World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Janice E. K. Cooke

Janice E. K. Cooke

D-Index & Metrics

Plant Science and Agronomy

D-Index
38
Citations
5312
World Ranking
4411
National Ranking
187

Janice E. K. Cooke publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Janice E. K. Cooke sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36 publications 467+

This scientist: 74 publications — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

Janice E. K. Cooke D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Janice E. K. Cooke sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • The dynamic nature of bud dormancy in trees: environmental control and molecular mechanisms.

    Janice E. K. Cooke;Maria E. Eriksson;Maria E. Eriksson;Olavi Junttila

  • Nitrogen storage and seasonal nitrogen cycling in Populus: bridging molecular physiology and ecophysiology

    Janice E. K. Cooke;Janice E. K. Cooke;Martin Weih

  • Involvement of Pinus taeda MYB1 and MYB8 in phenylpropanoid metabolism and secondary cell wall biogenesis: a comparative in planta analysis.

    Claude Bomal;Frank Bedon;Frank Bedon;Sébastien Caron;Shawn D. Mansfield

  • A White Spruce Gene Catalog for Conifer Genome Analyses

    Philippe Rigault;Brian Boyle;Pierre Lepage;Janice E.K. Cooke

  • Short‐term physiological and developmental responses to nitrogen availability in hybrid poplar

    Janice E. K. Cooke;Janice E. K. Cooke;Timothy A. Martin;John M. Davis

  • Influence of nitrogen fertilization on xylem traits and aquaporin expression in stems of hybrid poplar

    Uwe G. Hacke;Lenka Plavcová;Adriana Almeida-Rodriguez;Susanne King-Jones

  • Pathogen challenge, salicylic acid, and jasmonic acid regulate expression of chitinase gene homologs in pine.

    John M. Davis;Haiguo Wu;Janice E. K. Cooke;Jon M. Reed

  • Functional characterization of drought-responsive aquaporins in Populus balsamifera and Populus simonii×balsamifera clones with different drought resistance strategies.

    Adriana M. Almeida-Rodriguez;Janice E.K. Cooke;Francis Yeh;Janusz J. Zwiazek

  • Multilocus species identification and fungal DNA barcoding: insights from blue stain fungal symbionts of the mountain pine beetle.

    Amanda D. Roe;Adrianne V. Rice;Sean E. Bromilow;Janice E. K. Cooke

  • Advances in ecological genomics in forest trees and applications to genetic resources conservation and breeding.

    Jason A. Holliday;Sally N. Aitken;Janice E. K. Cooke;Bruno Fady

  • Generation, annotation, analysis and database integration of 16,500 white spruce EST clusters

    Nathalie Pavy;Charles Paule;Lee S Parsons;John A. Crow

  • Short-term effects of nitrogen availability on wood formation and fibre properties in hybrid poplar

    Frederic E. Pitre;Janice E. K. Cooke;Janice E. K. Cooke;John J. Mackay

  • Molecular events of apical bud formation in white spruce, Picea glauca.

    Walid El Kayal;Carmen C. G. Allen;Chelsea J.-T. Ju;Eri Adams

  • Identification of conserved core xylem gene sets: conifer cDNA microarray development, transcript profiling and computational analyses.

    Nathalie Pavy;Brian Boyle;Colleen Nelson;Charles Paule

  • Development of high-density SNP genotyping arrays for white spruce (Picea glauca) and transferability to subtropical and nordic congeners.

    Nathalie Pavy;Philippe Rigault;Sylvie Blais

  • Gene expression associated with N‐induced shifts in resource allocation in poplar

    J. E. K. Cooke;K. A. Brown;R. Wu;J. M. Davis

  • How the Mountain Pine Beetle (Dendroctonus ponderosae) Breached the Canadian Rocky Mountains

    Jasmine K. Janes;Yisu Li;Christopher I. Keeling;Macaire M.S. Yuen

  • Aquaporin gene expression and apoplastic water flow in bur oak (Quercus macrocarpa) leaves in relation to the light response of leaf hydraulic conductance

    Mihaela C. Voicu;Janice E. K. Cooke;Janusz J. Zwiazek

  • Transcriptome resources and functional characterization of monoterpene synthases for two host species of the mountain pine beetle, lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta) and jack pine (Pinus banksiana)

    Dawn E Hall;Macaire M S Yuen;Sharon Jancsik;Alfonso Lara Quesada

  • Characterizing the physical and genetic structure of the lodgepole pine × jack pine hybrid zone: mosaic structure and differential introgression

    Catherine I. Cullingham;Patrick M. A. James;Patrick M. A. James;Janice E. K. Cooke;David W. Coltman

  • Effect of Water Stress and Fungal Inoculation on Monoterpene Emission from an Historical and a New Pine Host of the Mountain Pine Beetle

    Inka Lusebrink;Maya L. Evenden;F. Guillaume Blanchet;Janice E. K. Cooke

  • Comparative phylogeography, genetic differentiation and contrasting reproductive modes in three fungal symbionts of a multipartite bark beetle symbiosis.

    Amanda D. Roe;Adrianne V. Rice;David W. Coltman;Janice E. K. Cooke

  • Trees of the people: the growing science of poplars in Canada and worldwideThis commentary is one of a selection of papers published in the Special Issue on Poplar Research in Canada.

    Janice E.K. CookeJ.E. Cooke;Janice E.K. CookeJ.E. Cooke;Stewart B. RoodS.B. Rood;Stewart B. RoodS.B. Rood

  • Spatial Community Structure of Mountain Pine Beetle Fungal Symbionts Across a Latitudinal Gradient

    Amanda D. Roe;Patrick M. A. James;Adrianne V. Rice;Janice E. K. Cooke

  • Gene family structure, expression and functional analysis of HD-Zip III genes in angiosperm and gymnosperm forest trees

    Caroline L Côté;Francis Boileau;Vicky Roy;Mario Ouellet

  • Genetic and genomic evidence of niche partitioning and adaptive radiation in mountain pine beetle fungal symbionts.

    Dario I. Ojeda Alayon;Clement K. M. Tsui;Nicolas Feau;Arnaud Capron

  • Plant dormancy research: from environmental control to molecular regulatory networks.

    Hisayo Yamane;Anil Kumar Singh;Janice E K Cooke

  • Cross-species outlier detection reveals different evolutionary pressures between sister species

    Catherine I. Cullingham;Janice E. K. Cooke;David W. Coltman

  • Trees of the people: the growing science of poplars in Canada and worldwide1

    Janice E.K. Cooke;Stewart B. Rood

  • A novel application of RNase H2-dependent quantitative PCR for detection and quantification of Grosmannia clavigera, a mountain pine beetle fungal symbiont, in environmental samples.

    Chandra H McAllister;Colleen E Fortier;Kate R St Onge;Bianca M Sacchi

  • Comparative genomics of the chitinase gene family in lodgepole and jack pines: contrasting responses to biotic threats and landscape level investigation of genetic differentiation

    Rhiannon M. Peery;Chandra H. McAllister;Catherine I. Cullingham;Elizabeth L. Mahon

  • From the inside out: fungal endophyte–grass associations and grassland communities

    Janice E. K. Cooke

  • Branching out: a new era of investigating physiological processes in forest trees using genomic tools.

    Chung-Jui Tsai;Scott A Harding;Janice E K Cooke

  • Influence of water deficit on the induced and constitutive responses of pines to infection by mountain pine beetle fungal associates

    Adriana Arango-Velez;Miranda Meents;Jean Linsky;Walid El Kayal

Frequent Co-Authors

David W. Coltman
David W. Coltman University of Western Ontario
John MacKay
John MacKay University of Oxford
Janusz J. Zwiazek
Janusz J. Zwiazek University of Alberta
Felix A. H. Sperling
Felix A. H. Sperling University of Alberta
Richard C. Hamelin
Richard C. Hamelin University of British Columbia
Jean Bousquet
Jean Bousquet Université Laval
Jean Beaulieu
Jean Beaulieu Université Laval
Armand Séguin
Armand Séguin Natural Resources Canada
Stewart B. Rood
Stewart B. Rood University of Lethbridge
Karen E. Mock
Karen E. Mock Utah State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Janice E. K. Cooke

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles