World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Martijn J. Schuemie

Martijn J. Schuemie

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
51
Citations
10872
World Ranking
5318
National Ranking
60

Martijn J. Schuemie publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martijn J. Schuemie sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 152 publications — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Martijn J. Schuemie D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martijn J. Schuemie sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Martijn J. Schuemie is affiliated with Janssen in Belgium. Their research primarily spans the field of Medicine, with a notable focus on Statistics and Probability, Economics and Econometrics, Epidemiology, Infectious Diseases, and Artificial Intelligence as subfields.

The scientist's work covers a range of main topics including Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, and Quality of Life; Advanced Causal Inference Techniques; Machine Learning in Healthcare; Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials; Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy; Influenza Virus Research Studies; and Diabetes Treatment and Management.

Martijn J. Schuemie has contributed to numerous publications in various scientific venues. Frequent venues for their publications include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Frontiers in Pharmacology
  • Drug Safety

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Martijn J. Schuemie include:

  • Association of Ticagrelor vs Clopidogrel With Net Adverse Clinical Events in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (2020, JAMA)
  • Comparative First-Line Effectiveness and Safety of ACE (Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme) Inhibitors and Angiotensin Receptor Blockers: A Multinational Cohort Study (2021, Hypertension)
  • Risk of hydroxychloroquine alone and in combination with azithromycin in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: a multinational, retrospective study (2020, The Lancet Rheumatology)
  • Comparison of Cardiovascular and Safety Outcomes of Chlorthalidone vs Hydrochlorothiazide to Treat Hypertension (2020, JAMA Internal Medicine)
  • Safety of hydroxychloroquine, alone and in combination with azithromycin, in light of rapid wide-spread use for COVID-19: a multinational, network cohort and self-controlled case series study (2020, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory))

The researcher collaborates closely with a group of frequent coauthors, including:

  • Patrick Ryan
  • Marc A. Suchard
  • George Hripcsak
  • Nicole Pratt
  • Talita Duarte-Salles

Best Publications

  • Research on presence in virtual reality: a survey.

    Martijn J. Schuemie;Peter van der Straaten;Merel Krijn;Charles A.P.G. van der Mast

  • Observational Health Data Sciences and Informatics (OHDSI): Opportunities for Observational Researchers

    George Hripcsak;Jon D. Duke;Nigam H. Shah;Christian G. Reich

  • Virtual reality treatment versus exposure in vivo: a comparative evaluation in acrophobia.

    P.M.G Emmelkamp;M Krijn;A.M Hulsbosch;S de Vries

  • Treatment of acrophobia in virtual reality: The role of immersion and presence

    Merel Krijn;Paul M.G Emmelkamp;Roeline Biemond;Claudius de Wilde de Ligny

  • Overview of BioCreative II gene normalization.

    Alexander A. Morgan;Zhiyong Lu;Xinglong Wang;Aaron M. Cohen

  • Feasibility and utility of applications of the common data model to multiple, disparate observational health databases

    Erica A. Voss;Rupa Makadia;Amy Matcho;Qianli Ma

  • Combining electronic healthcare databases in Europe to allow for large-scale drug safety monitoring: the EU-ADR Project.

    Preciosa M. Coloma;Martijn J. Schuemie;Gianluca Trifirò;Rosa Gini

  • Design and implementation of a standardized framework to generate and evaluate patient-level prediction models using observational healthcare data.

    Jenna Marie Reps;Martijn J. Schuemie;Marc A. Suchard;Patrick B. Ryan

  • A dictionary to identify small molecules and drugs in free text

    Kristina M. Hettne;Rob H. Stierum;Martijn J. Schuemie;Peter J. M. Hendriksen

  • Evaluating the Impact of Database Heterogeneity on Observational Study Results

    David Madigan;Patrick B. Ryan;Martijn Schuemie;Paul E. Stang

  • Anni 2.0: a multipurpose text-mining tool for the life sciences

    Rob Jelier;Martijn J Schuemie;Antoine Veldhoven;Lambert C J Dorssers

  • Evaluating large-scale propensity score performance through real-world and synthetic data experiments

    Yuxi Tian;Martijn J Schuemie;Marc A Suchard

  • Distribution of information in biomedical abstracts and full-text publications

    M. J. Schuemie;M. Weeber;B. J. A. Schijvenaars;E. M. Van Mulligen

  • Combining multiple healthcare databases for postmarketing drug and vaccine safety surveillance: why and how?

    G. Trifirò;G. Trifirò;P. M. Coloma;P. R. Rijnbeek;S. Romio;S. Romio

  • Identification of acute myocardial infarction from electronic healthcare records using different disease coding systems: a validation study in three European countries.

    Preciosa M Coloma;Vera E Valkhoff;Giampiero Mazzaglia;Malene Schou Nielsson

  • Word Sense Disambiguation in the Biomedical Domain: An Overview

    Martijn J. Schuemie;Jan A. Kors;Barend Mons

  • Methods for drug safety signal detection in longitudinal observational databases: LGPS and LEOPARD.

    Martijn J. Schuemie

  • Accuracy of an automated knowledge base for identifying drug adverse reactions

    E.A. Voss;R.D. Boyce;P.B. Ryan;J. van der Lei

  • Electronic healthcare databases for active drug safety surveillance: is there enough leverage?

    Preciosa M. Coloma;Gianluca Trifirò;Gianluca Trifirò;Martijn J. Schuemie;Rosa Gini

  • Renin-angiotensin system blockers and susceptibility to COVID-19: an international, open science, cohort analysis.

    Daniel R Morales;Mitchell M Conover;Seng Chan You;Nicole Pratt

  • A Reference Standard for Evaluation of Methods for Drug Safety Signal Detection Using Electronic Healthcare Record Databases

    Preciosa M Coloma;Paul Avillach;Francesco Salvo;Francesco Salvo;Martijn J Schuemie

Frequent Co-Authors

David Madigan
David Madigan Northeastern University
George Hripcsak
George Hripcsak Columbia University
Marc A. Suchard
Marc A. Suchard University of California, Los Angeles
Lars Pedersen
Lars Pedersen Aarhus University
Ian C. K. Wong
Ian C. K. Wong University of Hong Kong
Barend Mons
Barend Mons Leiden University Medical Center
Erik M. van Mulligen
Erik M. van Mulligen Erasmus University Rotterdam
William DuMouchel
William DuMouchel Oracle (United States)
David Coghill
David Coghill University of Melbourne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Interested in computer science but facing barriers such as tuition cost or academic requirements? There are several cheapest online colleges offering computer science degrees fully online, making higher education more accessible for all budgets.

If your GPA isn't as high as you'd like, don’t let that hold you back. Explore universities for low gpa that provide flexible admissions and strong support, so you can still achieve your educational goals.

Computer science knowledge opens doors to many pathways, often intersecting with other fields. For example, combining skills or interests can lead to unique roles, such as those highlighted in this overview of jobs with elementary education and environmental science degree.

If you prefer to earn your degree quicker, look into computer science accelerated program options. These programs are perfect for those aiming to enter the workforce as soon as possible with solid, in-demand skills.

Best Scientists Citing Martijn J. Schuemie

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles