World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 41 7713 7197 4133 3755 148 13329

Melissa A. Cyders publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Melissa A. Cyders between 2004 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Melissa A. Cyders published across 22 years, from 2004 to 2025, averaging 7.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2021. 19 of the 171 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2004 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2021. 2004: 1 publication 2005: 2 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 15 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 17 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 10 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 12 publications
2004 2025

171 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Melissa A. Cyders: publications per year, 2004 to 2025
Year Publications
2004 1
2005 2
2006 2
2007 3
2008 3
2009 4
2010 6
2011 5
2012 8
2013 12
2014 9
2015 9
2016 15
2017 7
2018 11
2019 7
2020 11
2021 17
2022 10
2023 10
2024 7
2025 12
Total 171
Download as CSV

Melissa A. Cyders publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Melissa A. Cyders sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 141–150 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 148 publications — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597 148
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Melissa A. Cyders D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Melissa A. Cyders sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40–41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671 41
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Melissa A. Cyders is affiliated with Indiana University - Purdue University Indianapolis in the United States. Their research spans multiple domains within psychology and medicine, with a focus on areas related to clinical and social psychology as well as epidemiology.

Their work covers a range of topics including substance abuse treatment and outcomes, behavioral health and interventions, child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, alcohol consumption and health effects, mental health research topics, anxiety, depression, psychometrics, treatment, cognitive processes, and personality disorders and psychopathology.

Among their recent publications are:

  • Network functional connectivity underlying dissociable cognitive and affective components of empathy in adolescence, 2021, Neuropsychologia
  • Electronic nicotine delivery system use is related to higher odds of alcohol and marijuana use in adolescents: Meta-analytic evidence, 2020, Addictive Behaviors
  • To Infuse or Ingest in Human Laboratory Alcohol Research, 2020, Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research
  • Developmental Considerations for Assessment and Treatment of Impulsivity in Older Adults, 2020, Current topics in behavioral neurosciences
  • Early Impact of the U.S. COVID-19 Pandemic on Drinking Motives and Alcohol Use, 2021, Substance Use & Misuse

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Melissa A. Cyders include:

  • Melissa Liu
  • Christiana J. Prestigiacomo
  • Tamika C. B. Zapolski
  • Martin H. Plawecki
  • Jesse C. Stewart

Their publications have appeared in venues such as:

  • Frontiers in Psychiatry
  • PLoS ONE
  • PsycTESTS Dataset
  • Alcoholism Clinical and Experimental Research
  • Substance Use & Misuse

Melissa A. Cyders has contributed to book literature with a publication by Humana Press titled Translational Research Methods for Alcohol Use Disorders (2023).

Their primary fields of study include:

  • Psychology
  • Medicine

Within these fields, key subfields of focus are:

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Epidemiology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Applied Psychology
  • Social Psychology

Best Publications

  • Integration of impulsivity and positive mood to predict risky behavior: Development and validation of a measure of positive urgency.

    Melissa A. Cyders;Gregory T. Smith;Nichea S. Spillane;Sarah Fischer

  • Emotion-based dispositions to rash action: positive and negative urgency.

    Melissa A. Cyders;Gregory T. Smith

  • Examination of a short English version of the UPPS-P Impulsive Behavior Scale ☆

    Melissa A. Cyders;Andrew K. Littlefield;Scott Coffey;Kenny A. Karyadi

  • On the validity and utility of discriminating among impulsivity-like traits.

    Gregory T. Smith;Sarah Fischer;Melissa A. Cyders;Agnes M. Annus

  • Mood-based rash action and its components: Positive and negative urgency

    Melissa A. Cyders;Gregory T. Smith

  • Measurement of constructs using self-report and behavioral lab tasks: Is there overlap in nomothetic span and construct representation for impulsivity?

    Melissa A. Cyders;Ayca Coskunpinar

  • Multidimensionality in impulsivity and alcohol use: a meta-analysis using the UPPS model of impulsivity

    Ayca Coskunpinar;Allyson L. Dir;Melissa A. Cyders

  • The role of personality dispositions to risky behavior in predicting first-year college drinking.

    Melissa A. Cyders;Kate Flory;Sarah Rainer;Gregory T. Smith

  • Another look at impulsivity: a meta-analytic review comparing specific dispositions to rash action in their relationship to bulimic symptoms.

    Solomon Fischer;Gregory T. Smith;Gregory T. Smith;Melissa A. Cyders;Melissa A. Cyders

  • Positive Urgency Predicts Illegal Drug Use and Risky Sexual Behavior

    Tamika C. B. Zapolski;Melissa A. Cyders;Gregory T. Smith

  • Integrating affect and impulsivity: The role of positive and negative urgency in substance use risk.

    Gregory T. Smith;Melissa A. Cyders

  • Negative urgency: A personality predictor of externalizing behavior characterized by neuroticism, low conscientiousness, and disagreeableness.

    Regan E. Settles;Solomon Fischer;Melissa A. Cyders;Jessica L. Combs

  • Measurement invariance of the patient health questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) depression screener in U.S. adults across sex, race/ethnicity, and education level: NHANES 2005-2016.

    Jay S. Patel;Youngha Oh;Kevin L. Rand;Wei Wu

  • Understanding Differences in Sexting Behaviors Across Gender, Relationship Status, and Sexual Identity, and the Role of Expectancies in Sexting

    Allyson L. Dir;Ayca Coskunpinar;Jennifer L. Steiner;Melissa A. Cyders

  • Clarifying the role of personality dispositions in risk for increased gambling behavior.

    Melissa A. Cyders;Gregory T. Smith

  • From the bar to the bed via mobile phone: A first test of the role of problematic alcohol use, sexting, and impulsivity-related traits in sexual hookups

    Allyson L. Dir;Melissa A. Cyders;Ayca Coskunpinar

  • Longitudinal validation of the acquired preparedness model of drinking risk.

    Regan Fried Settles;Melissa A. Cyders;Gregory T. Smith

  • Impulsivity and the sexes: measurement and structural invariance of the UPPS-P Impulsive Behavior Scale.

    Melissa A. Cyders

  • A meta-analytic review of the relationship between adolescent risky sexual behavior and impulsivity across gender, age, and race.

    Allyson L. Dir;Ayca Coskunpinar;Melissa A. Cyders

  • The relationship between self-report and lab task conceptualizations of impulsivity

    Melissa A. Cyders;Ayca Coskunpinar

  • The uniqueness of negative urgency as a common risk factor for self-harm behaviors, alcohol consumption, and eating problems.

    Allyson L. Dir;Kenny Karyadi;Melissa A. Cyders

Frequent Co-Authors

Gregory T. Smith
Gregory T. Smith University of Kentucky
Mario Dzemidzic
Mario Dzemidzic Indiana University
Sean O'Connor
Sean O'Connor Indiana University
Kurt Kroenke
Kurt Kroenke Indiana University
Andrea Fossati
Andrea Fossati Vita-Salute San Raffaele University
Peter R. Finn
Peter R. Finn Indiana University
Charles R. Carlson
Charles R. Carlson University of Kentucky
Scott F. Coffey
Scott F. Coffey University of Mississippi Medical Center
Rajita Sinha
Rajita Sinha Yale University
Ellen Leibenluft
Ellen Leibenluft National Institutes of Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you are interested in a career in psychology, you may also want to explore related online degrees and alternative career pathways such as social work. Online social work programs can broaden your helping skills and expand your employment options in mental health, counseling, and community advocacy roles.

Many universities now offer affordable online social work master's degrees in the South, giving students budget-friendly options without the need to relocate. Similarly, Texas residents have access to affordable online social work master's degrees in Texas, providing flexibility for in-state learners seeking to balance work or family commitments with advanced education.

Nationwide, there are a growing number of affordable online social work master's degrees in USA, offering a variety of specialties and concentrations. If you reside in the Midwest, you may want to review affordable online social work programs in Ohio, which can open doors to new roles in social services, hospitals, or nonprofit organizations.

Exploring these online degree options can help you find the right fit and set you on a meaningful career pathway alongside your studies in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Melissa A. Cyders

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles