World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
53
Citations
16111
World Ranking
4718
National Ranking
2192

Prateek Mittal publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Prateek Mittal sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 201 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Prateek Mittal D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Prateek Mittal sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2017 - ACM Senior Member

Overview

Prateek Mittal is affiliated with Princeton University in the United States and has a research focus primarily in the field of Computer Science, with a significant number of publications totaling 178. Their work spans various subfields including Artificial Intelligence, Computer Networks and Communications, Signal Processing, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, and Hardware and Architecture.

The main topics covered in Mittal's research include:

  • Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
  • Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting
  • Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
  • Advanced Malware Detection Techniques
  • Network Security and Intrusion Detection
  • Cryptography and Data Security

Mittal's recent scholarly outputs include the following papers:

  • Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learning, 2020, published in Foundations and Trends® in Machine Learning
  • Falcon: Honest-Majority Maliciously Secure Framework for Private Deep Learning, 2021, published in DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journals)
  • RobustBench: a standardized adversarial robustness benchmark, 2020, published in arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Systematic Evaluation of Privacy Risks of Machine Learning Models, 2020, published in arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Visual Adversarial Examples Jailbreak Aligned Large Language Models, 2024, published in Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Frequent collaborators in Mittal's research include:

  • Vikash Sehwag
  • Saeed Mahloujifar
  • Chong Xiang
  • Ashwinee Panda
  • Jiachen T. Wang

The venues where Mittal has most commonly published are:

  • arXiv (Cornell University), with 67 publications
  • Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies, with 5 publications
  • Communications of the ACM, with 2 publications
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), with 2 publications
  • Foundations and Trends® in Machine Learning, with 1 publication

Mittal was awarded the ACM Senior Member distinction in 2017. The recognition highlights standing within the professional computing community.

Best Publications

  • Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learning

    Peter Kairouz;H. Brendan McMahan;Brendan Avent;Aurélien Bellet

  • Advances and open problems in federated learning

    Peter Kairouz;H. Brendan McMahan;Brendan Avent;Aurélien Bellet

  • SybilInfer: Detecting Sybil Nodes using Social Networks.

    George Danezis;Prateek Mittal

  • EASiER: encryption-based access control in social networks with efficient revocation

    Sonia Jahid;Prateek Mittal;Nikita Borisov

  • Analyzing Federated Learning through an Adversarial Lens

    Arjun Nitin Bhagoji;Supriyo Chakraborty;Prateek Mittal;Seraphin B. Calo

  • BotGrep: finding P2P bots with structured graph analysis

    Shishir Nagaraja;Prateek Mittal;Chi-Yao Hong;Matthew Caesar

  • Privacy Risks of Securing Machine Learning Models against Adversarial Examples

    Liwei Song;Reza Shokri;Prateek Mittal

  • Evolution of social-attribute networks: measurements, modeling, and implications using google+

    Neil Zhenqiang Gong;Wenchang Xu;Ling Huang;Prateek Mittal

  • BlackIoT: IoT botnet of high wattage devices can disrupt the power grid

    Saleh Soltan;Prateek Mittal;H. Vincent Poor

  • DARTS: Deceiving Autonomous Cars with Toxic Signs

    Chawin Sitawarin;Arjun Nitin Bhagoji;Arsalan Mosenia;Mung Chiang

  • SybilBelief: A Semi-Supervised Learning Approach for Structure-Based Sybil Detection

    Neil Zhenqiang Gong;Mario Frank;Prateek Mittal

  • Enhancing robustness of machine learning systems via data transformations

    Arjun Nitin Bhagoji;Daniel Cullina;Chawin Sitawarin;Prateek Mittal

  • Falcon: Honest-Majority Maliciously Secure Framework for Private Deep Learning

    Sameer Wagh;Shruti Tople;Fabrice Benhamouda;Eyal Kushilevitz

  • Denial of service or denial of security

    Nikita Borisov;George Danezis;Prateek Mittal;Parisa Tabriz

  • Dependence Makes You Vulnberable: Differential Privacy Under Dependent Tuples.

    Changchang Liu;Supriyo Chakraborty;Prateek Mittal

  • RAPTOR: routing attacks on privacy in tor

    Yixin Sun;Anne Edmundson;Laurent Vanbever;Oscar Li

  • Towards a Timely Causality Analysis for Enterprise Security.

    Yushan Liu;Mu Zhang;Ding Li;Kangkook Jee

  • DECENT: A decentralized architecture for enforcing privacy in online social networks

    S. Jahid;S. Nilizadeh;P. Mittal;N. Borisov

  • Dimensionality Reduction as a Defense against Evasion Attacks on Machine Learning Classifiers.

    Arjun Nitin Bhagoji;Daniel Cullina;Prateek Mittal

  • Cachet: a decentralized architecture for privacy preserving social networking with caching

    Shirin Nilizadeh;Sonia Jahid;Prateek Mittal;Nikita Borisov

  • RobustBench: a standardized adversarial robustness benchmark.

    Francesco Croce;Maksym Andriushchenko;Vikash Sehwag;Edoardo Debenedetti

  • HYDRA: Pruning adversarially robust neural networks

    Vikash Sehwag;Shiqi Wang;Prateek Mittal;Suman Jana

Frequent Co-Authors

Mung Chiang
Mung Chiang Purdue University West Lafayette
Nikita Borisov
Nikita Borisov University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Sanjeev R. Kulkarni
Sanjeev R. Kulkarni Princeton University
Shouling Ji
Shouling Ji Zhejiang University
Dawn Song
Dawn Song University of California, Berkeley
Nick Feamster
Nick Feamster University of Chicago
H. Vincent Poor
H. Vincent Poor Princeton University
Jennifer Rexford
Jennifer Rexford Princeton University
Neil Zhenqiang Gong
Neil Zhenqiang Gong Duke University
Matthew Caesar
Matthew Caesar University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science opens doors to a wide array of online degree options and career pathways. Many students looking for flexibility and lower tuition costs are considering specialized programs. For example, a bachelor of science in physics online can be a strong alternative for those interested in the fundamentals that drive innovations in computing and technology.

With the surge in data-driven industries, pursuing the cheapest master in data science can make graduates highly competitive, especially for roles in analytics, machine learning, and artificial intelligence. Similarly, students passionate about hardware, robotics, or power systems may consider the online electrical engineering career outcomes to understand job prospects and top programs.

Not every tech career requires a full degree. There are also easy licenses and certifications to get that can boost earning potential or help you switch fields quickly. Exploring these alternatives ensures you choose the educational pathway that matches your goals and resources.

Best Scientists Citing Prateek Mittal

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles