World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 47 6096 5667 3316 3009 87 11358

Sarah L. Friedman publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Sarah L. Friedman between 1972 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Sarah L. Friedman published across 54 years, from 1972 to 2025, averaging 1.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 9 publications in 2003. 7 of the 99 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1972 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 9. Peak 9 publications in 2003. 1972: 1 publication 1973: 1 publication 1974: 0 publications 1975: 1 publication 1976: 0 publications 1977: 1 publication 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 1 publication 1981: 3 publications 1982: 3 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 1 publication 1985: 0 publications 1986: 5 publications 1987: 5 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 1 publication 1990: 2 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 1 publication 1994: 3 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 2 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 0 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 1 publication 2013: 0 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 0 publications 2016: 0 publications 2017: 1 publication 2018: 1 publication 2019: 1 publication 2020: 0 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 4 publications
1972 2025

99 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Sarah L. Friedman: publications per year, 1972 to 2025
Year Publications
1972 1
1973 1
1974 0
1975 1
1976 0
1977 1
1978 0
1979 0
1980 1
1981 3
1982 3
1983 1
1984 1
1985 0
1986 5
1987 5
1988 1
1989 1
1990 2
1991 0
1992 1
1993 1
1994 3
1995 0
1996 1
1997 2
1998 0
1999 4
2000 0
2001 4
2002 0
2003 9
2004 5
2005 4
2006 3
2007 5
2008 5
2009 0
2010 3
2011 2
2012 1
2013 0
2014 3
2015 0
2016 0
2017 1
2018 1
2019 1
2020 0
2021 0
2022 4
2023 2
2024 3
2025 4
Total 99
Download as CSV

Sarah L. Friedman publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sarah L. Friedman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 81–90 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 87 publications — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605 87
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Sarah L. Friedman D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sarah L. Friedman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46–47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495 47
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1997 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Sarah L. Friedman is affiliated with George Washington University in the United States. Their research spans multiple areas within the broader field of Medicine, with a focus on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Literature and Literary Theory, Clinical Psychology, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, and General Health Professions.

Their work covers a range of main topics including Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues, Opioid Use Disorder Treatment, Themes in Literature Analysis, Medieval Literature and History, Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies, Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology, as well as Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health.

Recent publications by Sarah L. Friedman include:

  • "Spiritual AIM: assessment and documentation of spiritual needs in patients with cancer" (2021) in Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy
  • "The American Psychological Association and antisemitism: Toward equity, diversity, and inclusion." (2024) in American Psychologist
  • "Contagion, Sexual Violence, and Communal Healing in Chaucer's The Physician's Tale and Gower's Confessio Amantis" (2022) in Essays in medieval studies
  • "Hospital Experiences of Dignity in People Who Inject Drugs" (2023) in Journal of Addictions Nursing
  • "Duane F. Alexander (1940-2020)." (2022) in American Psychologist

Frequent coauthors working with Sarah L. Friedman include:

  • Carol K. Sigelman
  • Rosemarie Scolaro Moser
  • Gustav Luke Hensel
  • Gal Dubnov-Raz
  • Philip Schatz

Major journals where their work frequently appears include:

  • American Psychologist
  • Essays in medieval studies
  • Journal of Health Care Chaplaincy
  • Journal of Addictions Nursing
  • Parenting

Sarah L. Friedman was recognized as a Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) in 1997.

Best Publications

  • Identifying risk for obesity in early childhood.

    Philip R. Nader;Philip R. Nader;Marion O'Brien;Renate Houts;Robert Bradley

  • Child Care and Mother-Child Interaction in the First Three Years of Life

    M Appelbaum;DA Batten;J Belsky;C Booth

  • The relation of child care to cognitive and language development

    A Clarke-Stewart;S Friedman;Dane Phillips;CL Booth

  • Nonmaternal Care and Family Factors in Early Development: An Overview of the NICHD Study of Early Child Care

    Virginia Allhusen;Mark Appelbaum;Jay Belsky;Cathryn L. Booth

  • Duration and Developmental Timing of Poverty and Children's Cognitive and Social Development from Birth Through Third Grade.

    Virginia Allhusen;Jay Belsky;Cathryn Booth-LaForce;Robert Bradley

  • Examining the Black–White Achievement Gap Among Low-Income Children Using the NICHD Study of Early Child Care and Youth Development

    Margaret Burchinal;Kathleen McCartney;Laurence Steinberg;Robert Crosnoe

  • Child-care effect sizes for the NICHD Study of Early Child Care and Youth Development

    A Huston;C. Booth-LaForce;Robert Bradley;C. Brownell

  • Family rearing antecedents of pubertal timing.

    Jay Belsky;Laurence D. Steinberg;Renate M. Houts;Sarah L. Friedman

  • Familial factors associated with the characteristics of nonmaternal care for infants

    Mark Appelbaum;Dee Ann Batten;Jay Belsky;Cathryn Booth

  • Child care and children's peer interaction at 24 and 36 months: The NICHD study of early child care - NICHD early child care research network

    Mark Appelbaum;Dee Ann Batten;Jay Belsky;Cathryn Booth

  • Does Quality of Child Care Affect Child Outcomes at Age 4 1 ⁄ 2?

    N Marshall;CA Brownell;M Burchinal;B Caldwell

  • Type of child care and children's development at 54 months

    Virginia Allhusen;Jay Belsky;Cathryn L. Booth;Robert Bradley

  • Infant-mother attachment classification: Risk and protection in relation to changing maternal caregiving quality

    Jay Belsky;Jay Belsky;Cathryn L. Booth-LaForce;Robert Bradley;Celia A. Brownell

  • Frequency and intensity of activity of third-grade children in physical education.

    Jay Belsky;Cathryn Booth;Robert Bradley;Celia A. Brownell

  • Longitudinal Development of Secondary Sexual Characteristics in Girls and Boys Between Ages 9½ and 15½ Years

    Elizabeth J. Susman;Renate M. Houts;Laurence Steinberg;Jay Belsky

  • Instruction, Teacher-Student Relations, and Math Achievement Trajectories in Elementary School.

    Robert Crosnoe;Fred Morrison;Margaret Burchinal;Robert Pianta

  • Testing a Core Emotion‐Regulation Prediction: Does Early Attentional Persistence Moderate the Effect of Infant Negative Emotionality on Later Development?

    Jay Belsky;Sarah L. Friedman;Kuang-Hua Hsieh

  • The ecology of childhood overweight: a 12-year longitudinal analysis.

    M O'Brien;PR Nader;Renate Houts;R Bradley

  • Child-care and family predictors of preschool attachment and stability from infancy

    M Appelbaum;J Belsky;C Booth;R Bradley

  • Preterm birth and psychological development

    Sarah L. Friedman;Marian Sigman

  • Blueprints for Thinking: The Role of Planning in Cognitive Development

    Sarah L. Friedman;Ellin Kofsky Scholnick;Rodney R. Cocking

  • Duration and Developmental Timing of Poverty and Children's Cognitive and Social Development From Birth Through Third Grade National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Early Child Care Research Network

    Jay Belsky;Cathryn Booth-LaForce;Robert Bradley;Celia A. Brownell

Frequent Co-Authors

Jay Belsky
Jay Belsky University of California, Davis
Susan J. Spieker
Susan J. Spieker University of Washington
Robert C. Pianta
Robert C. Pianta University of Virginia
Margaret Burchinal
Margaret Burchinal University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Robert H. Bradley
Robert H. Bradley Arizona State University
Martha J. Cox
Martha J. Cox University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Deborah Lowe Vandell
Deborah Lowe Vandell University of California, Irvine
Bonnie Knoke
Bonnie Knoke RTI International
K. Alison Clarke-Stewart
K. Alison Clarke-Stewart University of California, Irvine
Margaret Tresch Owen
Margaret Tresch Owen The University of Texas at Dallas

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing an online degree in psychology or counseling opens a variety of career pathways, including roles in mental health services, education, social work, and human resources. Job demand is high, yet choosing the right degree program is crucial for maximizing your investment and career opportunities.

Program value can vary by state and region, influencing both tuition costs and employment prospects. For example, students interested in counseling careers can explore programs ranked among the most valuable counseling degree programs ranking in Colorado. Florida also offers a diverse range of online options, highlighted by the most valuable counseling degrees in Florida.

For those considering urban environments, the most valuable counseling degrees in Los Angeles showcase programs in one of the largest markets in the country. Meanwhile, students in the Midwest can find strong value through the most valuable counseling degrees in Missouri.

By comparing programs across different states, you can tailor your academic path to meet your personal and professional goals within psychology and counseling.

Best Scientists Citing Sarah L. Friedman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles