World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
133
Citations
60359
World Ranking
2245
National Ranking
1267

Edward H. Oldfield publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edward H. Oldfield sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 540 publications — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Edward H. Oldfield D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edward H. Oldfield sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 133 D-Index — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Edward H. Oldfield was affiliated with the University of Virginia in the United States. Their academic work was focused mainly within the field of Medicine, with particular emphasis on Surgery and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine.

The primary topics addressed in their research included gallbladder and bile duct disorders, esophageal and gastrointestinal pathology, as well as abdominal trauma and injuries.

They published at least one article in the venue The American Journal of Gastroenterology. Their recent paper, published in 2020, was titled "S2328 A Tale of Two Perfs: Successful Repair of Dual Iatrogenic Duodenal Perforations Through Endoscopic Stenting." This article was published in The American Journal of Gastroenterology.

Frequent coauthors involved in their work included:

  • Ross C. Buerlein
  • Dushant Uppal

Throughout their career, Edward H. Oldfield contributed to multiple research themes within their primary and subfields, with a total of three publications recorded under Medicine, two under Surgery, and one in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine.

Best Publications

  • In vivo gene transfer with retroviral vector-producer cells for treatment of experimental brain tumors

    K. W. Culver;Zvi Ram;S. Wallbridge;H. Ishii

  • von Hippel-Lindau disease

    Russell R Lonser;Gladys M Glenn;McClellan Walther;Emily Y Chew

  • Convection-enhanced delivery of macromolecules in the brain

    R H Bobo;D W Laske;A Akbasak;P F Morrison

  • Pathophysiology of syringomyelia associated with Chiari I malformation of the cerebellar tonsils. Implications for diagnosis and treatment

    Edward H. Oldfield;Karin Muraszko;Thomas H. Shawker;Nicholas J. Patronas

  • Petrosal sinus sampling with and without corticotropin-releasing hormone for the differential diagnosis of Cushing's syndrome.

    Oldfield Eh;Doppman Jl;Nieman Lk;Chrousos Gp

  • Expression of Hypoxia-Inducible Cell-Surface Transmembrane Carbonic Anhydrases in Human Cancer

    Sergey Ivanov;Shu-Yuan Liao;Alla Ivanova;Alla Danilkovitch-Miagkova

  • Therapy of malignant brain tumors by intratumoral implantation of retroviral vector-producing cells

    Z. Ram;K. W. Culver;E. M. Oshiro;J. J. Viola

  • Pituitary Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Normal Human Volunteers: Occult Adenomas in the General Population

    Walter A. Hall;Mark G. Luciano;Mark G. Luciano;John L. Doppman;Nicholas J. Patronas

  • The emerging biology of the nitrite anion

    Mark T Gladwin;Alan N Schechter;Daniel B Kim-Shapiro;Rakesh P Patel

  • Pronounced and sustained central hypernoradrenergic function in major depression with melancholic features: relation to hypercortisolism and corticotropin-releasing hormone.

    Ma Li Wong;Mitchel A. Kling;Peter J. Munson;Samuel Listwak

  • Tumor regression with regional distribution of the targeted toxin TF-CRM107 in patients with malignant brain tumors

    Douglas W. Laske;Richard J. Youle;Edward H. Oldfield

  • Spinal arteriovenous malformations: a comparison of dural arteriovenous fistulas and intradural AVM's in 81 patients

    Rosenblum B;Oldfield Eh;Doppman Jl;Di Chiro G

  • Post-transcriptional regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor mRNA by the product of the VHL tumor suppressor gene

    J R Gnarra;S Zhou;M J Merrill;J R Wagner

  • Expression of the vascular permeability factor/vascular endothelial growth factor gene in central nervous system neoplasms.

    R A Berkman;M J Merrill;W C Reinhold;W T Monacci

  • Psychiatric implications of basic and clinical studies with corticotropin-releasing factor.

    P W Gold;G Chrousos;C Kellner;R Post

  • In Situ Retroviral-mediated Gene Transfer for the Treatment of Brain Tumors in Rats

    Z Ram;K W Culver;S Walbridge;R M Blaese

  • Elucidating the pathophysiology of syringomyelia

    John D. Heiss;Nicholas Patronas;Hetty L. DeVroom;Thomas Shawker

  • The natural history of hemangioblastomas of the central nervous system in patients with von Hippel-Lindau disease.

    John E. Wanebo;Russell R. Lonser;Gladys M. Glenn;Edward H. Oldfield

  • Expression of vascular permeability factor/vascular endothelial growth factor in normal rat tissues

    W. T. Monacci;M. J. Merrill;E. H. Oldfield

  • Gene Therapy for the Treatment of Brain Tumors Using Intra-Tumoral Transduction with the Thymidine Kinase Gene and Intravenous Ganciclovir. National Institutes of Health

    Oldfield Eh;Ram Z;Culver Kw;Blaese Rm

Frequent Co-Authors

John L. Doppman
John L. Doppman National Institutes of Health
Zhengping Zhuang
Zhengping Zhuang National Institutes of Health
George P. Chrousos
George P. Chrousos National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
Gordon B. Cutler
Gordon B. Cutler National Institutes of Health
Nicholas J. Patronas
Nicholas J. Patronas National Institutes of Health
Lynnette K. Nieman
Lynnette K. Nieman National Institutes of Health
Svetlana Pack
Svetlana Pack National Institutes of Health
Philip W. Gold
Philip W. Gold National Institutes of Health
Constantine A. Stratakis
Constantine A. Stratakis Foundation for Research and Technology Hellas
D. Lynn Loriaux
D. Lynn Loriaux Oregon Health & Science University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine in the USA goes beyond traditional medical school. Numerous lpn fast track program options are available online, allowing students to quickly enter nursing and patient care roles. These accelerated pathways are ideal for those who want to start working in healthcare as soon as possible.

Mental health is another area in high demand. By enrolling in online pmhnp programs, qualified nurses can become psychiatric-mental health nurse practitioners, equipping themselves to address the growing needs in mental healthcare.

Not all healthcare professionals work directly with patients. Leadership and administrative roles are crucial, and earning a degree through online healthcare administration programs prepares students for careers behind the scenes. Those seeking advanced leadership positions can consider the cheapest master's in healthcare administration to gain expertise and save on tuition.

These diverse online pathways offer accessible routes into healthcare, supporting a variety of interests and career aspirations.

Best Scientists Citing Edward H. Oldfield

Recently Published Articles