World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
79
Citations
23613
World Ranking
17529
National Ranking
584

Geoffrey K. Isbister publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Geoffrey K. Isbister sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 577 publications — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Geoffrey K. Isbister D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Geoffrey K. Isbister sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 79 D-Index — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Geoffrey K. Isbister is affiliated with the University of Newcastle Australia in Australia. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with notable contributions across both disciplines.

Their subfield expertise includes Genetics, Virology, Paleontology, Emergency Medicine, and Pharmacology. The main topics covered in their work include Venomous Animal Envenomation and Studies, Rabies epidemiology and control, Marine Invertebrate Physiology and Ecology, Poisoning and overdose treatments, Ion channel regulation and function, Drug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and Protection, and Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies.

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Geoffrey K. Isbister include Katherine Isoardi, Anjana Silva, Angela L. Chiew, Nicholas A. Buckley, and Wayne C. Hodgson.

Geoffrey K. Isbister has published extensively in several scientific journals, with the highest number of publications appearing in Clinical Toxicology, followed by Toxins, Toxicon, British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, and Emergency Medicine Australasia.

Some recent publications from Geoffrey K. Isbister include:

  • Investigating Toxin Diversity and Abundance in Snake Venom Proteomes, 2022, Frontiers in Pharmacology
  • Current research into snake antivenoms, their mechanisms of action and applications, 2020, Biochemical Society Transactions
  • A current perspective on snake venom composition and constituent protein families, 2022, Archives of Toxicology
  • Snakebite associated thrombotic microangiopathy: a systematic review of clinical features, outcomes, and evidence for interventions including plasmapheresis, 2020, PLoS neglected tropical diseases
  • Bedside Coagulation Tests in Diagnosing Venom-Induced Consumption Coagulopathy in Snakebite, 2020, Toxins

Best Publications

  • The Hunter Serotonin Toxicity Criteria: simple and accurate diagnostic decision rules for serotonin toxicity.

    E.J.C. Dunkley;G.K. Isbister;D. Sibbritt;A.H. Dawson

  • Pesticide poisoning in the developing world—a minimum pesticides list

    Michael Eddleston;Lakshman Karalliedde;Nick Buckley;Ravindra Fernando

  • A Review and Database of Snake Venom Proteomes

    Theo Tasoulis;Geoffrey K. Isbister

  • Relative Toxicity of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors (SSRIs) in Overdose

    Geoffrey K. Isbister;Steven J. Bowe;Andrew Dawson;Ian M. Whyte

  • Hyperbaric oxygen for carbon monoxide poisoning

    Nick A Buckley;David N Juurlink;Geoff Isbister;Michael H Bennett

  • Anaphylaxis: clinical patterns, mediator release, and severity.

    Simon G A Brown;Shelley F. Stone;Daniel M. Fatovich;Daniel M. Fatovich;Sally A Burrows

  • Neurotoxic marine poisoning

    Geoffrey K Isbister;Matthew C Kiernan

  • Serotonin toxicity: a practical approach to diagnosis and treatment.

    Geoffrey K Isbister;Nicholas A Buckley;Ian M Whyte

  • The pathophysiology of serotonin toxicity in animals and humans: implications for diagnosis and treatment.

    Geoffrey K. Isbister;Nicholas A. Buckley

  • Drug-induced QT prolongation and torsades de pointes: evaluation of a QT nomogram

    A. Chan;G.K. Isbister;C.M.J. Kirkpatrick;S.B. Dufful

  • Snakebite Doesn't Cause Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation: Coagulopathy and Thrombotic Microangiopathy in Snake Envenoming

    Geoffrey K Isbister

  • Medical Aspects of Spider Bites

    Richard S. Vetter;Geoffrey K. Isbister

  • Current treatment for venom-induced consumption coagulopathy resulting from snakebite.

    Kalana Maduwage;Geoffrey K. Isbister

  • Acute tetrodotoxin-induced neurotoxicity after ingestion of puffer fish.

    Matthew C. Kiernan;Geoffrey K. Isbister;Cindy S.-Y. Lin;David Burke

  • Randomized Controlled Trial of Intramuscular Droperidol Versus Midazolam for Violence and Acute Behavioral Disturbance: The DORM Study

    Geoffrey K. Isbister;Leonie A. Calver;Colin B. Page;Colin B. Page;Barrie Stokes

  • Elevated serum cytokines during human anaphylaxis: identification of potential mediators of acute allergic reactions

    Shelley F. Stone;Claire Cotterell;Geoffrey K. Isbister;Anna Holdgate

  • Drug induced QT prolongation: the measurement and assessment of the QT interval in clinical practice

    Geoffrey K. Isbister;Colin B. Page;Colin B. Page

  • Hematologic Effects and Complications of Snake Envenoming

    Ingrid Berling;Geoffrey K. Isbister

  • Antivenom treatment in arachnidism.

    Geoffrey K. Isbister;Andis Graudins;Julian White;David Warrell

  • Baclofen overdose: defining the spectrum of toxicity.

    Nicola Y Leung;Ian M Whyte;Ian M Whyte;Geoffrey K Isbister;Geoffrey K Isbister

Frequent Co-Authors

Nicholas A. Buckley
Nicholas A. Buckley University of Sydney
Bart J. Currie
Bart J. Currie Charles Darwin University
Michael S. Roberts
Michael S. Roberts University of Queensland
Richard C. Russell
Richard C. Russell University of Sydney
David A. Warrell
David A. Warrell University of Oxford
Matthew C. Kiernan
Matthew C. Kiernan Royal Prince Alfred Hospital
David N. Juurlink
David N. Juurlink University of Toronto
John N. A. Hooper
John N. A. Hooper Griffith University
Mark A. Baker
Mark A. Baker University of Newcastle Australia
Michael Eddleston
Michael Eddleston University of Edinburgh

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a medical career in the USA doesn’t just mean attending traditional medical school. There are a variety of flexible and accredited online degrees that can launch or elevate your journey in healthcare. For nurses, rn to np bridge programs offer an accessible route to becoming a nurse practitioner, allowing RNs to advance their skills and scope of practice without putting their career on hold.

Nutrition plays a vital role in preventative medicine and wellness. If you’re interested in helping others improve their health through diet, consider an online degree in nutrition. This pathway provides a strong foundation for careers in clinical nutrition, public health, and wellness coaching.

Those aiming for leadership roles in healthcare administration may benefit from enrolling in top online mha programs that are cahme accredited. Accreditation ensures you receive quality training that meets industry standards.

For registered nurses seeking career advancement without meeting in-person requirements, there are reputable rn to bsn online programs without clinicals. These degrees can boost your qualifications and open new professional doors.

Best Scientists Citing Geoffrey K. Isbister

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles