World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Caroline A Crowther

Caroline A Crowther

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
101
Citations
40214
World Ranking
7937
National Ranking
19

Caroline A Crowther publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Caroline A Crowther sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 493 publications — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Caroline A Crowther D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Caroline A Crowther sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 101 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2019 - Fellow of the Royal Society of New Zealand

Overview

Caroline A Crowther is affiliated with the University of Auckland in New Zealand and has an extensive body of research primarily in the field of medicine. Their work focuses notably on pediatrics, perinatology, and child health, as well as obstetrics and gynecology. Additional subfields include pulmonary and respiratory medicine, epidemiology, and public health.

The scientist's research topics encompass neonatal respiratory health, gestational diabetes management, infant development and preterm care, birth and developmental health, infant nutrition, preterm birth and chorioamnionitis, and outcomes related to bariatric surgery.

Frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
  • The Journal of Pediatrics
  • PLoS ONE
  • BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
  • PLoS Medicine

Some of the recent papers authored or co-authored by Caroline A Crowther are:

  • "Evaluating Progestogens for Preventing Preterm birth International Collaborative (EPPPIC): meta-analysis of individual participant data from randomised controlled trials," 2021, The Lancet
  • "Induction of labour at or beyond 37 weeks' gestation," 2020, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
  • "Interventions to prevent women from developing gestational diabetes mellitus: an overview of Cochrane Reviews," 2020, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
  • "Lower versus Higher Glycemic Criteria for Diagnosis of Gestational Diabetes," 2022, New England Journal of Medicine
  • "A core outcome set for studies of gestational diabetes mellitus prevention and treatment," 2020, Diabetologia

Caroline A Crowther has collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including:

  • Jane E. Harding
  • Luling Lin
  • Greg Gamble
  • Jane M. Alsweiler
  • Christopher J. D. McKinlay

The scientist's publication record includes significant contributions to neonatal respiratory health research and gestational diabetes research and management, reflecting the interdisciplinary nature of their work across maternal and infant health domains.

In recognition of career contributions, Caroline A Crowther was named a Fellow of the Royal Society of New Zealand in 2019.

Best Publications

  • Effect of treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus on pregnancy outcomes

    Caroline A. Crowther;Janet E. Hiller;John R. Moss;Andrew J. Mcphee

  • Magnesium sulphate for women at risk of preterm birth for neuroprotection of the fetus

    Lex W Doyle;Caroline A Crowther;Philippa Middleton;Stephane Marret

  • Induction of labour for improving birth outcomes for women at or beyond term

    Philippa Middleton;Emily Shepherd;Caroline A Crowther

  • Moving beyond essential interventions for reduction of maternal mortality (the WHO Multicountry Survey on Maternal and Newborn Health): a cross-sectional study

    J.P. Souza;A.M. Gülmezoglu;J. Vogel;G. Carroli

  • CLASP - A RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF LOW-DOSE ASPIRIN FOR THE PREVENTION AND TREATMENT OF PREECLAMPSIA AMONG 9364 PREGNANT-WOMEN

    G Beroyz;R Casale;A Farreiros;M Palermo

  • Prenatal administration of progesterone for preventing preterm birth in women considered to be at risk of preterm birth

    Jodie M Dodd;Leanne Jones;Vicki Flenady;Robert Cincotta

  • Effect of magnesium sulfate given for neuroprotection before preterm birth - A randomized controlled trial

    Caroline A. Crowther;Janet E. Hiller;Lex W. Doyle;Ross R. Haslam

  • Vitamins C and E and the risks of preeclampsia and perinatal complications

    Alice R. Rumbold;Caroline A. Crowther;Ross R. Haslam;Gustaaf A. Dekker

  • Antenatal lifestyle advice for women who are overweight or obese: LIMIT randomised trial

    Jodie M Dodd;Jodie M Dodd;Deborah Turnbull;Andrew J McPhee;Andrea R Deussen

  • Magnesium sulphate for preventing preterm birth in threatened preterm labour

    Caroline A Crowther;Julie Brown;Christopher J D McKinlay;Philippa Middleton

  • The risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes in women who are overweight or obese

    Chaturica Athukorala;Alice R Rumbold;Kristyn J Willson;Caroline A Crowther

  • Different corticosteroids and regimens for accelerating fetal lung maturation for women at risk of preterm birth

    Fiona C Brownfoot;Daniela I Gagliardi;Emily Bain;Philippa Middleton

  • Antioxidants for preventing pre-eclampsia

    Alice R. Rumbold;Lelia Duley;Caroline A. Crowther;Ross R. Haslam

  • Vitamin C supplementation in pregnancy

    Alice Rumbold;Erika Ota;Chie Nagata;Sadequa Shahrook

  • Repeat doses of prenatal corticosteroids for women at risk of preterm birth for improving neonatal health outcomes

    Caroline A. Crowther;Christopher J.D. Mckinlay;Philippa Middleton;Jane E. Harding

  • Magnesium supplementation in pregnancy

    Maria Makrides;Caroline A Crowther

  • Neonatal respiratory distress syndrome after repeat exposure to antenatal corticosteroids: a randomised controlled trial

    Caroline A Crowther;Ross R Haslam;Janet E Hiller;Lex W Doyle

  • Planned elective repeat caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for women with a previous caesarean birth

    Jodie M. Dodd;Caroline A. Crowther;Erasmo Huertas;Jeanne Marie Guise

  • Antenatal interventions for overweight or obese pregnant women: a systematic review of randomised trials

    JM Dodd;RM Grivell;CA Crowther;JS Robinson

  • Effect of Magnesium Sulfate Given for Neuroprotection Before Preterm Birth: A Randomized, Controlled Trial

    Caroline A. Crowther;Janet E. Hiller;Lex W. Doyle;Ross R. Haslam

Frequent Co-Authors

Lelia Duley
Lelia Duley University of Nottingham
Jane E. Harding
Jane E. Harding University of Auckland
Lex W. Doyle
Lex W. Doyle University of Melbourne
Maria Makrides
Maria Makrides University of Adelaide
Zarko Alfirevic
Zarko Alfirevic University of Liverpool
Deborah Turnbull
Deborah Turnbull University of Adelaide
Peter A. Baghurst
Peter A. Baghurst University of Adelaide
Joshua P. Vogel
Joshua P. Vogel Burnet Institute
Gary A. Wittert
Gary A. Wittert University of Adelaide

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you are interested in healthcare but exploring alternatives to traditional medical school, there are several accessible online degree options. For those with a bachelor’s degree in a non-nursing field, direct entry nurse practitioner programs for non-nurses online offer a fast track into advanced nursing careers. These programs allow you to become a nurse practitioner without prior nursing experience, combining online learning with clinical placements.

Aspiring registered nurses can also consider online bsn programs for non nurses, which provide flexibility and a pathway to licensure. These programs are designed to accommodate those making a career change or seeking more convenient study options.

For students interested in healthcare administration, medical billing and coding schools with financial aid offer training in this in-demand field, making entry into healthcare support roles more accessible and affordable.

You may also wonder about entrance testing for nursing programs. In some cases, it’s possible to enter nursing without standardized tests. To learn more, see do i need to take the teas test for lpn for a list of schools that do not require the TEAS or HESI exams.

Best Scientists Citing Caroline A Crowther

Trending Scientists