World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 105 6799 6393 3590 3330 827 38678

Cande V. Ananth publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Cande V. Ananth between 1994 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Cande V. Ananth published across 32 years, from 1994 to 2025, averaging 26.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 66 publications in 2016. 54 of the 854 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1994 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 66. Peak 66 publications in 2016. 1994: 4 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 19 publications 1998: 13 publications 1999: 13 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 31 publications 2002: 17 publications 2003: 23 publications 2004: 30 publications 2005: 30 publications 2006: 32 publications 2007: 24 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 18 publications 2010: 14 publications 2011: 13 publications 2012: 22 publications 2013: 43 publications 2014: 44 publications 2015: 57 publications 2016: 66 publications 2017: 40 publications 2018: 57 publications 2019: 36 publications 2020: 44 publications 2021: 41 publications 2022: 21 publications 2023: 22 publications 2024: 33 publications 2025: 21 publications
1994 2025

854 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Cande V. Ananth: publications per year, 1994 to 2025
Year Publications
1994 4
1995 4
1996 6
1997 19
1998 13
1999 13
2000 6
2001 31
2002 17
2003 23
2004 30
2005 30
2006 32
2007 24
2008 10
2009 18
2010 14
2011 13
2012 22
2013 43
2014 44
2015 57
2016 66
2017 40
2018 57
2019 36
2020 44
2021 41
2022 21
2023 22
2024 33
2025 21
Total 854
Download as CSV

Cande V. Ananth publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cande V. Ananth sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 821–840 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 827 publications — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186 827
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Cande V. Ananth D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cande V. Ananth sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 104–105 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 105 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513 105
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Cande V. Ananth is affiliated with Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on medicine, with a notable emphasis on pediatrics, perinatology, and child health; obstetrics and gynecology; public health, environmental and occupational health; cardiology and cardiovascular medicine; and epidemiology.

The scientist's work extensively covers topics such as pregnancy and preeclampsia studies, maternal and fetal healthcare, maternal and perinatal health interventions, assisted reproductive technology and twin pregnancy, birth development and health, cardiovascular issues in pregnancy, and gestational diabetes research and management.

Frequent publication venues include:

  • American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology
  • Gynecologic Oncology
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology MFM

Among recent papers authored or coauthored by Ananth are:

  • Epidemiology of coronavirus disease 2019 in pregnancy: risk factors and associations with adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes, 2020, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Maternal Mortality in the United States, 2021, Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Maternal mortality in the United States: are the high and rising rates due to changes in obstetrical factors, maternal medical conditions, or maternal mortality surveillance?, 2024, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Placental abruption at near-term and term gestations: pathophysiology, epidemiology, diagnosis, and management, 2023, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
  • Epidemiology and trends in stroke mortality in the USA, 1975-2019, 2022, International Journal of Epidemiology

Cande V. Ananth has collaborated frequently with researchers including Justin S. Brandt, Emily B. Rosenfeld, Hillary L. Graham, K.S. Joseph, and Jason D. Wright.

Best Publications

  • Pre-eclampsia rates in the United States, 1980-2010: age-period-cohort analysis

    Cande V Ananth;Katherine M Keyes;Ronald J Wapner

  • Nationwide trends in the performance of inpatient hysterectomy in the United States

    Jason D. Wright;Thomas J. Herzog;Jennifer Tsui;Cande V. Ananth

  • Regression models for ordinal responses: a review of methods and applications.

    C V Ananth;D G Kleinbaum

  • Epidemiology of preterm birth and its clinical subtypes.

    Cande V. Ananth;Anthony M. Vintzileos

  • Robotically Assisted vs Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Among Women With Benign Gynecologic Disease

    Jason D. Wright;Cande V. Ananth;Sharyn N. Lewin;William M. Burke

  • Etiology and risk factors for placenta previa: an overview and meta-analysis of observational studies

    Ambarina S. Faiz;Cande V. Ananth

  • The association of placenta previa with history of cesarean delivery and abortion: A metaanalysis

    Cande V. Ananth;John C. Smulian;Anthony M. Vintzileos

  • Trends in preterm birth and perinatal mortality among singletons : United states, 1989 through 2000

    Cande V. Ananth;K S. Joseph;Yinka Oyelese;Kitaw Demissie

  • Placental abruption and adverse perinatal outcomes.

    Cande V. Ananth;Gertrud S. Berkowitz;David A. Savitz;Robert H. Lapinski

  • Postpartum hemorrhage: epidemiology, risk factors, and causes.

    Yinka Oyelese;Cande V. Ananth

  • Previous cesarean delivery and risks of placenta previa and placental abruption.

    Darios Getahun;Yinka Oyelese;Hamisu M. Salihu;Cande V. Ananth

  • Gestational diabetes in the United States: temporal trends 1989 through 2004

    Darios Getahun;Darios Getahun;Carl Nath;Cande V. Ananth;Martin R. Chavez

  • Placental Abruption and Perinatal Mortality in the United States

    Cande V. Ananth;Allen J. Wilcox

  • Maternal-fetal conditions necessitating a medical intervention resulting in preterm birth

    Cande V. Ananth;Anthony M. Vintzileos

  • Maternal Cigarette Smoking as a Risk Factor for Placental Abruption, Placenta Previa, and Uterine Bleeding in Pregnancy

    Cande V. Ananth;David A. Savitz;Edwin R. Luther

  • Preterm premature rupture of membranes, intrauterine infection, and oligohydramnios: risk factors for placental abruption.

    Cande V Ananth;Yinka Oyelese;Neela Srinivas;Lami Yeo

  • Incidence of Placental Abruption in Relation to Cigarette Smoking and Hypertensive Disorders During Pregnancy: A Meta-Analysis of Observational Studies

    Cande V Ananth;John C Smulian;Anthony M Vintzileos

  • Placental abruption and its association with hypertension and prolonged rupture of membranes : A methodologic review and meta-analysis

    Cande V. Ananth;David A. Savitz;David A. Savitz;Michelle A. Williams;Michelle A. Williams

  • Breast Cancer Mortality Among Female Electrical Workers in the United States

    Dana P. Loomis;David A. Savitz;Cande V. Ananth

  • Robotically Assisted vs Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Among Women With Benign Gynecologic Disease

    Jason D. Wright;Cande V. Anath;Sharyn N. Lewin;William M. Burke

Frequent Co-Authors

Jason D. Wright
Jason D. Wright Columbia University
Anthony M. Vintzileos
Anthony M. Vintzileos Winthrop-University Hospital
Dawn L. Hershman
Dawn L. Hershman Columbia University
Alfred I. Neugut
Alfred I. Neugut Columbia University
Mary E. D'Alton
Mary E. D'Alton Columbia University
Michelle A. Williams
Michelle A. Williams Harvard University
Ronald J. Wapner
Ronald J. Wapner Columbia University
David A. Savitz
David A. Savitz Brown University
Russell S. Kirby
Russell S. Kirby University of South Florida
Thomas J. Herzog
Thomas J. Herzog University of Cincinnati

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students considering a medical career in the USA, online degrees offer flexible paths into healthcare professions. Many registered nurses seek to advance their credentials through online rn to bsn programs without clinicals, which provide a convenient way to earn a BSN degree without traditional in-person clinical requirements. This is ideal for working professionals who need to balance their studies with employment or other obligations.

Nursing professionals looking for the highest level of clinical education can explore the shortest post master's dnp program options. These accelerated programs allow nurses to earn their Doctor of Nursing Practice degree faster, often through intensive coursework and flexible scheduling.

Those seeking even more convenience may consider online dnp programs that are designed to be accessible for busy nurses. These programs typically offer a blend of online coursework and minimal on-campus requirements.

For entry-level pathways, accelerated lpn programs offer a fast track to becoming a Licensed Practical Nurse, enabling students to enter the workforce quickly and gain experience in patient care while pursuing further education if desired.

Best Scientists Citing Cande V. Ananth

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles