World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
81
Citations
28452
World Ranking
1374
National Ranking
62

David Coghill publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Coghill sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 422 publications — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

David Coghill D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Coghill sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 81 D-Index — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

David Coghill is affiliated with the University of Melbourne in Australia. Their research primarily spans medicine and psychology, with significant contributions focused on psychiatry and mental health, cognitive neuroscience, and clinical psychology. Additional areas include pediatrics, perinatology and child health, as well as developmental and educational psychology.

Coghill's work covers a range of topics, with a predominant focus on Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). Other notable research topics include child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, autism spectrum disorder research, functional brain connectivity studies, bipolar disorder and treatment, neural and behavioral psychology studies, and infant development and preterm care.

The scientist's recent papers reflect a concentration on neurodevelopmental and psychiatric disorders. Key publications include:

  • The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based conclusions about the disorder (2021, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews)
  • Comparative efficacy and acceptability of antidepressants, psychotherapies, and their combination for acute treatment of children and adolescents with depressive disorder: a systematic review and network meta-analysis (2020, The Lancet Psychiatry)
  • Virtual Histology of Cortical Thickness and Shared Neurobiology in 6 Psychiatric Disorders (2020, JAMA Psychiatry)
  • ADHD management during the COVID-19 pandemic: guidance from the European ADHD Guidelines Group (2020, The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health)
  • Subcortical Brain Volume, Regional Cortical Thickness, and Cortical Surface Area Across Disorders: Findings From the ENIGMA ADHD, ASD, and OCD Working Groups (2020, American Journal of Psychiatry)

Frequent co-authors in Coghill's research include Tobias Banaschewski, Ian Chi Kei Wong, Jan K. Buitelaar, Samuele Cortese, and Mark A. Bellgrove. Collaborative efforts with these researchers have contributed to the advance of knowledge in fields related to ADHD and psychiatric disorders.

Coghill has published extensively in several academic journals. The most frequent venues include:

  • Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
  • Journal of Attention Disorders
  • The Lancet Psychiatry
  • European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
  • Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry

Best Publications

  • Nonpharmacological Interventions for ADHD: Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials of Dietary and Psychological Treatments

    Edmund J S Sonuga-Barke;Daniel Brandeis;Samuele Cortese;David Daley

  • Comparative efficacy and tolerability of medications for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder in children, adolescents, and adults: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

    Samuele Cortese;Nicoletta Adamo;Cinzia Del Giovane;Christina Mohr-Jensen

  • The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based Conclusions about the Disorder

    Stephen V. Faraone;Tobias Banaschewski;David Coghill;Yi Zheng

  • ADHD in children and young people: prevalence, care pathways, and service provision.

    Kapil Sayal;Vibhore Prasad;David Daley;Tamsin Ford

  • Evidence-based guidelines for treating bipolar disorder: Revised third edition recommendations from the British Association for Psychopharmacology

    G. M. Goodwin;P. M. Haddad;I. N. Ferrier;J. K. Aronson

  • European clinical guidelines for hyperkinetic disorder-first upgrade

    Eric Taylor;Manfred Döpfner;Joseph Sergeant;Philip Asherson

  • Comparative efficacy and tolerability of antidepressants for major depressive disorder in children and adolescents: a network meta-analysis.

    Andrea Cipriani;Xinyu Zhou;Cinzia Del Giovane;Sarah E Hetrick

  • The quality of life of children with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a systematic review

    Marina Danckaerts;Edmund J. S. Sonuga‐Barke;Tobias Banaschewski;Jan K. Buitelaar

  • Long-acting medications for the hyperkinetic disorders: a systematic review and European treatment guideline

    Tobias Banaschewski;David Coghill;Paramala Santosh;Alessandro Zuddas

  • European guidelines on managing adverse effects of medication for ADHD.

    J. Graham;T. Banaschewski;J.K. Buitelaar;D. Coghill

  • The validity, reliability and normative scores of the parent, teacher and self report versions of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in China

    Yasong Du;Jianhua Kou;David Coghill

  • Brain Imaging of the Cortex in ADHD: A Coordinated Analysis of Large-Scale Clinical and Population-Based Samples

    Martine Hoogman;Ryan Muetzel;Joao P. Guimaraes;Elena Shumskaya

  • Practitioner review: current best practice in the management of adverse events during treatment with ADHD medications in children and adolescents

    Samuele Cortese;Samuele Cortese;Martin Holtmann;Tobias Banaschewski;Jan Buitelaar

  • Molecular genetics of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: an overview.

    Tobias Banaschewski;Katja Becker;Susann Scherag;Barbara Franke

  • Annual Research Review: Categories versus dimensions in the classification and conceptualisation of child and adolescent mental disorders – implications of recent empirical study

    David Coghill;Edmund J.S. Sonuga-Barke;Edmund J.S. Sonuga-Barke

  • Neurofeedback for Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: Meta-Analysis of Clinical and Neuropsychological Outcomes From Randomized Controlled Trials.

    Samuele Cortese;Maite Ferrin;Daniel Brandeis;Martin Holtmann

  • Psychosocial risk factors for suicidality in children and adolescents

    J. J. Carballo;C. Llorente;L. Kehrmann;I. Flamarique

  • Evidence-based guidelines for the pharmacological management of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: Update on recommendations from the British Association for Psychopharmacology

    Blanca Bolea-Alamañac;David J Nutt;Marios Adamou;Phillip Asherson

  • Comparative efficacy and acceptability of antidepressants, psychotherapies, and their combination for acute treatment of children and adolescents with depressive disorder: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

    Xinyu Zhou;Teng Teng;Yuqing Zhang;Cinzia Del Giovane

  • Effects of Methylphenidate on Cognitive Functions in Children and Adolescents with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: Evidence from a Systematic Review and a Meta-Analysis

    David R. Coghill;Sarah Seth;Sara Pedroso;Tatiana Usala

  • Prenatal Risk Factors and the Etiology of ADHD-Review of Existing Evidence.

    Emma Sciberras;Emma Sciberras;Melissa Mulraney;Desiree Silva;David Coghill;David Coghill

  • The genetics of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.

    David Coghill;Tobias Banaschewski

Frequent Co-Authors

Tobias Banaschewski
Tobias Banaschewski Heidelberg University
Alessandro Zuddas
Alessandro Zuddas University of Cagliari
Edmund J.S. Sonuga-Barke
Edmund J.S. Sonuga-Barke King's College London
Ian C. K. Wong
Ian C. K. Wong University of Hong Kong
Jan K. Buitelaar
Jan K. Buitelaar Radboud University
Hans-Christoph Steinhausen
Hans-Christoph Steinhausen University of Southern Denmark
Ralf W. Dittmann
Ralf W. Dittmann Heidelberg University
Philip Asherson
Philip Asherson King's College London
Eric Taylor
Eric Taylor King's College London
Aribert Rothenberger
Aribert Rothenberger University of Göttingen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in psychology opens doors to various online degrees and specialized pathways, most notably in counseling. Selecting the right program is crucial, and affordability is a key consideration for many students. There are abundant options nationwide, with several states offering programs that stand out for their value.

For those considering the West Coast, the affordable counseling programs in California present a robust selection for aspiring professionals. In the Midwest, students can research the cheapest counseling programs in Chicago to help minimize student debt while receiving a quality education.

The Rocky Mountain region also offers notable choices, especially for those interested in the most affordable counseling degree programs in Colorado. Alternatively, in the Northeast, prospective students can look into the most affordable counseling degree programs in Connecticut for even more budget-friendly options.

Whether aiming for licensure as a counselor, social worker, or psychologist, choosing an affordable online program is a practical first step on your educational and career journey.

Best Scientists Citing David Coghill

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles