World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Plant Science and Agronomy
Canada
2025

Jörg Bohlmann publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jörg Bohlmann between 1997 and 2023, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jörg Bohlmann published across 27 years, from 1997 to 2023, averaging 10.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 28 publications in 2013. 4 of the 278 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1997 to 2023. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 28. Peak 28 publications in 2013. 1997: 1 publication 1998: 3 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 3 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 13 publications 2005: 10 publications 2006: 19 publications 2007: 16 publications 2008: 11 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 14 publications 2011: 21 publications 2012: 18 publications 2013: 28 publications 2014: 17 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 17 publications 2020: 13 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 3 publications
1997 2023

278 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jörg Bohlmann: publications per year, 1997 to 2023
Year Publications
1997 1
1998 3
1999 1
2000 3
2001 0
2002 4
2003 6
2004 13
2005 10
2006 19
2007 16
2008 11
2009 11
2010 14
2011 21
2012 18
2013 28
2014 17
2015 11
2016 11
2017 12
2018 10
2019 17
2020 13
2021 4
2022 1
2023 3
Total 278
Download as CSV

Jörg Bohlmann publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jörg Bohlmann sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 467+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 255. Most scientists, 255, have 111–115 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more. 36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36–40 publications 467+

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists
36–40 2
41–45 7
46–50 40
51–55 58
56–60 60
61–65 107
66–70 130
71–75 153
76–80 191
81–85 199
86–90 206
91–95 218
96–100 226
101–105 227
106–110 247
111–115 255
116–120 253
121–125 233
126–130 219
131–135 201
136–140 194
141–145 176
146–150 157
151–155 147
156–160 151
161–165 159
166–170 137
171–175 128
176–180 126
181–185 98
186–190 114
191–195 100
196–200 90
201–205 71
206–210 98
211–215 70
216–220 86
221–225 61
226–230 58
231–235 53
236–240 64
241–245 39
246–250 46
251–255 51
256–260 36
261–265 44
266–270 35
271–275 30
276–280 33
281–285 35
286–290 36
291–295 26
296–300 26
301–305 31
306–310 30
311–315 21
316–320 29
321–325 14
326–330 15
331–335 15
336–340 17
341–345 15
346–350 12
351–355 17
356–360 18
361–365 12
366–370 11
371–375 6
376–380 6
381–385 11
386–390 9
391–395 10
396–400 8
401–405 4
406–410 9
411–415 11
416–420 4
421–425 7
426–430 4
431–435 3
436–440 5
441–445 8
446–450 6
451–455 7
456–460 5
461–465 6
466 2
467+ 99
Download as CSV

Jörg Bohlmann D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jörg Bohlmann sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 80 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 109+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more. 30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists
30 200
31 236
32 253
33 283
34 288
35 240
36 246
37 243
38 247
39 229
40 232
41 230
42 228
43 219
44 193
45 164
46 158
47 143
48 131
49 127
50 122
51 122
52 110
53 102
54 98
55 79
56 85
57 88
58 91
59 62
60 61
61 59
62 54
63 61
64 59
65 58
66 41
67 49
68 39
69 32
70 40
71 47
72 38
73 28
74 29
75 28
76 22
77 21
78 25
79 26
80 19
81 16
82 12
83 16
84 14
85 11
86 17
87 13
88 10
89 12
90 18
91 16
92 16
93 17
94 12
95 8
96 9
97 9
98 11
99 12
100 5
101 8
102 4
103 11
104 5
105 9
106 7
107 4
108 8
109+ 99
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Plant Science and Agronomy in Canada Leader Award
  • 2015 - Fellow of the Royal Society of Canada Academy of Science
  • 2010 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Gene
  • Botany
  • Genetics

His scientific interests lie mostly in Botany, Biochemistry, Terpenoid, Complementary DNA and Monoterpene. Jörg Bohlmann has researched Botany in several fields, including Methyl jasmonate, Terpene and Pissodes strobi. His study in the fields of Photosynthesis and Non-photochemical quenching under the domain of Biochemistry overlaps with other disciplines such as Abietadiene synthase and Zeaxanthin.

His study focuses on the intersection of Terpenoid and fields such as Biosynthesis with connections in the field of Oleoresin, Diterpene and Cyclase. His Complementary DNA study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Sesquiterpene, Gene expression, ATP synthase and Populus trichocarpa. As part of the same scientific family, Jörg Bohlmann usually focuses on Monoterpene, concentrating on Pinaceae and intersecting with Carene, Sex pheromone, Kairomone and Pheromone.

His most cited work include:

  • The family of terpene synthases in plants: A mid-size family of genes for specialized metabolism that is highly diversified throughout the kingdom (653 citations)
  • Genes, enzymes and chemicals of terpenoid diversity in the constitutive and induced defence of conifers against insects and pathogens. (481 citations)
  • Methyl Jasmonate Induces Traumatic Resin Ducts, Terpenoid Resin Biosynthesis, and Terpenoid Accumulation in Developing Xylem of Norway Spruce Stems (426 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Jörg Bohlmann mostly deals with Botany, Biochemistry, Terpenoid, Gene and Terpene. His Botany research includes themes of Transcriptome, Pissodes strobi, Methyl jasmonate and Gene family. His Biochemistry and ATP synthase, Diterpene, Biosynthesis, Monoterpene and Enzyme investigations all form part of his Biochemistry research activities.

He has included themes like Sesquiterpene and Sex pheromone in his Monoterpene study. His work carried out in the field of Terpenoid brings together such families of science as Synthetic biology, Oleoresin, Metabolic engineering and Sclareol. His Gene research is classified as research in Genetics.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Botany (46.63%)
  • Biochemistry (33.13%)
  • Terpenoid (25.15%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2015-2020)?

  • Botany (46.63%)
  • Biochemistry (33.13%)
  • Terpene (16.56%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His primary areas of investigation include Botany, Biochemistry, Terpene, Biosynthesis and Terpenoid. His research integrates issues of Transcriptome and Gene family in his study of Botany. His Gene family study combines topics in areas such as Computational biology and Genomics.

His work is dedicated to discovering how Terpene, Oleoresin are connected with Embryo, Histology, Herbivore and Horticulture and other disciplines. The study incorporates disciplines such as Metabolite and ATP synthase in addition to Biosynthesis. Jörg Bohlmann merges Terpenoid with Dephosphorylation in his research.

Between 2015 and 2020, his most popular works were:

  • Expanding the Landscape of Diterpene Structural Diversity through Stereochemically Controlled Combinatorial Biosynthesis. (93 citations)
  • Terpene synthases from Cannabis sativa (79 citations)
  • Terpenes in Cannabis sativa - From plant genome to humans. (55 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Gene
  • Botany
  • Enzyme

His primary areas of study are Terpene, Botany, Terpenoid, Biosynthesis and Biochemistry. He combines subjects such as Diterpene biosynthesis and Gene family with his study of Terpene. Jörg Bohlmann interconnects RNA-Seq and Plant defense against herbivory in the investigation of issues within Botany.

His Terpenoid study incorporates themes from Metabolite, Kinase and Cytochrome P450, Metabolism. His work deals with themes such as Phylogenetics, Santalum album and ATP synthase, which intersect with Biosynthesis. Many of his research projects under Biochemistry are closely connected to Dephosphorylation with Dephosphorylation, tying the diverse disciplines of science together.

Best Publications

  • The genome of black cottonwood, Populus trichocarpa (Torr. & Gray)

    G. A. Tuskan;G. A. Tuskan;S. DiFazio;S. DiFazio;S. Jansson;J. Bohlmann

  • The Norway spruce genome sequence and conifer genome evolution.

    Björn Nystedt;Nathaniel Robert Street;Anna Wetterbom;Andrea Zuccolo

  • The family of terpene synthases in plants: A mid-size family of genes for specialized metabolism that is highly diversified throughout the kingdom

    Feng Chen;Dorothea Tholl;Jörg Bohlmann;Eran Pichersky

  • Genes, enzymes and chemicals of terpenoid diversity in the constitutive and induced defence of conifers against insects and pathogens.

    Christopher I. Keeling;Jörg Bohlmann

  • Methyl Jasmonate Induces Traumatic Resin Ducts, Terpenoid Resin Biosynthesis, and Terpenoid Accumulation in Developing Xylem of Norway Spruce Stems

    Diane Martin;Dorothea Tholl;Jonathan Gershenzon;Jörg Bohlmann

  • Terpenoid biomaterials

    Jörg Bohlmann;Christopher I. Keeling

  • Sesquiterpene synthases from grand fir (Abies grandis). Comparison of constitutive and wound-induced activities, and cDNA isolation, characterization, and bacterial expression of delta-selinene synthase and gamma-humulene synthase.

    Christopher L. Steele;John Crock;Jörg Bohlmann;Rodney Croteau

  • Induction of volatile terpene biosynthesis and diurnal emission by methyl jasmonate in foliage of Norway spruce

    Diane M. Martin;Jonathan Gershenzon;Jörg Bohlmann

  • (E)-β-Ocimene and Myrcene Synthase Genes of Floral Scent Biosynthesis in Snapdragon: Function and Expression of Three Terpene Synthase Genes of a New Terpene Synthase Subfamily

    Natalia Dudareva;Diane Martin;Christine M. Kish;Natalia Kolosova

  • Genomic analysis of the terpenoid synthase ( AtTPS) gene family of Arabidopsis thaliana.

    S. Aubourg;A. Lecharny;J. Bohlmann

  • Functional Annotation, Genome Organization and Phylogeny of the Grapevine ( Vitis vinifera ) Terpene Synthase Gene Family Based on Genome Assembly, FLcDNA Cloning, and Enzyme Assays

    Diane M. Martin;Sebastien Aubourg;Marina B Schouwey;Laurent Daviet

  • Functional Characterization of Nine Norway Spruce TPS Genes and Evolution of Gymnosperm Terpene Synthases of the TPS-d Subfamily

    Diane M. Martin;Jenny Fäldt;Jörg Bohlmann

  • Assembling the 20 Gb white spruce (Picea glauca) genome from whole-genome shotgun sequencing data

    Inanc Birol;Anthony Raymond;Shaun D. Jackman;Stephen Pleasance

  • Global transcript profiling of primary stems from Arabidopsis thaliana identifies candidate genes for missing links in lignin biosynthesis and transcriptional regulators of fiber differentiation.

    Jürgen Ehlting;Nathalie Mattheus;Dana S. Aeschliman;Eryang Li

  • Insect-Induced Conifer Defense. White Pine Weevil and Methyl Jasmonate Induce Traumatic Resinosis, de Novo Formed Volatile Emissions, and Accumulation of Terpenoid Synthase and Putative Octadecanoid Pathway Transcripts in Sitka Spruce

    Barbara Miller;Lufiani L. Madilao;Steven Ralph;Jörg Bohlmann

  • Forest tent caterpillars (Malacosoma disstria) induce local and systemic diurnal emissions of terpenoid volatiles in hybrid poplar (Populus trichocarpa x deltoides): cDNA cloning, functional characterization, and patterns of gene expression of (-)-germacrene D synthase, PtdTPS1.

    Gen-ichiro Arimura;Dezene P. W. Huber;Jörg Bohlmann

  • Efficacy of tree defense physiology varies with bark beetle population density: a basis for positive feedback in eruptive species

    Celia K. Boone;Celia K. Boone;Celia K. Boone;Brian H. Aukema;Brian H. Aukema;Brian H. Aukema;Joerg Bohlmann;Allan L. Carroll;Allan L. Carroll

  • Diterpene resin acids in conifers.

    Christopher I. Keeling;Jörg Bohlmann

  • Conifer defence against insects: microarray gene expression profiling of Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis) induced by mechanical wounding or feeding by spruce budworms (Choristoneura occidentalis) or white pine weevils (Pissodes strobi ) reveals large-scale changes of the host transcriptome

    Steven G. Ralph;Hesther Yueh;Michael Friedmann;Dana Aeschliman

  • Terpenoid biosynthesis and specialized vascular cells of conifer defense.

    Unknown

  • Pine monoterpenes and pine bark beetles: a marriage of convenience for defense and chemical communication

    Steven J. Seybold;Dezene P. W. Huber;Dezene P. W. Huber;Dezene P. W. Huber;Jana C. Lee;Jana C. Lee;Andrew D. Graves

  • The transcriptional response of hybrid poplar (Populus trichocarpa x P. deltoides) to infection by Melampsora medusae leaf rust involves induction of flavonoid pathway genes leading to the accumulation of proanthocyanidins.

    Manoela Miranda;Steven G Ralph;Robin Mellway;Rick White

  • Transgenic, non-isoprene emitting poplars don’t like it hot

    Katja Behnke;Barbara Ehlting;Markus Teuber;Martina Bauerfeind

  • Traumatic resin defense in Norway spruce (Picea abies): Methyl jasmonate-induced terpene synthase gene expression, and cDNA cloning and functional characterization of (+)-3-carene synthase

    Jenny Fäldt;Diane Martin;Barbara Miller;Suman Rawat

  • Robust simple sequence repeat markers for spruce ( Picea spp.) from expressed sequence tags

    Dainis Rungis;Yanik Bérubé;Jun Zhang;Steven Ralph

  • The genome of black cottonwood, Populus trichocarpa (Torr. & Gray) - eScholarship

    G.A. Tuskan;S. DiFazio;S. Jansson;J. Bohlmann

Frequent Co-Authors

Kermit Ritland
Kermit Ritland University of British Columbia
Steven J.M. Jones
Steven J.M. Jones University of British Columbia
Marco A. Marra
Marco A. Marra University of British Columbia
Robert A. Holt
Robert A. Holt BC Cancer Research Institute
Edward S. Buckler
Edward S. Buckler Cornell University
Bing Yang
Bing Yang University of Missouri
Inanc Birol
Inanc Birol University of British Columbia
Steven P. Briggs
Steven P. Briggs University of California, San Diego
Gen-ichiro Arimura
Gen-ichiro Arimura Tokyo University of Science
Richard A. Moore
Richard A. Moore BC Cancer Agency

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Jörg Bohlmann

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles