World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
106
Citations
42306
World Ranking
6529
National Ranking
3467

Steve N. Caritis publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steve N. Caritis sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 496 publications — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Steve N. Caritis D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steve N. Caritis sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 106 D-Index — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Internal medicine
  • Pregnancy
  • Fetus

His primary scientific interests are in Pregnancy, Obstetrics, Gestation, Gynecology and Odds ratio. Specifically, his work in Pregnancy is concerned with the study of Gestational age. His Obstetrics research includes themes of Preeclampsia, Confidence interval, Randomization, Fetus and Cesarean delivery.

He is interested in Fetal fibronectin, which is a branch of Gestation. The various areas that he examines in his Gynecology study include Hysterectomy, Vaginal birth and Predictive value of tests. Steve N. Caritis has included themes like Interleukin 6 and Placenta previa in his Odds ratio study.

His most cited work include:

  • Maternal morbidity associated with multiple repeat cesarean deliveries (1027 citations)
  • Low-dose aspirin to prevent preeclampsia in women at high risk (501 citations)
  • Risk Factors for Preeclampsia, Abruptio Placentae, and Adverse Neonatal Outcomes among Women with Chronic Hypertension (360 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

His main research concerns Pregnancy, Obstetrics, Gestation, Internal medicine and Gestational age. His Pregnancy study incorporates themes from Odds ratio, Pharmacokinetics, Gynecology, Prospective cohort study and Pediatrics. His Gynecology study combines topics in areas such as Young adult, Vaginal delivery and Cesarean delivery.

His work carried out in the field of Obstetrics brings together such families of science as Birth weight, Diabetes mellitus, Randomized controlled trial, Gestational diabetes and Cohort. The concepts of his Gestation study are interwoven with issues in Body mass index, Fetus and Bacterial vaginosis. He focuses mostly in the field of Internal medicine, narrowing it down to matters related to Endocrinology and, in some cases, Receptor.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Pregnancy (51.27%)
  • Obstetrics (49.86%)
  • Gestation (30.70%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2014-2021)?

  • Obstetrics (49.86%)
  • Pregnancy (51.27%)
  • Gestation (30.70%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Steve N. Caritis mostly deals with Obstetrics, Pregnancy, Gestation, Gestational age and Internal medicine. His work deals with themes such as Neonatal outcomes, Gestational diabetes, Retrospective cohort study and Cohort, which intersect with Obstetrics. His Pregnancy research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Odds ratio, Pharmacokinetics, Vomiting, Gynecology and Nausea.

He interconnects Diabetes mellitus, Intraventricular hemorrhage and Respiratory distress in the investigation of issues within Gestation. His Gestational age research incorporates elements of Birth weight, Randomized controlled trial, Pediatrics and Cerebral palsy. His Internal medicine research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Placebo, Endocrinology and Preeclampsia.

Between 2014 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Preterm neonatal morbidity and mortality by gestational age: A contemporary cohort (160 citations)
  • Safety and pharmacokinetics of pravastatin used for the prevention of preeclampsia in high-risk pregnant women: a pilot randomized controlled trial (122 citations)
  • A Randomized Trial of Intrapartum Fetal ECG ST-Segment Analysis (66 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Internal medicine
  • Pregnancy
  • Fetus

His primary areas of investigation include Pregnancy, Obstetrics, Gestation, Gestational age and Buprenorphine. The Pregnancy study combines topics in areas such as Young adult, Pharmacokinetics, Gynecology and Randomized controlled trial. As part of the same scientific family, Steve N. Caritis usually focuses on Gynecology, concentrating on Small for gestational age and intersecting with Intrauterine growth restriction.

His Obstetrics research incorporates themes from Odds ratio, Vaginal delivery, Betamethasone, Apgar score and Late preterm. His studies deal with areas such as Diabetes mellitus, Pregnancy outcomes and Confidence interval as well as Gestation. He has researched Gestational age in several fields, including Pediatrics, Neonatal intensive care unit and Gestational hypertension, Preeclampsia.

Best Publications

  • Maternal morbidity associated with multiple repeat cesarean deliveries

    Robert M. Silver;Mark B. Landon;Dwight J. Rouse;Kenneth J. Leveno

  • Prevention of recurrent preterm delivery by 17 alpha-hydroxyprogesterone caproate

    Paul J. Meis;Mark Klebanoff;Elizabeth Thom;Mitchell P. Dombrowski

  • Timing of Elective Repeat Cesarean Delivery at Term and Neonatal Outcomes

    Alan T N Tita;Mark B. Landon;Catherine Y. Spong;Yinglei Lai

  • Antenatal Betamethasone for Women at Risk for Late Preterm Delivery

    C. Gyamfi-Bannerman;E. A. Thom;S. C. Blackwell;A. T N Tita

  • LOW-DOSE ASPIRIN TO PREVENT PREECLAMPSIA IN WOMEN AT HIGH RISK

    Steve Caritis;Baha Sibai;John Hauth;Marshall D Lindheimer

  • The Preterm Prediction Study: Effect of gestational age and cause of preterm birth on subsequent obstetric outcome

    Brian M. Mercer;Robert L. Goldenberg;Atef H. Moawad;Paul J. Meis

  • Risk factors for preeclampsia in healthy nulliparous women: A prospective multicenter study

    Bahaeddine M Sibai;Tavia Gordon;Elizabeth Thom;Steven N. Caritis

  • The preterm prediction study: the value of new vs standard risk factors in predicting early and all spontaneous preterm births. NICHD MFMU Network.

    R L Goldenberg;J D Iams;B M Mercer;P J Meis

  • Hypertensive disorders in twin versus singleton gestations

    Baha M. Sibai;John Hauth;Steve Caritis;Marshall D. Lindheimer

  • Risk Factors for Preeclampsia, Abruptio Placentae, and Adverse Neonatal Outcomes among Women with Chronic Hypertension

    Baha M. Sibai;Marshall Lindheimer;John Hauth;Steve Caritis

  • Adverse perinatal outcomes are significantly higher in severe gestational hypertension than in mild preeclampsia

    Alan Buchbinder;Bahaeddine M Sibai;Steve Caritis;Cora MacPherson

  • The MFMU Cesarean Registry: Factors affecting the success of trial of labor after previous cesarean delivery

    Mark B. Landon;Sharon Leindecker;Catherine Y. Spong;John C. Hauth

  • Temporal changes in drug metabolism (CYP1A2, CYP2D6 and CYP3A Activity) during pregnancy

    Timothy S. Tracy;Raman Venkataramanan;Douglas D. Glover;Steve N. Caritis

  • The preterm prediction study: Risk factors for indicated preterm births

    P. J. Meis;R. L. Goldenberg;B. M. Mercer;J. D. Iams

  • Preterm neonatal morbidity and mortality by gestational age: A contemporary cohort

    Tracy A. Manuck;Madeline Murguia Rice;Jennifer L. Bailit;William A. Grobman

  • Treatment of Subclinical Hypothyroidism or Hypothyroxinemia in Pregnancy

    B. M. Casey;E. A. Thom;A. M. Peaceman;M. W. Varner

  • Failure of Metronidazole to Prevent Preterm Delivery among Pregnant Women with Asymptomatic Trichomonas vaginalis Infection

    M. A. Klebanoff;J. C. Carey;J. C. Hauth;S. L. Hillier

  • The preterm prediction study: a clinical risk assessment system.

    B.M. Mercer;R.L. Goldenberg;A. Das;A.H. Moawad

  • Development of a nomogram for prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery.

    William A. Grobman;Yinglei Lai;Mark B. Landon;Catherine Y. Spong

  • Antenatal betamethasone for women at risk for late preterm delivery

    Cynthia Gyamfi-Bannerman;Elizabeth A. Thom;Sean C. Blackwell;Alan T N Tita

Frequent Co-Authors

Ronald J. Wapner
Ronald J. Wapner Columbia University
Dwight J. Rouse
Dwight J. Rouse Brown University
Menachem Miodovnik
Menachem Miodovnik National Institutes of Health
Brian M. Mercer
Brian M. Mercer Case Western Reserve University
Michael W. Varner
Michael W. Varner University of Utah
Yoram Sorokin
Yoram Sorokin Wayne State University
John M. Thorp
John M. Thorp University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Catherine Y. Spong
Catherine Y. Spong The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Jay D. Iams
Jay D. Iams The Ohio State University
Mary J. O'Sullivan
Mary J. O'Sullivan University of Miami

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a traditional MD program in the USA requires significant time and resources. However, there are many flexible alternatives for those interested in healthcare careers or medical fields. For example, accelerated lpn programs allow students to quickly become Licensed Practical Nurses through online study. This is a great option for those eager to begin working with patients sooner.

If you’re aiming to advance further, there are online msn pmhnp programs that prepare graduates for high-demand roles in psychiatric mental health. These programs are typically designed for working nurses who want to expand their scope of practice and specialize in mental health.

The administrative side of medicine is also critical. Consider a healthcare administration degree online to learn about healthcare management, policy, and organizational leadership. For those looking to reach higher leadership roles, there are affordable online mha programs to boost your credentials and open doors to executive positions in healthcare organizations.

Best Scientists Citing Steve N. Caritis

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles