World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Jonathan M. Morris

Jonathan M. Morris

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 79 17656 16595 8820 8152 467 20831

Jonathan M. Morris publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jonathan M. Morris between 1995 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jonathan M. Morris published across 31 years, from 1995 to 2025, averaging 18.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 48 publications in 2016. 44 of the 573 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1995 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 48. Peak 48 publications in 2016. 1995: 3 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 0 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 7 publications 2008: 15 publications 2009: 22 publications 2010: 17 publications 2011: 24 publications 2012: 34 publications 2013: 38 publications 2014: 38 publications 2015: 41 publications 2016: 48 publications 2017: 36 publications 2018: 20 publications 2019: 24 publications 2020: 31 publications 2021: 29 publications 2022: 33 publications 2023: 30 publications 2024: 26 publications 2025: 18 publications
1995 2025

573 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jonathan M. Morris: publications per year, 1995 to 2025
Year Publications
1995 3
1996 2
1997 0
1998 3
1999 1
2000 0
2001 6
2002 5
2003 6
2004 9
2005 6
2006 1
2007 7
2008 15
2009 22
2010 17
2011 24
2012 34
2013 38
2014 38
2015 41
2016 48
2017 36
2018 20
2019 24
2020 31
2021 29
2022 33
2023 30
2024 26
2025 18
Total 573
Download as CSV

Jonathan M. Morris publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan M. Morris sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 461–480 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 467 publications — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751 467
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Jonathan M. Morris D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan M. Morris sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 78–79 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 79 D-Index — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891 79
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Jonathan M. Morris is affiliated with the Mayo Clinic in the United States and has an extensive publication record primarily in the field of medicine. Their research spans multiple subfields, with a focus on surgery, biomedical engineering, neurology, pathology and forensic medicine, as well as pulmonary and respiratory medicine.

Their work covers a broad range of topics, including:

  • Anatomy and Medical Technology
  • Surgical Simulation and Training
  • Management of metastatic bone disease
  • Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
  • Digital Imaging in Medicine
  • Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Reconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques

Their recent significant papers include:

  • "COVID-19 and the role of 3D printing in medicine," published in 3D Printing in Medicine (2020)
  • "Radiofrequency Ablation for the Palliative Treatment of Bone Metastases: Outcomes from the Multicenter OsteoCool Tumor Ablation Post-Market Study (OPuS One Study) in 100 Patients," published in Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology (2020)
  • "Interpretation of regulatory factors for 3D printing at hospitals and medical centers, or at the point of care," published in 3D Printing in Medicine (2022)
  • "A clinical primer for the glymphatic system," published in Brain (2021)
  • "Diagnostic Yield of Lateral Decubitus Digital Subtraction Myelogram Stratified by Brain MRI Findings," published in Neurology (2021)

Jonathan M. Morris frequently collaborates with a group of coauthors, including:

  • Maria Peris-Celda
  • Christopher S. Graffeo
  • Dong Kun Kim
  • Basel Sharaf
  • Peter S. Rose

Their publications are often featured in specific journals with frequent appearances in:

  • Journal of Neurological Surgery Part B Skull Base
  • Operative Techniques in Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery
  • 3D Printing in Medicine
  • Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery Global Open
  • American Journal of Neuroradiology

Their work reflects a multidisciplinary approach integrating advanced surgical techniques, imaging, and emerging technologies such as 3D printing. This intersection of biomedical engineering and clinical practice forms a notable component of their research output, particularly in areas related to surgical simulation, anatomical study, and treatment strategies for conditions involving bone metastases and spinal pathology.

Best Publications

  • Elucidating the pathophysiology of syringomyelia

    John D. Heiss;Nicholas Patronas;Hetty L. DeVroom;Thomas Shawker

  • A systematic review of severe morbidity in infants born late preterm

    Margreet J. Teune;Sabine Bakhuizen;Cynthia Gyamfi Bannerman;Brent C. Opmeer

  • Exosomes: Mechanisms of Uptake

    Kelly J. McKelvey;Katie L. Powell;Katie L. Powell;Anthony W. Ashton;Jonathan M. Morris;Jonathan M. Morris

  • Population-based trends in pregnancy hypertension and pre-eclampsia: an international comparative study

    Christine Roberts;Jane B Ford;Charles S Algert;Sussie Antonsen

  • Delayed versus Immediate Cord Clamping in Preterm Infants

    William O Tarnow-Mordi;Jonathan Morris;Adrienne Kirby;K Robledo

  • A balancing act: mechanisms by which the fetus avoids rejection by the maternal immune system

    Julia C Warning;Sharon A McCracken;Jonathan M Morris

  • Circulating markers of oxidative stress are raised in normal pregnancy and pre-eclampsia.

    J. M. Morris;N. K. Gopaul;M. J. R. Endresen;M. Knight

  • Hypertensive disorders in pregnancy: a population-based study

    Christine L Roberts;Charles S Algert;Jonathan M Morris;Jane B Ford

  • Oxidative stress, placental ageing-related pathologies and adverse pregnancy outcomes

    Zakia Sultana;Kaushik Maiti;John Aitken;Jonathan Morris

  • Serum inhibin A and activin A are elevated prior to the onset of pre-eclampsia

    S. Muttukrishna;R.A. North;J. Morris;J.-C. Schellenberg

  • Planned early birth versus expectant management for women with preterm prelabour rupture of membranes prior to 37 weeks' gestation for improving pregnancy outcome

    Diana M Bond;Philippa Middleton;Kate M Levett;David P. van der Ham

  • Incidence and outcomes of pregnancy-associated cancer in Australia, 1994-2008: a population-based linkage study.

    Y.Y. Lee;Christine L. Roberts;Timothy A. Dobbins;E Stavrou

  • Radiological Society of North America (RSNA) 3D printing Special Interest Group (SIG): guidelines for medical 3D printing and appropriateness for clinical scenarios

    Leonid Chepelev;Nicole Wake;Justin Ryan;Waleed Althobaity

  • Measuring maternal morbidity in routinely collected health data: development and validation of a maternal morbidity outcome indicator.

    Christine L. Roberts;Carolyn A. Cameron;Jane C. Bell;Charles S. Algert

  • Making choices for childbirth: a randomized controlled trial of a decision-aid for informed birth after cesarean.

    Allison Shorten;Brett Shorten;John Keogh;Sandra West

  • Biopsy validation of 18F-DOPA PET and biodistribution in gliomas for neurosurgical planning and radiotherapy target delineation: results of a prospective pilot study

    Deanna H. Pafundi;Nadia N. Laack;Ryan S. Youland;Ian F. Parney

  • Outcomes of pregnancies in women with pre-gestational diabetes mellitus and gestational diabetes mellitus; a population-based study in New South Wales, Australia, 1998-2002.

    A. W. Shand;J. C. Bell;A. McElduff;J. Morris

  • Epidemiology and trends for Caesarean section births in New South Wales, Australia: A population-based study

    Efty P Stavrou;Jane B Ford;Antonia W Shand;Antonia W Shand;Jonathan M Morris;Jonathan M Morris

  • Immediate delivery compared with expectant management after preterm pre-labour rupture of the membranes close to term (PPROMT trial): a randomised controlled trial

    Jonathan M Morris;Christine L Roberts;Jennifer R Bowen;Jennifer R Bowen;Jillian A Patterson

  • Preoperative assessment of meningioma stiffness using magnetic resonance elastography

    Matthew C. Murphy;John Huston;Kevin J. Glaser;Armando Manduca

Frequent Co-Authors

Christine L. Roberts
Christine L. Roberts University of Sydney
Judy M. Simpson
Judy M. Simpson University of Sydney
Rickey E. Carter
Rickey E. Carter Mayo Clinic
Caroline A Crowther
Caroline A Crowther University of Auckland
Euan M. Wallace
Euan M. Wallace Monash University
John P. Newnham
John P. Newnham University of Western Australia
Gene G. Hunder
Gene G. Hunder Mayo Clinic
Harry J. Cloft
Harry J. Cloft Mayo Clinic
Robert D. Brown
Robert D. Brown Mayo Clinic

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As medicine continues to evolve, students are exploring flexible and cost-effective learning opportunities. Online degrees provide an accessible pathway into healthcare careers, allowing you to balance study with work and family commitments.

For those starting their journey, online nursing programs offer a solid foundation in patient care and clinical skills. If you’re already a registered nurse seeking career advancement, affordable rn to bsn programs can help enhance your credentials and open doors to leadership roles.

Aspiring nurse practitioners can benefit from enrolling in cheap np programs, making this advanced practice role more financially attainable. Additionally, experienced nurses interested in research or academic careers may consider online phd nursing programs.

Whether you’re looking to start, specialize, or advance, these online options provide a range of pathways in healthcare. Consider your career goals and explore programs that fit both your needs and budget.

Best Scientists Citing Jonathan M. Morris

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles