World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
39
Citations
7215
World Ranking
9682
National Ranking
382

Peter van Beek publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter van Beek sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 129 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Peter van Beek D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter van Beek sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter van Beek is affiliated with the University of Waterloo in Canada and contributes to fields spanning Computer Science and Engineering. Their research focuses on areas including Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, and Management Science and Operations Research.

Their work covers several main topics of study such as Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference, CCD and CMOS Imaging Sensors, Advanced Neural Network Applications, Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection, Data Quality and Management, Machine Learning and Data Classification, and Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques.

Van Beek has published research in various venues, notably Electronic Imaging and arXiv (Cornell University), with a balanced output in both journals and preprint archives. Recent papers include:

  • Boosting computer vision performance by enhancing camera ISP, 2021, Electronic Imaging
  • A Score-and-Search Approach to Learning Bayesian Networks with Noisy-OR Relations, 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Evaluation of semi-frozen semi-fixed neural network for efficient computer vision inference, 2021, Electronic Imaging
  • Learning All Credible Bayesian Network Structures for Model Averaging, 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Scalable Bayesian Network Structure Learning with Splines, 2021, arXiv (Cornell University)

Frequent coauthors collaborating with van Beek include Chyuan-Tyng Wu, Charupriya Sharma, Thomas R. Gardos, Zhenyu A. Liao, and James Cussens.

The research interests span across diverse topics related to computational models, camera imaging systems, and neural networks, often intersecting machine learning techniques with industrial applications such as vision systems and defect detection. The emphasis on Bayesian networks and causal inference signifies a strong focus on probabilistic models and data-driven decision-making frameworks within their body of work.

Best Publications

  • Handbook of Constraint Programming

    Francesca Rossi;Peter van Beek;Toby Walsh

  • Constraint propagation algorithms for temporal reasoning: a revised report

    Marc Vilain;Henry Kautz;Peter van Beek

  • Reasoning about qualitative temporal information

    Peter van Beek

  • Reasoning about qualitative temporal information

    Peter van Beek

  • Handbook of Constraint Programming (Foundations of Artificial Intelligence)

    Francesca Rossi;Peter van Beek;Toby Walsh

  • A theoretical evaluation of selected backtracking algorithms

    Grzegorz Kondrak;Peter van Beek

  • Exact and approximate reasoning about temporal relations

    Peter van Beek;Peter van Beek;Robin Cohen

  • CPlan: a constraint programming approach to planning

    Peter van Beek;Xinguang Chen

  • On the Conversion between Non-Binary and Binary Constraint Satisfaction Problems

    Fahiem Bacchus;Peter van Beek

  • Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming - CP 2005

    Peter van Beek

  • The design and experimental analysis of algorithms for temporal reasoning

    Peter van Beek;Dennis W. Manchak

  • Backtracking Search Algorithms

    Peter van Beek

  • Approximation algorithms for temporal reasoning

    Peter Van Beek

  • A fast and simple algorithm for bounds consistency of the all different constraint

    Alejandro Lopez-Ortiz;Claude-Guy Quimper;John Tromp;Peter Van Beek

  • On the minimality and global consistency of row-convex constraint networks

    Peter van Beek;Rina Dechter

  • Metadata-driven multimedia access

    P. van Beek;J.R. Smith;T. Ebrahimi;T. Suzuki

  • Local and global relational consistency

    Rina Dechter;Peter van Beek

  • Conflict-directed backjumping revisited

    Xinguang Chen;Peter van Beek

  • On the minimality and decomposability of constraint networks

    Peter van Beek

  • Binary vs. non-binary constraints

    Fahiem Bacchus;Xinguang Chen;Peter van Beek;Toby Walsh

  • Hierarchical 2-D mesh representation, tracking, and compression for object-based video

    P. van Beek;A.M. Tekalp;N. Zhuang;I. Celasun

  • Two-dimensional mesh-based visual-object representation for interactive synthetic/natural digital video

    A.M. Tekalp;P. Van Beek;C. Toklu;B. Gunsel

  • On the conversion between non-binary constraint satisfaction problems

    Fahiem Bacchus;Peter van Beek

Frequent Co-Authors

Robin Cohen
Robin Cohen University of Waterloo
Toby Walsh
Toby Walsh University of New South Wales
Rina Dechter
Rina Dechter University of California, Irvine
Pascal Poupart
Pascal Poupart University of Waterloo
Fahiem Bacchus
Fahiem Bacchus University of Toronto
Henry Kautz
Henry Kautz University of Virginia
Francesca Rossi
Francesca Rossi University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli"
Krzysztof Czarnecki
Krzysztof Czarnecki University of Waterloo
Otman A. Basir
Otman A. Basir University of Waterloo
Francesca Rossi
Francesca Rossi IBM (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens doors to a variety of related online degrees and career opportunities. For those ready to fast-track their learning, an accelerated computer science degree online offers a streamlined path to graduation and workforce entry. These programs cater to ambitious students looking to move quickly into tech careers.

Diverse specializations are also possible. Interested in sustainability and technology integration? Accredited environmental engineering degrees online blend environmental problem-solving with engineering principles, positioning graduates for green-energy and conservation careers.

For an edge in the engineering sector, pursuing the cheapest online master’s mechanical engineering programs allows you to upskill without incurring excessive debt. These degrees can expand your expertise in areas such as robotics, manufacturing, and design.

If you’re drawn to scientific research or analytical roles, consider online physics degrees. These programs offer flexibility while laying the groundwork for careers in research, data analysis, or advanced studies.

Whether focusing on computer science or branching into related STEM pathways, online degree programs make quality education more accessible, affordable, and adaptable to your goals.

Best Scientists Citing Peter van Beek

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles