World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Miriam C. J. M. Sturkenboom

Miriam C. J. M. Sturkenboom

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
90
Citations
31582
World Ranking
12161
National Ranking
469

Miriam C. J. M. Sturkenboom publications per year

1992: 1 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 1 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 1 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 14 publications 2003: 18 publications 2004: 19 publications 2005: 23 publications 2006: 16 publications 2007: 14 publications 2008: 27 publications 2009: 28 publications 2010: 32 publications 2011: 30 publications 2012: 29 publications 2013: 56 publications 2014: 28 publications 2015: 49 publications 2016: 32 publications 2017: 21 publications 2018: 33 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 27 publications 2021: 14 publications 2022: 26 publications 2023: 22 publications 2024: 23 publications 2025: 18 publications
1992 2025

625 publications in total across all disciplines

Miriam C. J. M. Sturkenboom publication distribution in Medicine in 2027

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2027. The highlighted bar marks where Miriam C. J. M. Sturkenboom sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 545 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Miriam C. J. M. Sturkenboom D-index placement in Medicine in 2027

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2027. The highlighted bar marks where Miriam C. J. M. Sturkenboom sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 90 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Miriam C. J. M. Sturkenboom is affiliated with Utrecht University in the Netherlands. The scientist's research primarily spans the field of Medicine, with a focus on several subfields including Infectious Diseases, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Epidemiology, Health, and Toxicology.

Major topics addressed in their work include Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy, SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research, Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions, Pregnancy and Medication Impact, COVID-19 Impact on Reproduction, Influenza Virus Research Studies, and Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, and Quality of Life.

Key recent publications demonstrate a focus on vaccine safety and real-world medical data analysis. Notable papers include:

  • The critical role of background rates of possible adverse events in the assessment of COVID-19 vaccine safety, 2021, Vaccine
  • Multinational cohort study of mortality in patients with asthma and severe asthma, 2020, Respiratory Medicine
  • Background rates of 41 adverse events of special interest for COVID-19 vaccines in 10 European healthcare databases - an ACCESS cohort study, 2022, Vaccine
  • From Inception to ConcePTION: Genesis of a Network to Support Better Monitoring and Communication of Medication Safety During Pregnancy and Breastfeeding, 2021, Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
  • Different Strategies to Execute Multi-Database Studies for Medicines Surveillance in Real-World Setting: A Reflection on the European Model, 2020, Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics

Frequent co-authors include Rosa Gini, Carlos E. Durán, Patrick C. Souverein, Barbara Law, and Corinne Willame.

The scientist has published extensively in several venues. Most notably, there are publications in:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) with 66 publications
  • Vaccine with 13 publications
  • Drug Safety with 11 publications
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) with 10 publications
  • Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety with 8 publications

Miriam C. J. M. Sturkenboom has contributed to book publications, including a titled work:

  • Databases for Pharmacoepidemiological Research, published by Springer International Publishing in 2021

Best Publications

  • Quantifying the heart failure epidemic: prevalence, incidence rate, lifetime risk and prognosis of heart failure The Rotterdam Study.

    Gysèle S. Bleumink;Anneke M. Knetsch;Miriam C.J.M. Sturkenboom;Sabine M.J.M. Straus

  • Risk of community-acquired pneumonia and use of gastric acid-suppressive drugs.

    Robert J. F. Laheij;Miriam C. J. M. Sturkenboom;Robert-Jan Hassing;Jeanne Dieleman

  • The incidence of complex regional pain syndrome: a population-based study.

    M. de Mos;A.G.J. de Bruijn;F.J.P.M. Huygen;J.P. Dieleman

  • Prolonged QTc interval and risk of sudden cardiac death in a population of older adults

    Sabine M.J.M. Straus;Jan A. Kors;Marie L. De Bruin;Cornelis S. van der Hooft

  • Incidence of facial pain in the general population.

    Joseph S.H.A. Koopman;Jeanne P. Dieleman;Frank J. Huygen;Marissa de Mos

  • Medication adherence and the risk of severe asthma exacerbations: a systematic review

    Marjolein Engelkes;Hettie M. Janssens;Johan C. de Jongste;Miriam C.J.M. Sturkenboom

  • Individual NSAIDs and Upper Gastrointestinal Complications

    Jordi Castellsague;Nuria Riera-Guardia;Brian Calingaert;Cristina Varas-Lorenzo

  • Incidence and prevalence of lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia in primary care--the Triumph project.

    K.M.C Verhamme;J.P Dieleman;G.S Bleumink;J van der Lei

  • Incidence rates and treatment of neuropathic pain conditions in the general population.

    Jeanne P. Dieleman;Joost Kerklaan;Frank J.P.M. Huygen;Paul A.D. Bouma

  • The reporting of studies conducted using observational routinely collected health data statement for pharmacoepidemiology (RECORD-PE)

    Sinéad M Langan;Sigrún Aj Schmidt;Kevin Wing;Vera Ehrenstein

  • Increasing incidence of Barrett’s oesophagus in the general population

    E.M. van Soest;Jeanne Dieleman;Peter Siersema;Miriam Sturkenboom

  • Individual NSAIDs and Upper Gastrointestinal Complications: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies (the SOS Project)

    Jordi Castellsague;Nuria Riera-Guardia;Brian Calingaert;Cristina Varas-Lorenzo

  • Genome-wide association study of intracranial aneurysm identifies three new risk loci

    Katsuhito Yasuno;Kaya Bilguvar;Philippe Bijlenga;Siew Kee Low

  • Antipsychotics and the Risk of Sudden Cardiac Death

    Sabine M. J. M. Straus;Gysèle S. Bleumink;Jeanne P. Dieleman;Johan van der Lei

  • Reporting to Improve Reproducibility and Facilitate Validity Assessment for Healthcare Database Studies V1.0

    Shirley V. Wang;Shirley V. Wang;Sebastian Schneeweiss;Sebastian Schneeweiss;Marc L. Berger;Jeffrey Brown

  • Increased risk of achilles tendon rupture with quinolone antibacterial use, especially in elderly patients taking oral corticosteroids.

    Paul D. van der Linden;Miriam C. J. M. Sturkenboom;Ron M. C. Herings;Hubert M. G. Leufkens

  • Combining electronic healthcare databases in Europe to allow for large-scale drug safety monitoring: the EU-ADR Project.

    Preciosa M. Coloma;Martijn J. Schuemie;Gianluca Trifirò;Rosa Gini

  • Non-cardiac QTc-prolonging drugs and the risk of sudden cardiac death

    Sabine M.J.M. Straus;Miriam C.J.M. Sturkenboom;Gysèle S. Bleumink;Jeanne P. Dieleman

  • Non-steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs and Risk of Heart Failure in Four European Countries: Nested Case-Control Study

    Andrea Arfè;Lorenza Scotti;Cristina Varas-Lorenzo;Federica Nicotra

  • The incidence of narcolepsy in Europe: Before, during, and after the influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 pandemic and vaccination campaigns

    Leonoor Wijnans;Coralie Lecomte;Corinne de Vries;Daniel Weibel

Frequent Co-Authors

Martijn J. Schuemie
Martijn J. Schuemie Janssen (Belgium)
Bruno H. Stricker
Bruno H. Stricker Erasmus University Rotterdam
Carlo Giaquinto
Carlo Giaquinto University of Padua
Nicholas Moore
Nicholas Moore University of Bordeaux
Lars Pedersen
Lars Pedersen Aarhus University
Ian C. K. Wong
Ian C. K. Wong University of Hong Kong
Ernst J. Kuipers
Ernst J. Kuipers Nanyang Technological University
Wiro J. Niessen
Wiro J. Niessen University Medical Center Groningen
Giovanni Corrao
Giovanni Corrao University of Milano-Bicocca
Guy Brusselle
Guy Brusselle Ghent University Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in healthcare, various online degrees provide flexible pathways into the medical field. Many opt for medical billing and coding online courses as a fast entry point to healthcare administration. These courses teach essential skills for managing health records and insurance claims, and often lead to in-demand careers.

Others may pursue clinical roles by enrolling in the cheapest np programs online or seeking out the cheapest online nursing programs. These degrees prepare students for hands-on patient care and offer affordable options compared to traditional, on-campus programs.

For those aiming for leadership or academic roles, phd nursing programs online provide advanced study and research opportunities. Online learning makes these career pathways more accessible, supporting a wide range of ambitions in medicine without heavy relocation or tuition costs.

Best Scientists Citing Miriam C. J. M. Sturkenboom

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles