World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Matthew F. S. Rushworth

Matthew F. S. Rushworth

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
118
Citations
56889
World Ranking
405
National Ranking
52

Matthew F. S. Rushworth publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew F. S. Rushworth sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 263 publications — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Matthew F. S. Rushworth D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew F. S. Rushworth sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 118 D-Index — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2019 - Fellow of the Royal Society, United Kingdom

Overview

Matthew F. S. Rushworth is affiliated with the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on the field of neuroscience with a strong emphasis on cognitive neuroscience. The scientist's work spans several subfields, including cognitive neuroscience, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, social psychology, cellular and molecular neuroscience, and experimental and cognitive psychology.

The topics covered in their research are diverse. Key areas include neural dynamics and brain function, neural and behavioral psychology studies, functional brain connectivity studies, memory and neural mechanisms, advanced neuroimaging techniques and applications, EEG and brain-computer interfaces, and decision-making and behavioral economics.

Some notable recent papers authored or co-authored by Matthew F. S. Rushworth include:

  • Medial and orbital frontal cortex in decision-making and flexible behavior, 2022, Neuron
  • Activation and disruption of a neural mechanism for novel choice in monkeys, 2021, Nature
  • Global reward state affects learning and activity in raphe nucleus and anterior insula in monkeys, 2020, Nature Communications
  • Combining brain perturbation and neuroimaging in non-human primates, 2021, NeuroImage
  • A Common Space Approach to Comparative Neuroscience, 2021, Annual Review of Neuroscience

The scientist frequently publishes in a range of academic venues. These include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Nature Communications
  • Neuron
  • eLife
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Collaborations are a vital aspect of their research network. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Miriam C. Klein-Flügge
  • Nima Khalighinejad
  • Jérôme Sallet
  • Lennart Verhagen
  • Luke Priestley

In 2019, Matthew F. S. Rushworth was recognized as a Fellow of the Royal Society in the United Kingdom.

Best Publications

  • Probabilistic diffusion tractography with multiple fibre orientations: What can we gain?

    Behrens Tej.;H J Berg;S Jbabdi;Rushworth Mfs.

  • Learning the value of information in an uncertain world

    Timothy E J Behrens;Mark W Woolrich;Mark E Walton;Matthew F S Rushworth;Matthew F S Rushworth

  • Frontal cortex and reward-guided learning and decision-making.

    Matthew F.S. Rushworth;Matthew F.S. Rushworth;MaryAnn P. Noonan;MaryAnn P. Noonan;Erie D. Boorman;Erie D. Boorman;Erie D. Boorman;Mark E. Walton;Mark E. Walton

  • Action sets and decisions in the medial frontal cortex

    M.F.S. Rushworth;M.F.S. Rushworth;M.E. Walton;S.W. Kennerley;D.M. Bannerman

  • Optimal decision making and the anterior cingulate cortex.

    Steven W Kennerley;Mark E Walton;Timothy E J Behrens;Timothy E J Behrens;Mark J Buckley

  • Associative learning of social value

    Timothy E. J. Behrens;Laurence T. Hunt;Laurence T. Hunt;Mark W. Woolrich;Matthew F. S. Rushworth;Matthew F. S. Rushworth

  • Choice, uncertainty and value in prefrontal and cingulate cortex

    Matthew F S Rushworth;Timothy E J Behrens

  • The role of ipsilateral premotor cortex in hand movement after stroke

    Heidi Johansen-Berg;Matthew F. S. Rushworth;Marko D. Bogdanovic;Udo Kischka

  • Connectivity-Based Parcellation of Human Cingulate Cortex and Its Relation to Functional Specialization

    Matthias Beckmann;Heidi Johansen-Berg;Matthew F. S. Rushworth

  • On the relationship between the "default mode network" and the "social brain".

    Rogier B. Mars;Rogier B. Mars;Rogier B. Mars;Franz-Xaver Neubert;MaryAnn P. Noonan;MaryAnn P. Noonan;Jerome Sallet;Jerome Sallet

  • Changes in connectivity profiles define functionally-distinct regions in human medial frontal cortex

    H. Johansen-Berg;T. E. J. Behrens;M. D. Robson;I. Drobnjak

  • How Green Is the Grass on the Other Side? Frontopolar Cortex and the Evidence in Favor of Alternative Courses of Action

    Erie D. Boorman;Timothy E.J. Behrens;Mark W. Woolrich;Matthew F.S. Rushworth

  • Separate neural pathways process different decision costs

    Peter H Rudebeck;Mark E Walton;Angharad N Smyth;David M Bannerman

  • Neural mechanisms of foraging.

    Nils Kolling;Timothy E. J. Behrens;Rogier B. Mars;Matthew F. S. Rushworth

  • Semantic Processing in the Left Inferior Prefrontal Cortex: A Combined Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Study

    Joseph T. Devlin;Paul M. Matthews;Matthew F. S. Rushworth

  • Effort-Based Cost–Benefit Valuation and the Human Brain

    Paula L Croxson;Mark E Walton;Jill X O'Reilly;Timothy E J Behrens

  • Anatomical connectivity of the subgenual cingulate region targeted with deep brain stimulation for treatment-resistant depression.

    H. Johansen-Berg;D. A. Gutman;T. E. J. Behrens;P. M. Matthews;P. M. Matthews;P. M. Matthews

  • Functional Specialization within Medial Frontal Cortex of the Anterior Cingulate for Evaluating Effort-Related Decisions

    Mark E. Walton;David M. Bannerman;Karin Alterescu;Matthew F. S. Rushworth

  • Role of the Human Medial Frontal Cortex in Task Switching: A Combined fMRI and TMS Study

    M.F.S. Rushworth;K. A. Hadland;T. Paus;P. K. Sipila

  • Contrasting roles for cingulate and orbitofrontal cortex in decisions and social behaviour

    M.F.S. Rushworth;T.E.J. Behrens;T.E.J. Behrens;P.H. Rudebeck;M.E. Walton

  • Neuroeconomics: Decision Making and the Brain

    Matthew F.S. Rushworth;Mark E. Walton

Frequent Co-Authors

Rogier B. Mars
Rogier B. Mars University of Oxford
Jerome Sallet
Jerome Sallet University of Oxford
Timothy E.J. Behrens
Timothy E.J. Behrens University of Oxford
Mark E. Walton
Mark E. Walton University of Oxford
Lennart Verhagen
Lennart Verhagen Radboud University
Richard E. Passingham
Richard E. Passingham University of Oxford
Heidi Johansen-Berg
Heidi Johansen-Berg University of Oxford
David M. Bannerman
David M. Bannerman University of Oxford
Anna C. Nobre
Anna C. Nobre Yale University
Peter H. Rudebeck
Peter H. Rudebeck Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience in the USA can open doors to a wide variety of related online degrees and career pathways in behavioral health, research, and clinical support roles. Many students consider interdisciplinary options to broaden their skills and employment opportunities.

If budget is a top concern, you may want to explore programs like an online psychology degree cheap, which offers flexibility and can set a strong foundation for graduate study in neuroscience, therapy, or counseling.

For those interested in social work and mental health, you could consider enrolling in the easiest msw program for an accessible path to entering the field and making a difference in community health.

Aspiring clinical psychologists might investigate the best options for an online psy d program, where you can pursue advanced practice and clinical licensure entirely online. Alternatively, if your interests lean towards marriage and family therapy, discover the mft online options that offer streamlined pathways for becoming a qualified therapist.

Exploring these related degrees can help tailor your academic journey and carve out a rewarding career in the expanding field of neuroscience and mental health.

Best Scientists Citing Matthew F. S. Rushworth

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles