World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
42
Citations
7267
World Ranking
8404
National Ranking
506

Peter Jeavons publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Jeavons sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 132 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Peter Jeavons D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Jeavons sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter Jeavons is affiliated with the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple fields, primarily focusing on Computer Science with additional work in Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology.

The main subfields of study in their work include:

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Genetics
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics
  • Computer Networks and Communications

The topics covered by their research are diverse, with particular emphasis on:

  • Evolutionary Algorithms and Applications
  • Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithms Research
  • Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
  • Constraint Satisfaction and Optimization
  • Advanced Graph Theory Research
  • Advanced Algebra and Logic

Peter Jeavons has contributed papers to several publication venues. Notably, their recent works appear in:

  • Zygon®, 2022
  • Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2020

Their recent papers include:

  • THE DESIGN OF EVOLUTIONARY ALGORITHMS: A COMPUTER SCIENCE PERSPECTIVE ON THE COMPATIBILITY OF EVOLUTION AND DESIGN (2022) published in Zygon®
  • Representing Fitness Landscapes by Valued Constraints to Understand the Complexity of Local Search (2020) published in Lecture Notes in Computer Science

Frequent collaborators in their research include:

  • David A. Cohen
  • Artem Kaznatcheev
  • Martin Cooper
  • Stanislav Živný

Best Publications

  • Classifying the Complexity of Constraints Using Finite Algebras

    Andrei Bulatov;Peter Jeavons;Andrei Krokhin

  • Closure properties of constraints

    Peter Jeavons;David Cohen;Marc Gyssens

  • On the algebraic structure of combinatorial problems

    Peter Jeavons

  • Constraints, consistency and closure

    Peter Jeavons;David Cohen;Martin C. Cooper

  • Decomposing constraint satisfaction problems using database techniques

    Marc Gyssens;Peter G. Jeavons;David A. Cohen

  • Tractable constraints on ordered domains

    Peter G. Jeavons;Martin C. Cooper

  • The 2019 mathematical oncology roadmap.

    Russell C Rockne;Andrea Hawkins-Daarud;Kristin R Swanson;Kristin R Swanson;James P Sluka;James P Sluka

  • Constraint Satisfaction Problems and Finite Algebras

    Andrei A. Bulatov;Andrei A. Krokhin;Peter Jeavons

  • Reasoning about temporal relations: The tractable subalgebras of Allen's interval algebra

    Andrei Krokhin;Peter Jeavons;Peter Jonsson

  • Symmetry Definitions for Constraint Satisfaction Problems

    David Cohen;Peter Jeavons;Christopher Jefferson;Karen E. Petrie

  • Characterising tractable constraints

    Martin C. Cooper;David A. Cohen;Peter G. Jeavons

  • Antibiotic collateral sensitivity is contingent on the repeatability of evolution

    Daniel Nichol;Daniel Nichol;Joseph Rutter;Christopher Bryant;Andrea M. Hujer;Andrea M. Hujer

  • Steering Evolution with Sequential Therapy to Prevent the Emergence of Bacterial Antibiotic Resistance

    Daniel Nichol;Peter Jeavons;Alexander G. Fletcher;Robert A. Bonomo

  • The complexity of soft constraint satisfaction

    David A. Cohen;Martin C. Cooper;Peter G. Jeavons;Andrei A. Krokhin

  • A Survey of Tractable Constraint Satisfaction Problems

    Peter Jeavons

  • The Complexity of Constraint Languages

    David A. Cohen;Peter Jeavons

  • Algebraic structures in combinatorial problems

    Peter Jeavons

  • The complexity of maximal constraint languages

    Andrei Bulatov;Andrei Krokhin;Peter Jeavons

  • A stochastic neural architecture that exploits dynamically reconfigurable FPGAs

    M. van Daalen;P. Jeavons;J. Shawe-Taylor

  • Building tractable disjunctive constraints

    David Cohen;Peter Jeavons;Peter Jonsson;Manolis Koubarakis

Frequent Co-Authors

Alexander R. A. Anderson
Alexander R. A. Anderson Moffitt Cancer Center
John Shawe-Taylor
John Shawe-Taylor University College London
Philip K. Maini
Philip K. Maini University of Oxford
Manolis Koubarakis
Manolis Koubarakis National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
Andrea M. Hujer
Andrea M. Hujer United States Department of Veterans Affairs
Georg Gottlob
Georg Gottlob University of Calabria
Robert A. Gatenby
Robert A. Gatenby Moffitt Cancer Center
Gurdyal S. Besra
Gurdyal S. Besra University of Birmingham
Richard Mott
Richard Mott University College London
Jonathan Flint
Jonathan Flint University of California, Los Angeles

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering studying Computer Science in the USA, it’s important to explore related online degrees and flexible career pathways. Today’s digital world offers many accelerated and affordable options for advancing your education and boosting your career potential.

Many professionals are looking for the cheapest MBA online programs to gain valuable business and leadership skills without high costs. MBA degrees can complement your technical background and open doors to roles in management and technology consulting.

If you want to advance fast, consider enrolling in 1 year online masters programs, which allow you to complete your graduate degree quickly. There are also many fast degrees online for those who want to enter the workforce rapidly with strong earning potential.

For those focused on cutting-edge fields like artificial intelligence, the availability of the best ai masters programs online means you can specialize affordably and flexibly. Choosing the right path will depend on your career goals and the pace at which you want to learn.

Best Scientists Citing Peter Jeavons

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles