World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Michael K. Richardson

Michael K. Richardson

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
71
Citations
15611
World Ranking
6750
National Ranking
176

Michael K. Richardson publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael K. Richardson sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 246 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Michael K. Richardson D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael K. Richardson sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 71 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael K. Richardson is affiliated with Leiden University in the Netherlands. Their research encompasses significant contributions within the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology as well as Environmental Science. The scientist's work notably spans several subfields including Molecular Biology, Genetics, Ecology, Global and Planetary Change, and Nature and Landscape Conservation.

The scope of Richardson's study topics includes Venomous Animal Envenomation and Studies, Amphibian and Reptile Biology, Fish Ecology and Management Studies, Ion Channel Regulation and Function, Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation, Aquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior, and Congenital Heart Defects Research.

Recent publications by Richardson include:

  • Convergent evolution of pain-inducing defensive venom components in spitting cobras (2021, Science)
  • Snake Venom Gland Organoids (2020, Cell)
  • Convergent evolution of toxin resistance in animals (2022, Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society)
  • Nanoplastics causes extensive congenital malformations during embryonic development by passively targeting neural crest cells (2023, Environment International)
  • Dynamic genetic differentiation drives the widespread structural and functional convergent evolution of snake venom proteinaceous toxins (2022, BMC Biology)

Michael K. Richardson has frequently collaborated with several co-authors, including M. Bakker, Nicholas R. Casewell, Harald Kerkkamp, Freek J. Vonk, and Martin Rücklin. These collaborations are evident through multiple joint publications.

The scholar has also contributed to well-established publication venues with recurrent papers appearing in:

  • Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society
  • Environment International
  • BMC Biology
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Der Pathologe

Best Publications

  • Early evolution of the venom system in lizards and snakes

    Bryan G. Fry;Bryan G. Fry;Nicolas Vidal;Janette A. Norman;Freek J. Vonk

  • Bone morphogenetic proteins and a signalling pathway that controls patterning in the developing chick limb

    P.H. Francis;M.K. Richardson;P.M. Brickell;C. Tickle

  • The king cobra genome reveals dynamic gene evolution and adaptation in the snake venom system

    Freek J. Vonk;Freek J. Vonk;Freek J. Vonk;Nicholas R. Casewell;Nicholas R. Casewell;Christiaan V. Henkel;Alysha M. Heimberg

  • Translating rodent behavioral repertoire to zebrafish (Danio rerio): relevance for stress research.

    Danielle L. Champagne;Carlijn C.M. Hoefnagels;Ronald E. de Kloet;Michael K. Richardson

  • Measuring thigmotaxis in larval zebrafish.

    S J Schnörr;Peter J Steenbergen;Michael K Richardson;Danielle L Champagne

  • THERE IS NO HIGHLY CONSERVED EMBRYONIC STAGE IN THE VERTEBRATES : IMPLICATIONS FOR CURRENT THEORIES OF EVOLUTION AND DEVELOPMENT

    Michael K. Richardson;James Hanken;Mayoni L. Gooneratne;Claude Pieau

  • Overexpression of BMP-2 and BMP-4 alters the size and shape of developing skeletal elements in the chick limb

    Delphine Duprez;Esther J. de H. Bell;Michael K. Richardson;Charles W. Archer

  • The Burmese python genome reveals the molecular basis for extreme adaptation in snakes

    Todd A. Castoe;Todd A. Castoe;A. P. Jason de Koning;A. P. Jason de Koning;Kathryn T. Hall;Daren C. Card

  • Zebrafish Embryos and Larvae: A New Generation of Disease Models and Drug Screens

    Shaukat Ali;Danielle L. Champagne;Herman P. Spaink;Michael K. Richardson

  • Gene expression profiling of the long-term adaptive response to hypoxia in the gills of adult zebrafish.

    David L. M. van der Meer;Guido E. E. J. M. van den Thillart;Frans Witte;Merijn A. G. de Bakker

  • Heterochrony and the phylotypic period.

    Michael K. Richardson

  • Large-scale assessment of the zebrafish embryo as a possible predictive model in toxicity testing.

    Shaukat Ali;Harald G. J. van Mil;Michael K. Richardson

  • Patterns of avoidance behaviours in the light/dark preference test in young juvenile zebrafish: A pharmacological study

    Peter J. Steenbergen;Michael K. Richardson;Danielle L. Champagne

  • The use of the zebrafish model in stress research.

    Peter J. Steenbergen;Michael K. Richardson;Danielle L. Champagne

  • Zebrafish development and regeneration : new tools for biomedical research

    Sebastiaan A. Brittijn;Suzanne J. Duivesteijn;Mounia Belmamoune;Laura F.M. Bertens

  • Evolutionary origin and development of snake fangs.

    Freek J. Vonk;Jeroen F. Admiraal;Kate Jackson;Ram Reshef

  • Haeckel's ABC of evolution and development.

    Michael K. Richardson;Gerhard Keuck

  • Somite number and vertebrate evolution

    Michael K. Richardson;Steven P. Allen;Glenda M. Wright;Albert Raynaud

  • Discovery of a functional glucocorticoid receptor beta-isoform in zebrafish.

    Marcel J. M. Schaaf;Danielle Champagne;Ivo H. C. van Laanen;Diane C. W. A. van Wijk

  • Vertebrate evolution: The developmental origins of adult variation

    Michael K. Richardson

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert E. Poelmann
Robert E. Poelmann Leiden University
Olaf R. P. Bininda-Emonds
Olaf R. P. Bininda-Emonds Carl von Ossietzky University of Oldenburg
Marco A. M. Prado
Marco A. M. Prado University of Western Ontario
Michael I. Coates
Michael I. Coates University of Chicago
Juliano Ferreira
Juliano Ferreira Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
Herman P. Spaink
Herman P. Spaink Leiden University
Bryan G. Fry
Bryan G. Fry University of Queensland
Marcelo R. Sánchez-Villagra
Marcelo R. Sánchez-Villagra University of Zurich
Todd A. Castoe
Todd A. Castoe The University of Texas at Arlington
Lewis Wolpert
Lewis Wolpert University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Michael K. Richardson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles