World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
55
Citations
23405
World Ranking
4184
National Ranking
1974

J. Zico Kolter publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where J. Zico Kolter sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 180 publications — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

J. Zico Kolter D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where J. Zico Kolter sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

J. Zico Kolter is affiliated with Carnegie Mellon University in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of computer science with a focus on artificial intelligence and machine learning. Their research spans several key topics, including adversarial robustness in machine learning, anomaly detection techniques and applications, domain adaptation and few-shot learning, topic modeling, machine learning and data classification, model reduction and neural networks, and natural language processing techniques.

Their recent publications demonstrate a strong presence in top-tier venues and preprint archives. Notable papers include:

  • Fast is better than free: Revisiting adversarial training (2020), published in arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Models (2023), published in arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Machine Learning for Sustainable Energy Systems (2021), published in Annual Review of Environment and Resources
  • DC3: A learning method for optimization with hard constraints (2021), published in arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Representation Engineering: A Top-Down Approach to AI Transparency (2023), published in arXiv (Cornell University)

Kolter's frequent coauthors include Yiding Jiang, Priya L. Donti, Shaojie Bai, Matt Fredrikson, and Aditi Raghunathan, reflecting collaborative work across multiple projects and research areas.

The major venues where they have published most frequently include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • Annual Review of Environment and Resources
  • 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
  • PLoS ONE

Kolter's work intersects fields such as:

  • Computer Science

With a detailed focus on subfields including:

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics
  • Molecular Biology

The emphasis on adversarial robustness and related machine learning techniques is evident in the number of publications. Their research covers both theoretical and applied aspects of AI, including optimization methods and transparency in machine learning models.

Best Publications

  • An Empirical Evaluation of Generic Convolutional and Recurrent Networks for Sequence Modeling

    Shaojie Bai;J. Zico Kolter;Vladlen Koltun

  • Towards fully autonomous driving: Systems and algorithms

    Jesse Levinson;Jake Askeland;Jan Becker;Jennifer Dolson

  • Dynamic Weighted Majority: An Ensemble Method for Drifting Concepts

    J. Zico Kolter;Marcus A. Maloof

  • Multimodal Transformer for Unaligned Multimodal Language Sequences

    Yao-Hung Hubert Tsai;Shaojie Bai;Paul Pu Liang;J. Zico Kolter;J. Zico Kolter

  • Provable defenses against adversarial examples via the convex outer adversarial polytope

    Eric Wong;J. Zico Kolter

  • Certified Adversarial Robustness via Randomized Smoothing

    Jeremy M. Cohen;Elan Rosenfeld;J. Zico Kolter

  • Approximate Inference in Additive Factorial HMMs with Application to Energy Disaggregation

    J. Zico Kolter;Tommi S. Jaakkola

  • Learning to Detect and Classify Malicious Executables in the Wild

    J. Zico Kolter;Marcus A. Maloof

  • Provable defenses against adversarial examples via the convex outer adversarial polytope

    J. Zico Kolter;Eric Wong

  • Fast is better than free: Revisiting adversarial training

    Eric Wong;Leslie Rice;J. Zico Kolter

  • Learning to detect malicious executables in the wild

    Unknown

  • OptNet: differentiable optimization as a layer in neural networks

    Brandon Amos;J. Zico Kolter

  • Scaling provable adversarial defenses

    Eric Wong;Frank R. Schmidt;Jan Hendrik Metzen;J. Zico Kolter

  • Differentiable Convex Optimization Layers

    Akshay Agrawal;Brandon Amos;Shane T. Barratt;Stephen P. Boyd

  • Near-Bayesian exploration in polynomial time

    J. Zico Kolter;Andrew Y. Ng

  • Deep Equilibrium Models

    Shaojie Bai;J. Zico Kolter;Vladlen Koltun

  • End-to-End Differentiable Physics for Learning and Control

    Filipe de Avila Belbute-Peres;Kevin A. Smith;Kelsey R. Allen;Josh Tenenbaum

  • Using additive expert ensembles to cope with concept drift

    Unknown

  • Gradient descent GAN optimization is locally stable

    Vaishnavh Nagarajan;J. Zico Kolter

  • Regularization and feature selection in least-squares temporal difference learning

    J. Zico Kolter;Andrew Y. Ng

  • Task-based End-to-end Model Learning in Stochastic Optimization

    Priya L. Donti;Brandon Amos;J. Zico Kolter

  • Differentiable MPC for End-to-end Planning and Control

    Brandon Amos;Ivan Dario Jimenez Rodriguez;Jacob Sacks;Byron Boots

Frequent Co-Authors

Vladlen Koltun
Vladlen Koltun Apple (United States)
Pradeep Ravikumar
Pradeep Ravikumar Carnegie Mellon University
Andrew Y. Ng
Andrew Y. Ng Stanford University
Ryan J. Tibshirani
Ryan J. Tibshirani University of California, Berkeley
Huan Zhang
Huan Zhang University of California, Los Angeles
Saurabh Kumar Garg
Saurabh Kumar Garg University of Tasmania
Ruslan Salakhutdinov
Ruslan Salakhutdinov Carnegie Mellon University
Zachary C. Lipton
Zachary C. Lipton Carnegie Mellon University
Ashish Kapoor
Ashish Kapoor Microsoft (United States)
Stephen Boyd
Stephen Boyd Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Computer Science in the USA opens many doors, but it’s important to weigh your options for online education and career advancement. Many students start by considering online associate degree programs, which offer a flexible way to enter the tech field or build a foundation before transferring to a bachelor’s program.

If you’re thinking about advancing your expertise, pursuing one of the best masters degree to get in technology can significantly boost your career. These programs are in high demand and often lead to strong job prospects and higher salaries.

Budget is also a crucial factor. For those seeking to lower tuition costs, exploring the most affordable online colleges can make a computer science degree more accessible. Additionally, students who may not have a high GPA shouldn’t lose hope—there are college with low gpa options available that offer quality online computer science programs.

No matter your starting point, a variety of flexible online degrees and pathways can help you reach your career goals in this rapidly growing industry.

Best Scientists Citing J. Zico Kolter

Trending Scientists