World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Philip C. Robinson

Philip C. Robinson

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
95
Citations
28769
World Ranking
10170
National Ranking
308

Philip C. Robinson publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip C. Robinson sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 584 publications — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Philip C. Robinson D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip C. Robinson sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 95 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Philip C. Robinson is affiliated with the University of Queensland in Australia. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine, with 135 publications, and includes significant contributions to subfields such as Surgery, Rheumatology, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging.

Robinson's research topics span various areas related to musculoskeletal and orthopedic conditions. Key topics covered in their work include:

  • Shoulder Injury and Treatment
  • Hip disorders and treatments
  • Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
  • Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Sports injuries and prevention
  • Musculoskeletal synovial abnormalities and treatments
  • Spondyloarthritis Studies and Treatments

The scientist has contributed extensively to multiple publication venues, particularly in journals focused on musculoskeletal radiology and medical imaging. Frequent venues include:

  • Seminars in Musculoskeletal Radiology
  • European Radiology
  • Skeletal Radiology
  • British Journal of Hospital Medicine
  • Computer Fraud & Security

Their recent papers illustrate a focus on imaging techniques and musculoskeletal conditions, with notable publications such as:

  • Glossary of terms for musculoskeletal radiology (2020), published in Skeletal Radiology
  • The Lisbon Agreement on Femoroacetabular Impingement Imaging-part 1: overview (2020), published in European Radiology
  • Medical imaging for plantar heel pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2022), published in Journal of Foot and Ankle Research
  • MRI in acute muscle tears in athletes: can quantitative T2 and DTI predict return to play better than visual assessment? (2020), published in European Radiology
  • The Lisbon Agreement on femoroacetabular impingement imaging-part 2: general issues, parameters, and reporting (2021), published in European Radiology

Philip C. Robinson collaborates frequently with several researchers, including:

  • Filip Vanhoenacker
  • Emma Rowbotham
  • Luca Maria Sconfienza
  • Marc-André Weber
  • P. Diana Afonso

Best Publications

  • Characteristics associated with hospitalisation for COVID-19 in people with rheumatic disease: data from the COVID-19 Global Rheumatology Alliance physician-reported registry.

    Milena Gianfrancesco;Kimme L Hyrich;Sarah Al-Adely;Loreto Carmona

  • Identification of multiple risk variants for ankylosing spondylitis through high-density genotyping of immune-related loci.

    A Cortes;J Hadler;J P Pointon

  • Factors associated with COVID-19-related death in people with rheumatic diseases: results from the COVID-19 Global Rheumatology Alliance physician-reported registry.

    Anja Strangfeld;Martin Schäfer;Milena A Gianfrancesco;Saskia Lawson-Tovey

  • The landscape of somatic mutation in normal colorectal epithelial cells

    Henry Lee-Six;Sigurgeir Olafsson;Peter Ellis;Robert J Osborne

  • Doha agreement meeting on terminology and definitions in groin pain in athletes

    Adam Weir;Peter Brukner;Eamonn Delahunt;Jan Ekstrand

  • Membrane fission by dynamin: what we know and what we need to know

    Bruno Antonny;Christopher G. Burd;Pietro de Camilli;Elizabeth H. Chen

  • Improved detection of focal liver lesions at MR imaging: multicenter comparison of Gadoxetic acid–enhanced MR images with intraoperative findings.

    Alexander Huppertz;Thomas Balzer;Anthony Blakeborough;Josy Breuer

  • Brief Report: Intestinal Dysbiosis in Ankylosing Spondylitis

    Mary-Ellen Costello;Francesco Ciccia;Dana Willner;Nicole Warrington

  • Diagnostic efficacy of gadoxetic acid (Primovist)-enhanced MRI and spiral CT for a therapeutic strategy: comparison with intraoperative and histopathologic findings in focal liver lesions

    Renate Hammerstingl;Alexander Huppertz;Josy Breuer;Thomas Balzer

  • 30 nm Chromatin Fibre Decompaction Requires both H4-K16 Acetylation and Linker Histone Eviction

    Philip J.J. Robinson;Woojin An;Andrew Routh;Fabrizio Martino

  • First 12 patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in the United States

    Stephanie A. Kujawski;Karen K Wong;Jennifer P. Collins;Lauren Epstein

  • Major histocompatibility complex associations of ankylosing spondylitis are complex and involve further epistasis with ERAP1.

    Adrian Cortes;Sara L. Pulit;Paul J. Leo;Jenny J. Pointon

  • Hepatic lesion detection: comparison of MR imaging after the administration of superparamagnetic iron oxide with dual-phase CT by using alternative-free response receiver operating characteristic analysis.

    J Ward;K S Naik;J A Guthrie;D Wilson

  • KIR2DS4 is a product of gene conversion with KIR3DL2 that introduced specificity for HLA-A*11 while diminishing avidity for HLA-C.

    Thorsten Graef;Achim K. Moesta;Paul J. Norman;Laurent Abi-Rached

  • Structure of a Complete Mediator-RNA Polymerase II Pre-Initiation Complex

    Philip J. Robinson;Michael J. Trnka;David A. Bushnell;Ralph E. Davis

  • Ivacaftor treatment of cystic fibrosis in children aged 12 to <24 months and with a CFTR gating mutation (ARRIVAL): a phase 3 single-arm study

    Margaret Rosenfeld;Claire E Wainwright;Mark Higgins;Linda T Wang

  • The mental health and wellbeing of children and adolescents in home-based foster care

    Michael G Sawyer;Josephine A Carbone;Amelia K Searle;Philip Robinson

  • Hepatocellular Carcinoma in the Cirrhotic Liver: Double-Contrast MR Imaging for Diagnosis

    Janice Ward;James A. Guthrie;David J. Scott;Julian Atchley

  • A Method for the In Vitro Reconstitution of a Defined “30 nm” Chromatin Fibre Containing Stoichiometric Amounts of the Linker Histone

    Van A.T. Huynh;Philip J.J. Robinson;Daniela Rhodes

  • Identification of multiple risk variants for ankylosing spondylitis through high-density genotyping of immune-related loci

    A. Cortes;J. Hadler;J.P. Pointon;P.C. Robinson

Frequent Co-Authors

Matthew A. Brown
Matthew A. Brown Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
Nicola Dalbeth
Nicola Dalbeth University of Auckland
Tony R. Merriman
Tony R. Merriman University of Otago
David Evans
David Evans University of Bristol
Nicholas Moore
Nicholas Moore University of Bordeaux
Jaakko Tuomilehto
Jaakko Tuomilehto University of Helsinki
John D. Reveille
John D. Reveille The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Maxime Breban
Maxime Breban University of Paris-Saclay
Roger D. Kornberg
Roger D. Kornberg Stanford University
Michael H. Weisman
Michael H. Weisman Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're interested in medicine but searching for alternative educational routes, several online degrees offer flexible and in-demand career options. For example, a online pharmd can open doors to advanced roles in pharmacy and pharmaceutical research. These programs often accommodate working professionals who need flexibility.

Management of healthcare information is another rapidly growing field. Earning a bachelor of health information management online prepares you for roles organizing and securing patient records—a vital function within hospitals and clinics.

For those interested in administrative healthcare careers, enrolling in online medical billing and coding courses can lead to positions that support medical practices by ensuring accurate billing and insurance claims processing.

Finally, nursing remains a popular pathway. Prospective nurses or those seeking career advancement can consider cheap online fnp programs to become nurse practitioners without putting their current employment on hold.

Exploring these online degree and certification options can help you tailor your medical career to suit your interests, budget, and schedule.

Best Scientists Citing Philip C. Robinson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles