World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
88
Citations
32980
World Ranking
680
National Ranking
364

Mung Chiang publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mung Chiang sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 479 publications — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Mung Chiang D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mung Chiang sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 88 D-Index — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2020 - Fellow, National Academy of Inventors
  • 2014 - Fellow of John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation
  • 2013 - National Science Foundation Alan T. Waterman Award Computer Science
  • 2012 - IEEE Kiyo Tomiyasu Award “For demonstrating the practicability of a new theoretical foundation for the analysis and design of communication networks.”

Overview

Mung Chiang is affiliated with Purdue University West Lafayette in the United States and has made significant contributions to the field of computer science. Their research spans multiple subfields, notably artificial intelligence, computer networks and communications, and electrical and electronic engineering. The scientist's work also addresses areas such as computer vision and pattern recognition, as well as intersections with sociology and political science.

The primary topics of their research include privacy-preserving technologies in data, age of information optimization, stochastic gradient optimization techniques, and IoT and edge/fog computing. Additional topics explored involve cooperative communication and network coding, adversarial robustness in machine learning, and advanced MIMO systems optimization.

Mung Chiang has published extensively, with a strong presence in venues such as arXiv (Cornell University), IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications, IEEE Communications Magazine, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, and IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking.

  • RobustBench: a standardized adversarial robustness benchmark, 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Quantifying Political Leaning from Tweets and Retweets, 2021, Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media
  • UAV-Assisted Online Machine Learning Over Multi-Tiered Networks: A Hierarchical Nested Personalized Federated Learning Approach, 2022, IEEE Transactions on Network and Service Management
  • SSD: A Unified Framework for Self-Supervised Outlier Detection, 2021, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Robust Learning Meets Generative Models: Can Proxy Distributions Improve Adversarial Robustness?, 2021, arXiv (Cornell University)

The scientist's collaborative history includes frequent co-authors such as Christopher G. Brinton, Seyyedali Hosseinalipour, Kwang Taik Kim, David J. Love, and Prateek Mittal.

Recognition for their work is reflected in several awards. These include being named Fellow of the National Academy of Inventors in 2020, Fellow of the John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation in 2014, and the National Science Foundation Alan T. Waterman Award in 2013 for contributions to computer science. In 2012, Mung Chiang received the IEEE Kiyo Tomiyasu Award for demonstrating the practicability of a new theoretical foundation for the analysis and design of communication networks.

Best Publications

  • Fog and IoT: An Overview of Research Opportunities

    Mung Chiang;Tao Zhang

  • A tutorial on decomposition methods for network utility maximization

    D.P. Palomar;Mung Chiang

  • Layering as Optimization Decomposition: A Mathematical Theory of Network Architectures

    Mung Chiang;S.H. Low;A.R. Calderbank;J.C. Doyle

  • Rethinking virtual network embedding: substrate support for path splitting and migration

    Minlan Yu;Yung Yi;Jennifer Rexford;Mung Chiang

  • Power Control By Geometric Programming

    M. Chiang;Chee Wei Tan;D.P. Palomar;D. O'Neill

  • Balancing transport and physical Layers in wireless multihop networks: jointly optimal congestion control and power control

    Mung Chiang

  • Cross-Layer Congestion Control, Routing and Scheduling Design in Ad Hoc Wireless Networks

    L. Chen;S. H. Low;M. Chiang;J. C. Doyle

  • Geometric Programming for Communication Systems

    Mung Chiang

  • Power Control in Wireless Cellular Networks

    Mung Chiang;Prashanth Hande;Tian Lan;Chee Wei Tan

  • An Axiomatic Theory of Fairness in Network Resource Allocation

    Tian Lan;David Kao;Mung Chiang;Ashutosh Sabharwal

  • Joint VM placement and routing for data center traffic engineering

    Joe Wenjie Jiang;Tian Lan;Sangtae Ha;Minghua Chen

  • MIDU: enabling MIMO full duplex

    Ehsan Aryafar;Mohammad Amir Khojastepour;Karthikeyan Sundaresan;Sampath Rangarajan

  • Multiresource allocation: fairness-efficiency tradeoffs in a unifying framework

    Carlee Joe-Wong;Soumya Sen;Tian Lan;Mung Chiang

  • Alternative Distributed Algorithms for Network Utility Maximization: Framework and Applications

    D.P. Palomar;Mung Chiang

  • TUBE: time-dependent pricing for mobile data

    Sangtae Ha;Soumya Sen;Carlee Joe-Wong;Youngbin Im

  • A game-theoretic approach to energy-efficient power control in multicarrier CDMA systems

    F. Meshkati;Mung Chiang;H.V. Poor;S.C. Schwartz

  • Auction-Based Resource Allocation for Cooperative Communications

    Jianwei Huang;Zhu Han;Mung Chiang;H.V. Poor

  • Learning about Social Learning in MOOCs: From Statistical Analysis to Generative Model

    Christopher G. Brinton;Mung Chiang;Shaili Jain;Henry Lam

  • QoS and fairness constrained convex optimization of resource allocation for wireless cellular and ad hoc networks

    D. Julian;Mung Chiang;D. O'Neill;S. Boyd

  • A survey of smart data pricing: Past proposals, current plans, and future trends

    Soumya Sen;Carlee Joe-Wong;Sangtae Ha;Mung Chiang

  • RobustBench: a standardized adversarial robustness benchmark.

    Francesco Croce;Maksym Andriushchenko;Vikash Sehwag;Edoardo Debenedetti

Frequent Co-Authors

Sangtae Ha
Sangtae Ha University of Colorado Boulder
Chee Wei Tan
Chee Wei Tan Nanyang Technological University
Jianwei Huang
Jianwei Huang Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen
Yung Yi
Yung Yi Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology
Jennifer Rexford
Jennifer Rexford Princeton University
Tian Lan
Tian Lan George Washington University
A.R. Calderbank
A.R. Calderbank Duke University
Steven H. Low
Steven H. Low California Institute of Technology
Prateek Mittal
Prateek Mittal Princeton University
H. Vincent Poor
H. Vincent Poor Princeton University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative online degrees and career routes is a smart move for students considering computer science studies in the USA. Today, many fast track computer science degree options allow you to earn your qualification quickly and launch your tech career sooner. These accelerated, flexible programs appeal to students eager to enter this fast-growing industry without spending years in the classroom.

Academic requirements needn’t be a barrier, either. A number of will grad schools accept low gpa programs are available, offering pathways for those whose grades might not meet traditional entry criteria. This opens opportunities for driven learners from diverse academic backgrounds.

If your interests span beyond computer science, consider how tech expertise can support other fields. For example, environmental engineering online degree programs offer a multidisciplinary approach, merging CS skills with sustainable solutions. Similarly, there are many high-paying jobs with environmental science degree backgrounds, particularly for those with technical skills.

By exploring these online degree pathways, you’ll find a range of career possibilities—both inside and outside the traditional computer science landscape.

Best Scientists Citing Mung Chiang

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles