World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
88
Citations
23343
World Ranking
2748
National Ranking
2

Bruno Lomonte publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bruno Lomonte sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 418 publications — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Bruno Lomonte D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bruno Lomonte sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 88 D-Index — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Bruno Lomonte is affiliated with the University of Costa Rica in Costa Rica. Their research predominantly focuses on the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, as well as Immunology and Microbiology. Within these main fields, they have a significant presence in subfields including Genetics, Molecular Biology, Virology, Paleontology, and Global and Planetary Change.

Lomonte's work covers a variety of topics related mostly to venomous animal envenomation and studies, alongside areas such as rabies epidemiology and control, ion channel regulation and function, marine invertebrate physiology and ecology, amphibian and reptile biology, biochemical and structural characterization, and healthcare and venom research.

Their frequent publication venues reflect a consistent focus on toxinology and related biological sciences, with numerous publications appearing in:

  • Toxicon
  • Journal of Proteomics
  • Toxins
  • Biochimie
  • Acta Tropica

Collaboration is a strong aspect of Lomonte's research, with frequent coauthors including:

  • Julián Fernández
  • José María Gutiérrez
  • Mahmood Sasa
  • Juan J. Calvete
  • Fabián Bonilla

Selected recent publications by Lomonte include:

  • "Varespladib (LY315920) and Methyl Varespladib (LY333013) Abrogate or Delay Lethality Induced by Presynaptically Acting Neurotoxic Snake Venoms," 2020, Toxins
  • "Discovery and optimization of a broadly-neutralizing human monoclonal antibody against long-chain α-neurotoxins from snakes," 2023, Nature Communications
  • "Development of Nanobodies Against Hemorrhagic and Myotoxic Components of Bothrops atrox Snake Venom," 2020, Frontiers in Immunology
  • "Unity Makes Strength: Exploring Intraspecies and Interspecies Toxin Synergism between Phospholipases A2 and Cytotoxins," 2020, Frontiers in Pharmacology
  • "Novel Snakebite Therapeutics Must Be Tested in Appropriate Rescue Models to Robustly Assess Their Preclinical Efficacy," 2020, Toxins

The work of Bruno Lomonte reflects a systematic approach to understanding toxin effects and therapeutic interventions, with a research career marked by notable contributions to venom research as well as broader molecular and genetic studies.

Best Publications

  • Phospholipase A2 myotoxins from Bothrops snake venoms

    José María Gutiérrez;Bruno Lomonte

  • Venoms, venomics, antivenomics

    Juan J. Calvete;Libia Sanz;Yamileth Angulo;Bruno Lomonte

  • An overview of lysine-49 phospholipase A2 myotoxins from crotalid snake venoms and their structural determinants of myotoxic action.

    Bruno Lomonte;Yamileth Angulo;Leonel Calderón

  • Host response to Bothrops asper snake venom. Analysis of edema formation, inflammatory cells, and cytokine release in a mouse model.

    Bruno Lomonte;Andrej Tarkowski;Lars Ake Hanson

  • Neutralizing interaction between heparins and myotoxin II, a lysine 49 phospholipase A2 from Bothrops asper snake venom. Identification of a heparin-binding and cytolytic toxin region by the use of synthetic peptides and molecular modeling.

    B Lomonte;E Moreno;A Tarkowski;L A Hanson

  • Cellular pathology induced by snake venom phospholipase A2 myotoxins and neurotoxins: common aspects of their mechanisms of action

    Cesare Montecucco;Cesare Montecucco;José María Gutiérrez;Bruno Lomonte

  • Snake Venomics of the Central American Rattlesnake Crotalus simus and the South American Crotalus durissus Complex Points to Neurotoxicity as an Adaptive Paedomorphic Trend along Crotalus Dispersal in South America

    Juan J Calvete;Libia Sanz;Pedro Cid;Pilar de la Torre

  • Medicinal Plants with Inhibitory Properties Against Snake Venoms

    Andreimar Martins Soares;Fábio K. Ticli;Silvana Marcussi;Miriam V. Lourenço

  • Phospholipases A2: Unveiling the secrets of a functionally versatile group of snake venom toxins

    José María Gutiérrez;Bruno Lomonte

  • A new muscle damaging toxin, myotoxin II, from the venom of the snake Bothrops asper (terciopelo).

    Bruno Lomonte;José María Gutiérrez

  • Snake population venomics and antivenomics of Bothrops atrox: Paedomorphism along its transamazonian dispersal and implications of geographic venom variability on snakebite management

    Juan J. Calvete;Libia Sanz;Alicia Pérez;Adolfo Borges

  • Bactericidal activity of Lys49 and Asp49 myotoxic phospholipases A2 from Bothrops asper snake venom--synthetic Lys49 myotoxin II-(115-129)-peptide identifies its bactericidal region

    Leandro Páramo;Bruno Lomonte;Javier Pizarro-Cerdá;José-Antonio Bengoechea

  • Snake venomics and antivenomics : Proteomic tools in the design and control of antivenoms for the treatment of snakebite envenoming

    José María Gutiérrez;Bruno Lomonte;Guillermo León;Alberto Alape-Girón

  • Local tissue damage induced by Bothrops snake venoms - A review

    José María Gutiérrez;Bruno Lomonte

  • Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships of immunoglobulin therapy for envenomation.

    José María Gutiérrez;Guillermo León;Bruno Lomonte

  • Neutralization of local tissue damage induced by Bothrops asper (terciopelo) snake venom

    José María Gutiérrez;Guillermo León;Gustavo Rojas;Bruno Lomonte

  • Myotoxin II from Bothrops asper (terciopelo) venom is a lysine-49 phospholipase A2

    Brian Francis;Jose Maria Gutierrez;Bruno Lomonte;Ivan I. Kaiser

  • Myotoxic phospholipases A2 in Bothrops snake venoms: Effect of chemical modifications on the enzymatic and pharmacological properties of bothropstoxins from Bothrops jararacussu

    Silvia H. Andrião-Escarso;Andreimar Martins Soares;Andreimar Martins Soares;Veridiana M. Rodrigues;Yamileth Angulo

  • Snake venomics and antivenomics of Bothrops atrox venoms from Colombia and the Amazon regions of Brazil, Perú and Ecuador suggest the occurrence of geographic variation of venom phenotype by a trend towards paedomorphism

    Vitelbina Núñez;Pedro Cid;Libia Sanz;Pilar De La Torre

  • Snake venom Lys49 myotoxins: From phospholipases A2 to non-enzymatic membrane disruptors

    Bruno Lomonte;José Rangel

Frequent Co-Authors

José María Gutiérrez
José María Gutiérrez University of Costa Rica
Juan J. Calvete
Juan J. Calvete Spanish National Research Council
Yamileth Angulo
Yamileth Angulo University of Costa Rica
Libia Sanz
Libia Sanz Spanish National Research Council
Alexandra Rucavado
Alexandra Rucavado University of Costa Rica
Edgardo Moreno
Edgardo Moreno National University of Costa Rica
Lars Å. Hanson
Lars Å. Hanson University of Gothenburg
Cesare Montecucco
Cesare Montecucco University of Padua
Andrej Tarkowski
Andrej Tarkowski University of Gothenburg
Ole Lund
Ole Lund Danish National Genome Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Biology and Biochemistry often leads to a variety of rewarding careers in healthcare and life sciences. Thanks to advancements in online education, many specialized degrees are now more accessible for students anywhere in the world.

For those interested in administrative roles, it’s worth considering is medical billing and coding a good career. This pathway blends healthcare knowledge with data management skills, offering job stability and flexibility.

Another promising field is health records and data management. If you want to keep healthcare systems running smoothly, look into an online health information management degree. Online programs in this field are designed with affordability and working professionals in mind.

For those passionate about nutrition and health, advanced study can shape your prospects. Learn more about the cost of masters degree in nutrition; online options make it possible to progress without pausing your career.

Finally, if you are drawn to diagnostic imaging, consider online sonography programs, which blend scientific coursework with practical skills training. These programs open doors to fast-growing, well-paid healthcare jobs.

Best Scientists Citing Bruno Lomonte

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles