

Gregory T. Smith publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gregory T. Smith sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 227 publications — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Gregory T. Smith D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gregory T. Smith sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 79 D-Index — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Gregory T. Smith is affiliated with the University of Kentucky in the United States and specializes in the field of psychology, with a primary focus on clinical psychology. Their research contributions span various subfields including applied psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, epidemiology, and marketing.

The main topics addressed in their work include eating disorders and behaviors, behavioral health and interventions, mental health research topics, substance abuse treatment and outcomes, personality disorders and psychopathology, as well as consumer behavior related to brand consumption and identification.

Smith has made multiple contributions to several publication venues, notably:

  • Appetite
  • Eating Behaviors
  • Alcohol and Alcoholism
  • Annual Review of Clinical Psychology
  • Journal of Personality

Their recent notable papers comprise:

  • The General Factor of Psychopathology, 2020, Annual Review of Clinical Psychology
  • An examination of negative urgency and other impulsigenic traits in purging disorder, 2020, Eating Behaviors
  • Increases in shame following binge eating among women: Laboratory and longitudinal findings, 2022, Appetite
  • Pathways of personality and learning risk for addictive behaviors: A systematic review of mediational research on the acquired preparedness model, 2022, Journal of Personality
  • The interaction between affective lability and eating expectancies predicts binge eating, 2021, Eating Disorders

Frequent collaborators include Heather A. Davis, Emily Atkinson, Elizabeth N. Riley, Pamela K. Keel, and Sarah J. Peterson. The collaboration with Heather A. Davis is the most frequent.

Best Publications

  • Using Self-Report Assessment Methods to Explore Facets of Mindfulness

    Ruth A. Baer;Gregory T. Smith;Jaclyn Hopkins;Jennifer Krietemeyer

  • Construct Validity of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire in Meditating and Nonmeditating Samples.

    Ruth A. Baer;Gregory T. Smith;Emily Lykins;Daniel Button

  • Assessment of mindfulness by self-report: the Kentucky inventory of mindfulness skills.

    Ruth A. Baer;Gregory T. Smith;Kristin B. Allen

  • Integration of impulsivity and positive mood to predict risky behavior: Development and validation of a measure of positive urgency.

    Melissa A. Cyders;Gregory T. Smith;Nichea S. Spillane;Sarah Fischer

  • Emotion-based dispositions to rash action: positive and negative urgency.

    Melissa A. Cyders;Gregory T. Smith

  • Formulating clinical research hypotheses as structural equation models: a conceptual overview.

    Rick H. Hoyle;Gregory T. Smith

  • On the sins of short-form development.

    Gregory T. Smith;Denis M. McCarthy;Kristen G. Anderson

  • Assessing mindfulness in children and adolescents: development and validation of the Child and Adolescent Mindfulness Measure (CAMM).

    Laurie A. Greco;Ruth A. Baer;Gregory T. Smith

  • Understanding the construct of impulsivity and its relationship to alcohol use disorders.

    Danielle M. Dick;Gregory Smith;Peter Olausson;Suzanne H. Mitchell

  • Construct Validity: Advances in Theory and Methodology

    Milton E. Strauss;Gregory T. Smith

  • Using alcohol expectancies to predict adolescent drinking behavior after one year.

    Bruce A. Christiansen;Gregory T. Smith;Patricia V. Roehling;Mark S. Goldman

  • On the validity and utility of discriminating among impulsivity-like traits.

    Gregory T. Smith;Sarah Fischer;Melissa A. Cyders;Agnes M. Annus

  • Mood-based rash action and its components: Positive and negative urgency

    Melissa A. Cyders;Gregory T. Smith

  • Expectancy for social facilitation from drinking: The divergent paths of high-expectancy and low-expectancy adolescents.

    Gregory T. Smith;Mark S. Goldman;Paul E. Greenbaum;Bruce A. Christiansen

  • The role of personality dispositions to risky behavior in predicting first-year college drinking.

    Melissa A. Cyders;Kate Flory;Sarah Rainer;Gregory T. Smith

  • Alcoholism and memory: broadening the scope of alcohol-expectancy research.

    Mark S. Goldman;Sandra A. Brown;Bruce A. Christiansen;Gregory T. Smith

  • Methodological considerations in the refinement of clinical assessment instruments.

    Gregory T. Smith;Denis M. McCarthy

  • An Exploration of Sexual Victimization and Academic Performance Among College Women

    Carol E. Jordan;Jessica L. Combs;Gregory T. Smith

  • On Construct Validity: Issues of Method and Measurement.

    Gregory T. Smith

  • Another look at impulsivity: a meta-analytic review comparing specific dispositions to rash action in their relationship to bulimic symptoms.

    Solomon Fischer;Gregory T. Smith;Gregory T. Smith;Melissa A. Cyders;Melissa A. Cyders

  • Emergence of alcohol expectancies in childhood: a possible critical period.

    P. G. Miller;G. T. Smith;Mark S. Goldman

Frequent Co-Authors

Melissa A. Cyders
Melissa A. Cyders Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis
Denis M. McCarthy
Denis M. McCarthy University of Missouri
Mark S. Goldman
Mark S. Goldman University of South Florida
Ruth A. Baer
Ruth A. Baer University of Kentucky
David T. R. Berry
David T. R. Berry University of Kentucky
Suzanne C. Segerstrom
Suzanne C. Segerstrom University of Kentucky
Kate Flory
Kate Flory University of South Carolina
Christopher W. Kahler
Christopher W. Kahler Brown University
Thomas A. Widiger
Thomas A. Widiger University of Kentucky

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology online offers flexibility and access to a range of affordable degree options in the USA. Many students compare programs to find the best value, ensuring quality education while managing costs. Comparison sites highlight choices like the most affordable psychology degree programs in New York City, offering urban opportunities paired with budget-friendly tuition.

If you prefer nearby alternatives, affordable psychology programs in New Jersey can also deliver excellent curricula at competitive prices. You can browse a broader range of the affordable psychology programs in New Jersey to further widen your options.

New York State overall provides diverse online and traditional pathways; explore the most affordable psychology degree programs in New York for opportunities outside the city. Additionally, out-of-state learners might benefit from different pricing and learning environments—consider the most affordable psychology degree programs in Ohio as well.

Graduates in psychology can pursue careers as counselors, researchers, mental health professionals, or continue to postgraduate study. Choosing a cost-effective, accredited program online supports both your career goals and financial wellness.

Best Scientists Citing Gregory T. Smith

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles