World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 83 15669 14740 510 484 649 23842

Nicholas Moore publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Nicholas Moore between 1969 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Nicholas Moore published across 58 years, from 1969 to 2026, averaging 12.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 50 publications in 2014. 3 of the 740 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1969 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 50. Peak 50 publications in 2014. 1969: 1 publication 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 1 publication 1983: 1 publication 1984: 6 publications 1985: 6 publications 1986: 3 publications 1987: 3 publications 1988: 3 publications 1989: 6 publications 1990: 8 publications 1991: 11 publications 1992: 8 publications 1993: 10 publications 1994: 9 publications 1995: 7 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 9 publications 2002: 18 publications 2003: 20 publications 2004: 17 publications 2005: 25 publications 2006: 21 publications 2007: 46 publications 2008: 16 publications 2009: 32 publications 2010: 24 publications 2011: 32 publications 2012: 33 publications 2013: 33 publications 2014: 50 publications 2015: 24 publications 2016: 39 publications 2017: 49 publications 2018: 36 publications 2019: 29 publications 2020: 27 publications 2021: 21 publications 2022: 16 publications 2023: 10 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 2 publications 2026: 1 publication
1969 2026

740 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Nicholas Moore: publications per year, 1969 to 2026
Year Publications
1969 1
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 1
1983 1
1984 6
1985 6
1986 3
1987 3
1988 3
1989 6
1990 8
1991 11
1992 8
1993 10
1994 9
1995 7
1996 4
1997 4
1998 5
1999 5
2000 5
2001 9
2002 18
2003 20
2004 17
2005 25
2006 21
2007 46
2008 16
2009 32
2010 24
2011 32
2012 33
2013 33
2014 50
2015 24
2016 39
2017 49
2018 36
2019 29
2020 27
2021 21
2022 16
2023 10
2024 4
2025 2
2026 1
Total 740
Download as CSV

Nicholas Moore publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nicholas Moore sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 641–660 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 649 publications — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371 649
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Nicholas Moore D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nicholas Moore sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 82–83 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 83 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027 83
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Nicholas Moore is affiliated with the University of Bordeaux in France. Their research primarily focuses on the fields of Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with a substantial number of publications in Infectious Diseases, Epidemiology, Clinical Biochemistry, Molecular Medicine, and Microbiology.

The main topics of interest in Nicholas Moore's work include bacterial identification and susceptibility testing, antibiotic resistance in bacteria, SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research, SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing, Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research, Mycobacterium research and diagnosis, and antifungal resistance and susceptibility.

Frequent publication venues for Moore include:

  • Open Forum Infectious Diseases
  • Clinical Infectious Diseases
  • Antimicrobial Stewardship & Healthcare Epidemiology
  • Journal of Clinical Microbiology
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Among recent papers authored or co-authored by Moore are the following:

  • Comparison of Two Commercial Molecular Tests and a Laboratory-Developed Modification of the CDC 2019-nCoV Reverse Transcriptase PCR Assay for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2, 2020, Journal of Clinical Microbiology
  • Longitudinal genomic surveillance of carriage and transmission of Clostridioides difficile in an intensive care unit, 2023, Nature Medicine
  • Pathogen genomics in healthcare: overcoming barriers to proactive surveillance, 2024, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
  • Sunflower pollen induces rapid excretion in bumble bees: Implications for host-pathogen interactions, 2022, Journal of Insect Physiology
  • Change of Plans: Overview of Bacterial Taxonomy, Recent Changes of Medical Importance, and Potential Areas of Impact, 2023, Open Forum Infectious Diseases

Collaborations have been repeated with several co-authors, reflecting ongoing research partnerships. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Mary K. Hayden
  • Sarah E. Sansom
  • Michael Y. Lin
  • Christine Fukuda
  • Haiying Li

Best Publications

  • Trough imatinib plasma levels are associated with both cytogenetic and molecular responses to standard-dose imatinib in chronic myeloid leukemia

    Stephane Picard;Karine Titier;Gabriel Etienne;Emmanuelle Teilhet

  • Assessment of handling of inhaler devices in real life: an observational study in 3811 patients in primary care.

    M. Molimard;C. Raherison;S. Lignot;F. Depont

  • Fatigue, sleep restriction and driving performance

    Pierre Philip;Patricia Sagaspe;Nicholas Moore;Jacques Taillard

  • Frequency and cost of serious adverse drug reactions in a department of general medicine.

    Nicholas Moore;Dominique Lecointre;Catherine Noblet;Michel Mabille

  • The national healthcare system claims databases in France, SNIIRAM and EGB: Powerful tools for pharmacoepidemiology.

    Julien Bezin;Julien Bezin;Mai Duong;Régis Lassalle;Cécile Droz

  • Fatigue, sleepiness, and performance in simulated versus real driving conditions.

    Pierre Philip;Patricia Sagaspe;Jacques Taillard;Cedric Valtat

  • Age, performance and sleep deprivation.

    Pierre Philip;Jacques Taillard;Patricia Sagaspe;Cedric Valtat

  • Adverse drug reactions and drug-drug interactions with over-the-counter NSAIDs.

    Nicholas Moore;Charles Pollack;Paul Butkerait

  • Prospective, multicentre, randomized, double-blind study of the efficacy of escitalopram versus citalopram in outpatient treatment of major depressive disorder.

    Nicholas Moore;Hélène Verdoux;Bruno Fantino

  • Trends in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder medication use: a retrospective observational study using population-based databases

    Sudha R. Raman;Kenneth K.C. Man;Shahram Bahmanyar;Anick Berard

  • Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbation and inhaler device handling: real-life assessment of 2935 patients

    Mathieu Molimard;Chantal Raherison;Severine Lignot;Aurelie Balestra

  • The Effects of Coffee and Napping on Nighttime Highway Driving: A Randomized Trial

    Pierre Philip;Jacques Taillard;Nicholas Moore;Sandrine Delord

  • Adverse drug reaction monitoring: doing it the French way.

    N. Moore;G. Paux;B. Begaud;M. Biour

  • ACAMPROSATE APPEARS TO DECREASE ALCOHOL INTAKE IN WEANED ALCOHOLICS

    J. P. Lhuintre;N. Moore;G. Tran;L. Steru

  • Adverse drug reactions in a department of systemic diseases-oriented internal medicine: prevalence, incidence, direct costs and avoidability.

    R Lagnaoui;N Moore;J Fach;M Longy-Boursier

  • Impact of safety alerts on measures of disproportionality in spontaneous reporting databases: the notoriety bias.

    Antoine Pariente;Fleur Gregoire;Annie Fourrier-Reglat;Françoise Haramburu

  • The self-reported Montgomery-Åsberg depression rating scale is a useful evaluative tool in major depressive disorder

    Bruno Fantino;Nicholas Moore

  • Ability of Calcium bis-Acetyl Homotaurine, a GABA Agonist, to Prevent Relapse in Weaned Alcoholics

    J. P. Lhuintre;N. D. Moore;C. Saligaut;F. Boismare

  • Benzodiazepine use in an elderly community-dwelling population. Characteristics of users and factors associated with subsequent use.

    Annie Fourrier;Luc Letenneur;Jean Francois Dartigues;Nicholas Moore

  • Data mining on electronic health record databases for signal detection in pharmacovigilance: which events to monitor?

    Gianluca Trifirò;Antoine Pariente;Antoine Pariente;Preciosa M Coloma;Jan A Kors

Frequent Co-Authors

Pierre Philip
Pierre Philip University of Bordeaux
Emmanuel Lagarde
Emmanuel Lagarde University of Bordeaux
Philip C. Robinson
Philip C. Robinson University of Queensland
Bernard Bioulac
Bernard Bioulac University of Bordeaux
Jean Dallongeville
Jean Dallongeville Institut Pasteur
Jean-François Dartigues
Jean-François Dartigues University of Bordeaux
Alain Ravaud
Alain Ravaud University of Bordeaux
Nicolas Danchin
Nicolas Danchin Université Paris Cité

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re passionate about healthcare, there are several flexible online degree options and alternative career paths to consider alongside traditional medical degrees. For those interested in nursing but seeking a more accessible entry point, ADN programs (Associate Degree in Nursing) offer a streamlined route into the field with fewer prerequisites than typical BSN programs.

Financial concerns are common, but many programs provide support. For example, you can explore medical billing and coding schools that accept financial aid, making it easier to enter crucial, high-demand roles in healthcare administration without breaking the bank.

The path to nursing doesn’t always involve lengthy or complicated exams. Many students look for do you have to take the teas test to get into nursing school as part of their research, and will find reputable programs that either do not require these exams or offer alternatives.

For those interested in the management side of healthcare, an online health administration degree can open doors to leadership roles and allow you to shape the future of medical institutions.

Best Scientists Citing Nicholas Moore

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles