The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John L. Doppman sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 545 publications — 65th percentile
65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.
The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John L. Doppman sits on this spectrum.
This scientist: 107 D-Index — 70th percentile
70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.
The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.
John L. Doppman was affiliated with the National Institutes of Health in the United States. Their scientific career focused on contributions connected to this prominent research institution.
Throughout their career, Doppman did not have recorded frequent co-authors, recent papers, or notable publication venues available in the provided data. No information was available regarding their main fields or subfields of study, as well as specific topics of research.
Also absent from the data are details about book publications and awards received by the scientist. No records of scientific papers, including titles, years of publication, or venues, were found in the source information.
John L. Doppman was deceased at the time of this data compilation.
William Travis;R. Linnoila;Maria Tsokos;Charles Hitchcock
Oldfield Eh;Doppman Jl;Nieman Lk;Chrousos Gp
Walter A. Hall;Mark G. Luciano;Mark G. Luciano;John L. Doppman;Nicholas J. Patronas
Rosenblum B;Oldfield Eh;Doppman Jl;Di Chiro G
J A Norton;D L Fraker;H R Alexander;D J Venzon
F Gibril;J C Reynolds;J L Doppman;C C Chen
Sunita K. Agarwal;Mary Beth Kester;Larisa V. Debelenko;Christina Heppner
Stephen Marx;Allen M. Spiegel;Monica C. Skarulis;John L. Doppman
Magiakou Ma;Mastorakos G;Oldfield Eh;Gomez Mt
Heppner C;Kester Mb;Agarwal Sk;Debelenko Lv
Praveen K. Roy;David J. Venzon;Houmayoun Shojamanesh;Alaa Abou-Saif
Fang Yu;David J. Venzon;Jose Serrano;Stephan U. Goebel
K.S. Bankiewicz;E.H. Oldfield;C.C. Chiueh;J.L. Doppman
Oldfield Eh;Chrousos Gp;Schulte Hm;Schaaf M
J L Doppman;D L Miller;R Chang;T H Shawker
Françoise Brucker-Davis;Edward H. Oldfield;Monica C. Skarulis;John L. Doppman
Doppman Jl;Chang R;Fraker Dl;Norton Ja
Boaz Hirshberg;Andrea Livi;D. L. Bartlett;S. K. Libutti
Nora Jaskowiak;Nora Jaskowiak;Jeffrey A. Norton;H. Richard Alexander;John L. Doppman
Giovanni Di Chiro;Edward Oldfield;Donald C. Wright;Domenic De Michele
If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.
Exploring alternatives to a traditional medical degree can open up rewarding careers in healthcare. For those who don’t have a nursing background but want to fast-track their entry into nursing, direct entry msn programs for non-nursing majors online offer a flexible and accelerated route.
If you’re looking for accessible entry points into nursing, you might consider whats the easiest nursing program to get into? These programs often have less stringent admission requirements and can help prospective nurses get started on their journey.
Not all healthcare careers require direct patient care. Many students explore administrative roles, where you can earn a credential from accredited medical billing and coding schools with financial aid. This field is in high demand and offers the flexibility to learn online.
For those hoping to avoid standardized admission tests, consider nursing schools that don't require teas test. These schools remove additional barriers, making healthcare education more attainable for diverse learners.
