World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
107
Citations
44304
World Ranking
6224
National Ranking
3318

John M. Thorp publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John M. Thorp sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 599 publications — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

John M. Thorp D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John M. Thorp sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 107 D-Index — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

John M. Thorp is affiliated with the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine, with a particular concentration in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, and Obstetrics and Gynecology. Additional areas of study include Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Epidemiology, and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine.

Their work covers several main topics related to maternal and child health, including:

  • Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
  • Birth, Development, and Health
  • Gestational Diabetes Research and Management
  • Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
  • Maternal and fetal healthcare
  • Neonatal Respiratory Health Research
  • Infant Development and Preterm Care

Thorp has contributed to numerous publications, with frequent appearances in the following venues:

  • UNC Libraries
  • American Journal of Perinatology
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
  • American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

They have collaborated extensively with other researchers, often co-authoring papers with:

  • Dwight J. Rouse
  • Ronald J. Wapner
  • Michael W. Varner
  • George R. Saade
  • Yoram Sorokin

Representative recent publications by Thorp include:

  • Association of SARS-CoV-2 Infection With Serious Maternal Morbidity and Mortality From Obstetric Complications, 2022, JAMA
  • Prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in term gestations: a calculator without race and ethnicity, 2021, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Tranexamic Acid to Prevent Obstetrical Hemorrhage after Cesarean Delivery, 2023, New England Journal of Medicine
  • Race, the Vaginal Microbiome, and Spontaneous Preterm Birth, 2022, mSystems
  • Health resource utilization of labor induction versus expectant management, 2020, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Best Publications

  • A Multicenter, Randomized Trial of Treatment for Mild Gestational Diabetes

    M.B. Landon;C.Y. Spong;E. Thom;M.W. Carpenter

  • Maternal morbidity associated with multiple repeat cesarean deliveries

    Robert M. Silver;Mark B. Landon;Dwight J. Rouse;Kenneth J. Leveno

  • Prevention of recurrent preterm delivery by 17 alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate

    Paul J. Meis;Mark Klebanoff;Elizabeth Thom;Mitchell P. Dombrowski

  • Maternal and Perinatal Outcomes Associated With a Trial of Labor After Prior Cesarean Delivery

    Mark B. Landon;John C. Hauth;Kenneth J. Leveno;Catherine Y. Spong

  • Timing of Elective Repeat Cesarean Delivery at Term and Neonatal Outcomes

    Alan T N Tita;Mark B. Landon;Catherine Y. Spong;Yinglei Lai

  • Antenatal Betamethasone for Women at Risk for Late Preterm Delivery

    C. Gyamfi-Bannerman;E. A. Thom;S. C. Blackwell;A. T N Tita

  • A randomized, controlled trial of magnesium sulfate for the prevention of cerebral palsy

    Dwight J. Rouse;Deborah G. Hirtz;Elizabeth Thom;Michael W. Varner

  • Outcomes of routine episiotomy: a systematic review.

    Katherine Hartmann;Meera Viswanathan;Rachel Palmieri;Gerald Gartlehner

  • The MFMU Cesarean Registry: Factors affecting the success of trial of labor after previous cesarean delivery

    Mark B. Landon;Sharon Leindecker;Catherine Y. Spong;John C. Hauth

  • Comparison of pregnancy dating by last menstrual period, ultrasound scanning, and their combination.

    David A. Savitz;James W. Terry;Nancy Dole;John M. Thorp

  • Vitamins C and E to prevent complications of pregnancy-associated hypertension

    James M. Roberts;Leslie Myatt;Catherine Y. Spong;Elizabeth A. Thom

  • Epidemiologic characteristics of preterm delivery: etiologic heterogeneity.

    David A. Savitz;Cheryl A. Blackmore;John M. Thorp

  • Preterm neonatal morbidity and mortality by gestational age: A contemporary cohort

    Tracy A. Manuck;Madeline Murguia Rice;Jennifer L. Bailit;William A. Grobman

  • Treatment of Subclinical Hypothyroidism or Hypothyroxinemia in Pregnancy

    B. M. Casey;E. A. Thom;A. M. Peaceman;M. W. Varner

  • Fetal fibronectin as a predictor of preterm birth in patients with symptoms: a multicenter trial.

    A. M. Peaceman;W. W. Andrews;J. M. Thorp;S. P. Cliver

  • Development of a nomogram for prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery.

    William A. Grobman;Yinglei Lai;Mark B. Landon;Catherine Y. Spong

  • A trial of 17 alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate to prevent prematurity in twins.

    Dwight J. Rouse;Steve N. Caritis;Alan M. Peaceman;Anthony Sciscione

  • Long-Term Outcomes After Repeat Doses of Antenatal Corticosteroids

    Ronald J. Wapner;Yoram Sorokin;Lisa Mele;Francee Johnson

  • Prevalence of Low Sexual Desire and Hypoactive Sexual Desire Disorder in a Nationally Representative Sample of US Women

    Suzanne L. West;Aimee A. D’Aloisio;Robert P. Agans;William D. Kalsbeek

  • Antenatal betamethasone for women at risk for late preterm delivery

    Cynthia Gyamfi-Bannerman;Elizabeth A. Thom;Sean C. Blackwell;Alan T N Tita

Frequent Co-Authors

Ronald J. Wapner
Ronald J. Wapner Columbia University
Dwight J. Rouse
Dwight J. Rouse Brown University
Brian M. Mercer
Brian M. Mercer Case Western Reserve University
Yoram Sorokin
Yoram Sorokin Wayne State University
Michael W. Varner
Michael W. Varner University of Utah
Catherine Y. Spong
Catherine Y. Spong The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Susan M. Ramin
Susan M. Ramin The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Steve N. Caritis
Steve N. Caritis University of Pittsburgh
George R. Saade
George R. Saade The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston
Jay D. Iams
Jay D. Iams The Ohio State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Navigating a medical career in the USA offers many flexible, online degree options for aspiring professionals. One popular path is through online rn to bsn programs without clinicals, ideal for working registered nurses seeking to earn their Bachelor of Science in Nursing while balancing job and life commitments. These programs remove the clinical component, making them especially convenient for those with prior hands-on experience.

For those aiming for leadership or advanced clinical roles, you might consider short dnp programs available online. These accelerated tracks help nurses complete their Doctor of Nursing Practice degree faster than traditional routes. If you're searching for the most accessible options, exploring the easiest dnp program reddit recommendations can offer practical student insights on workload and support.

Those interested in entering the field quickly may explore the 6 month lpn program, which provides a swift pathway into practical nursing. By leveraging these online degrees, students in the USA can pursue flexible and accelerated routes into rewarding medical careers.

Best Scientists Citing John M. Thorp

Trending Scientists