World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
36
Citations
8543
World Ranking
8909
National Ranking
3768

Peter H. Rudebeck publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter H. Rudebeck sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 76 publications — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Peter H. Rudebeck D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter H. Rudebeck sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter H. Rudebeck is affiliated with the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai in the United States. Their research predominantly focuses on the field of Neuroscience, with a substantial number of publications in Cognitive Neuroscience as a key subfield. Other subfields include Psychiatry and Mental Health, Social Psychology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, and Neurology.

Their work covers multiple research topics, notably:

  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Peter H. Rudebeck has contributed to a range of publications in several academic venues. Frequent publication venues include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Journal of Neuroscience
  • Neuron
  • Neuropsychopharmacology
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Their notable recent papers include:

  • Foraging with the frontal cortex: A cross-species evaluation of reward-guided behavior, 2021, Neuropsychopharmacology
  • Post-error recruitment of frontal sensory cortical projections promotes attention in mice, 2021, Neuron
  • Inferring brain-wide interactions using data-constrained recurrent neural network models, 2020, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Animal models of human mood, 2020, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
  • Resting-State fMRI-Based Screening of Deschloroclozapine in Rhesus Macaques Predicts Dosage-Dependent Behavioral Effects, 2022, Journal of Neuroscience

The scientist frequently collaborates with several colleagues, including:

  • Atsushi Fujimoto
  • Frederic M. Stoll
  • Brian E. Russ
  • Catherine Elorette
  • S Hashimoto

Best Publications

  • Separate neural pathways process different decision costs

    Peter H Rudebeck;Mark E Walton;Angharad N Smyth;David M Bannerman

  • The neural basis of reversal learning: An updated perspective.

    Alicia Izquierdo;Jonathan L. Brigman;Anna K. Radke;Peter H. Rudebeck

  • Orbitofrontal cortex

    Unknown

  • Contrasting roles for cingulate and orbitofrontal cortex in decisions and social behaviour

    M.F.S. Rushworth;T.E.J. Behrens;T.E.J. Behrens;P.H. Rudebeck;M.E. Walton

  • Separable Learning Systems in the Macaque Brain and the Role of Orbitofrontal Cortex in Contingent Learning

    Mark E. Walton;Timothy E.J. Behrens;Mark J. Buckley;Peter H. Rudebeck

  • The Orbitofrontal Oracle: Cortical Mechanisms for the Prediction and Evaluation of Specific Behavioral Outcomes

    Peter H. Rudebeck;Elisabeth A. Murray

  • Frontal Cortex Subregions Play Distinct Roles in Choices between Actions and Stimuli

    Peter H. Rudebeck;Timothy E. Behrens;Steven W. Kennerley;Mark G. Baxter

  • Prefrontal mechanisms of behavioral flexibility, emotion regulation and value updating

    Peter H Rudebeck;Richard C Saunders;Anna T Prescott;Lily S Chau

  • A role for the macaque anterior cingulate gyrus in social valuation.

    P. H. Rudebeck;M. J. Buckley;M. E. Walton;M. F. S. Rushworth

  • The Evolution of Prefrontal Inputs to the Cortico-pontine System: Diffusion Imaging Evidence from Macaque Monkeys and Humans

    Narender Ramnani;Timothy E.J. Behrens;Heidi Johansen-Berg;Marlene C. Richter

  • Dissociable Effects of Subtotal Lesions within the Macaque Orbital Prefrontal Cortex on Reward-Guided Behavior

    Peter H. Rudebeck;Elisabeth A. Murray

  • The contribution of distinct subregions of the ventromedial frontal cortex to emotion, social behavior, and decision making.

    P. H. Rudebeck;D. M. Bannerman;M. F. S. Rushworth

  • Amygdala and Orbitofrontal Cortex Lesions Differentially Influence Choices during Object Reversal Learning

    Peter H. Rudebeck;Elisabeth A. Murray

  • Specialized Representations of Value in the Orbital and Ventrolateral Prefrontal Cortex: Desirability versus Availability of Outcomes

    Peter H. Rudebeck;Richard C. Saunders;Dawn A. Lundgren;Elisabeth A. Murray

  • Effects of Amygdala Lesions on Reward-Value Coding in Orbital and Medial Prefrontal Cortex

    Peter H. Rudebeck;Andrew R. Mitz;Ravi V. Chacko;Elisabeth A. Murray

  • Specializations for reward-guided decision-making in the primate ventral prefrontal cortex.

    Elisabeth A. Murray;Peter H. Rudebeck

  • A role for primate subgenual cingulate cortex in sustaining autonomic arousal

    Peter H. Rudebeck;Philip T. Putnam;Teresa E. Daniels;Tianming Yang

  • Distinct contributions of frontal areas to emotion and social behaviour in the rat

    Peter H. Rudebeck;Mark E. Walton;Benjamin H. P. Millette;Elizabeth Shirley

  • Impulsive choice in hippocampal but not orbitofrontal cortex-lesioned rats on a nonspatial decision-making maze task

    T. Y. Mariano;D. M. Bannerman;S. B. McHugh;T. J. Preston

  • More than Meets the Eye: the Relationship between Pupil Size and Locus Coeruleus Activity.

    Vincent D. Costa;Peter H. Rudebeck

  • Balkanizing the primate orbitofrontal cortex: Distinct subregions for comparing and contrasting values

    Peter H. Rudebeck;Elisabeth A. Murray

Frequent Co-Authors

Elisabeth A. Murray
Elisabeth A. Murray National Institutes of Health
Matthew F. S. Rushworth
Matthew F. S. Rushworth University of Oxford
Mark G. Baxter
Mark G. Baxter Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Mark E. Walton
Mark E. Walton University of Oxford
David M. Bannerman
David M. Bannerman University of Oxford
Timothy E.J. Behrens
Timothy E.J. Behrens University of Oxford
Mark J. Buckley
Mark J. Buckley University of Oxford
Bruno B. Averbeck
Bruno B. Averbeck National Institutes of Health
Jerome Sallet
Jerome Sallet University of Oxford
Ueli Rutishauser
Ueli Rutishauser Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience online opens the door to flexible learning and new career possibilities. Many students are now seeking accelerated degrees online to fast-track their education and enter the workforce sooner. These programs are ideal for self-motivated learners who want to complete their neuroscience studies at a quicker pace.

When considering a neuroscience degree or related fields, it's important to explore your future earning potential. STEM programs, including neuroscience, are considered among the most valuable degree in the world, offering strong career prospects and high salaries. Additionally, there are fun majors in college that pay well, which can pair well with neuroscience for a rewarding career journey.

Affordability is a key concern. Many colleges online that accept fafsa offer financial aid options, making it easier to manage tuition costs for your neuroscience studies. By choosing an accredited, affordable online program, students can balance academic goals and financial needs.

Best Scientists Citing Peter H. Rudebeck

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles