World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Robert E. Poelmann

Robert E. Poelmann

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
82
Citations
21491
World Ranking
16270
National Ranking
616

Robert E. Poelmann publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert E. Poelmann sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 321 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Robert E. Poelmann D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert E. Poelmann sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 82 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Robert E. Poelmann is affiliated with Leiden University in the Netherlands and has contributed extensively to research in the field of medicine. Their research primarily focuses on pulmonary and respiratory medicine, cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, epidemiology, molecular biology, and surgery.

The scientist's work addresses several key topics, including:

  • Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
  • Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
  • Aortic aneurysm repair treatments
  • Congenital heart defects research
  • Congenital Heart Disease Studies
  • Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Studies
  • Coronary Artery Anomalies

Robert E. Poelmann has published in a variety of journals, with frequent contributions to the following venues:

  • Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease
  • Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Cardiovascular Pathology
  • Environment International
  • Journal of Clinical Medicine

Among their recent publications are:

  • "Nanoplastics causes extensive congenital malformations during embryonic development by passively targeting neural crest cells" (2023) in Environment International
  • "A Systematic Histopathologic Evaluation of Type-A Aortic Dissections Implies a Uniform Multiple-Hit Causation" (2021) in Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease
  • "Normal and abnormal development of the aortic valve and ascending aortic wall: a comprehensive overview of the embryology and pathology of the bicuspid aortic valve" (2022) in Annals of Cardiothoracic Surgery
  • "Transforming Growth Factor Beta3 is Required for Cardiovascular Development" (2020) in Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease
  • "The Development of the Ascending Aortic Wall in Tricuspid and Bicuspid Aortic Valve: A Process from Maturation to Degeneration" (2020) in Journal of Clinical Medicine

Frequent collaborators in their research include:

  • Nimrat Grewal
  • Robert J.M. Klautz
  • Adriana C. Gittenberger-de Groot
  • Antoine H.G. Driessen
  • Onur B. Dolmaci

Best Publications

  • Targeted deficiency or cytosolic truncation of the VE-cadherin gene in mice impairs VEGF-mediated endothelial survival and angiogenesis.

    Peter Carmeliet;Maria Grazia Lampugnani;Lieve Moons;Ferrucio Breviario

  • Double-Outlet Right Ventricle and Overriding Tricuspid Valve Reflect Disturbances of Looping, Myocardialization, Endocardial Cushion Differentiation, and Apoptosis in TGF-β2–Knockout Mice

    Ulrike Bartram;Daniël G. M. Molin;Lambertus J. Wisse;Azhar Mohamad

  • Evolution of an Arsenal Structural and Functional Diversification of the Venom System in the Advanced Snakes (Caenophidia)

    Bryan G. Fry;Holger Scheib;Louise van der Weerd;Bruce Young

  • Embryonic Endothelial Cells Transdifferentiate Into Mesenchymal Cells Expressing Smooth Muscle Actins In Vivo and In Vitro

    M.C. DeRuiter;R.E. Poelmann;J.C. VanMunsteren;V. Mironov

  • Development of the cardiac coronary vascular endothelium, studied with antiendothelial antibodies, in chicken-quail chimeras

    R. E. Poelmann;A. C. Gittenberger-De Groot;M. M. T. Mentink;R. Bökenkamp

  • Neural Crest Cell Contribution to the Developing Circulatory System Implications for Vascular Morphology

    Maarten Bergwerff;Marlies E. Verberne;Marco C. DeRuiter;Robert E. Poelmann

  • Basics of cardiac development for the understanding of congenital heart malformations.

    Adriana C Gittenberger-de Groot;Margot M Bartelings;Marco C Deruiter;Robert E Poelmann

  • Development of the origin of the coronary arteries, a matter of ingrowth or outgrowth?

    A. J. J. C. Bogers;A. C. Gittenberger-de Groot;R. E. Poelmann;B. M. Péault

  • Smooth muscle cells and fibroblasts of the coronary arteries derive from epithelial-mesenchymal transformation of the epicardium

    Mark-Paul F. M. Vrancken Peeters;Adriana C. Gittenberger-de Groot;Monica M. T. Mentink;Robert E. Poelmann

  • Unilateral Vitelline Vein Ligation Alters Intracardiac Blood Flow Patterns and Morphogenesis in the Chick Embryo

    B. Hogers;M.C. DeRuiter;A.C. Gittenberger-de Groot;R.E. Poelmann

  • Smooth Muscle Cell Origin and Its Relation to Heterogeneity in Development and Disease

    Adriana C. Gittenberger-de Groot;Marco C. DeRuiter;Maarten Bergwerff;Robert E. Poelmann

  • Origin, fate, and function of epicardium-derived cells (EPDCs) in normal and abnormal cardiac development.

    Heleen Lie-Venema;Nynke M S van den Akker;Noortje A M Bax;Elizabeth M Winter

  • Early development of quail heart epicardium and associated vascular and glandular structures.

    S Virágh;A C Gittenberger-de Groot;R E Poelmann;F Kálmán

  • In vivo micro particle image velocimetry measurements of blood-plasma in the embryonic avian heart.

    Peter Vennemann;Kenneth T. Kiger;Ralph Lindken;Bianca C.W. Groenendijk

  • Development of the Cardiac Conduction Tissue in Human Embryos Using HNK-1 Antigen Expression Possible Relevance for Understanding of Abnormal Atrial Automaticity

    N. A. Blom;A. C. Gittenberger-De Groot;M. C. Deruiter;R. E. Poelmann

  • Epicardial Outgrowth Inhibition Leads to Compensatory Mesothelial Outflow Tract Collar and Abnormal Cardiac Septation and Coronary Formation

    Adriana C. Gittenberger-de Groot;Mark-Paul F.M. Vrancken Peeters;Maarten Bergwerff;Monica M.T. Mentink

  • The development of the myocardium and endocardium in mouse embryos. Fusion of two heart tubes

    M. C. DeRuiter;R. E. Poelmann;I. VanderPlas-de Vries;M. M. T. Mentink

  • NEURAL CREST CELLS IN OUTFLOW TRACT SEPTATION OF THE EMBRYONIC CHICKEN HEART : DIFFERENTIATION AND APOPTOSIS

    R.E. Poelmann;T. Mikawa;A.C. Gittenberger-De Groot

  • The neural crest as a possible pathogenetic factor in coarctation of the aorta and bicuspid aortic valve.

    A.P. Kappetein;A.C. Gittenberger-de Groot;A.H. Zwinderman;J. Rohmer

  • Lack of Primary Cilia Primes Shear-Induced Endothelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition

    Anastasia D. Egorova;Padmini P.S.J. Khedoe;Marie-José T.H. Goumans;Bradley K. Yoder

Frequent Co-Authors

Martin J. Schalij
Martin J. Schalij Leiden University Medical Center
Marie-José Goumans
Marie-José Goumans Leiden University Medical Center
Ad J.J.C. Bogers
Ad J.J.C. Bogers Erasmus University Rotterdam
Michael K. Richardson
Michael K. Richardson Leiden University
Jerry Westerweel
Jerry Westerweel Delft University of Technology
Paul Steendijk
Paul Steendijk Leiden University Medical Center
Bodo Christ
Bodo Christ University of Freiburg
Glenn I. Fishman
Glenn I. Fishman New York University
Huub J. M. de Groot
Huub J. M. de Groot Leiden University
Thomas Doetschman
Thomas Doetschman University of Arizona

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in healthcare but looking for alternative routes, many online degrees offer flexibility and targeted expertise. If you’re drawn to nutrition, a best online nutrition degree can help launch a career in wellness, public health, or dietary consultation.

Aspiring healthcare managers can explore administrative roles by enrolling in a cahme accredited online mha programs list. These programs provide quality education in healthcare leadership, often recognized by hospitals and health systems.

Registered nurses hoping to advance their qualifications can pursue an online rn to bsn no clinicals program, allowing them to earn a bachelor’s degree while balancing professional duties. This pathway is ideal for working nurses who seek career growth without the challenge of clinical requirements.

For nurses aiming for the highest clinical roles, the shortest post master's dnp program options allow rapid advancement to leadership and advanced practice fields.

Exploring these diverse online programs can open new doors within the vast landscape of healthcare careers, each offering unique benefits for different professional goals.

Best Scientists Citing Robert E. Poelmann

Trending Scientists